I assumed it was not confirmed since it was not added to the timeline of events that’s been broadcasted and shown on this thread. It’s been left out.Im smelling exactly what u r stepping in...Great question.
I assumed it was not confirmed since it was not added to the timeline of events that’s been broadcasted and shown on this thread. It’s been left out.Im smelling exactly what u r stepping in...Great question.
I am not speaking about this case, but just about crime scene staging in general. This is when a domestic murder is staged as another type of crime committed by someone other than the family. Generally these families are amateurs. They make mistakes in the cover up and hoax. They base their staging on movies and books, not how LE actually works.
To answer your question, the perpetrators may have thought it would look suspicious to be the last person to see the victim alive, and the first person to find her missing. Someone from church making a call might sound like a better story.
Again I am not talking about this case specifically. But exploring the theory of crime scene staging.
Several possible explanations:I keep thinking though... how very lucky it is for them that she has not been found yet.
They gave the family a week. If they were using it as extortion, they have been VERY lucky that she has not been found. IF the perp (s) are not the same as the note senders... how would the note sender know they would have week? Must be a gambler IMO
If you find it, could you link it? I've been trying to locate it but can only find the most recent one.But could the initial press conference be the most revealing for us? It was early on and maybe it is closer to the truth than subsequent statements / FBI involvement. I am going to go and re-watch it.
I agree. The transcript from the press conference when the sheriff is giving the timeline jumps from the time the pacemaker was disconnected from the app:Just as Richard Allen was not interviewed in the Delphi case.
The church phone call was removed from the timeline for a reason.
Those look like condenser units (A/C). But who knows.Yes it’s here
"Church member called family because she was concerned NG wasn't in church" is no longer on the LE timeline. Agree with Masked Woman that we are totally dependent on AG and TC for this critical part of the timeline.The issue I am currently having is that the most critical chunk of the timeline depends almost solely on AG and TC. We're currently having to assume LE was able to verify who from church called and exactly when. And of course, any confirmation that they were home during the critical hours.
I read earlier today that topographical maps, etc., use for searches are physical maps.Who carries maps anymore
Unless it was the gs.100% premeditated… moo
so strange to me. Yes, why would he not have memory of such a critical and absolutely necessary piece of informationThe Sheriff in the first Tuesday press conference when asked if he had talked to the people who reported her missing,
The Sheriff started to answer, "that's the family." But the reporter was still asking the question right when he answered that... so the reporter was asking, "have you talked to the people who reported her missing, the church people?" And then the Sheriff caught that part, so his answer was, "Oh, from the church as well. We're doing all kinds of interviews. Yes, I'm sure we have."
But... if you read it back, he's actually not specifically saying the sheriff's office DID in fact speak with anyone at the church. He said, "Yes, I'm sure we have" but in a way like well of course we would. But, it's possible there is some miscommunication here or why wouldn't he be have memory of this conversation.
I have made a post that explains things more clearly. We have been announcing to use initials only. Here is the latest post that hopefully clears things up once and for all.I said the same last night. From reading Rules I thought it not allowed so I have been very careful about how I word things.
Realistically though, he can't have been cleared (which is the same as being POI) With the HUGE amount of accusations flying around, I would've thought an official statement would be made if he has been deemed innocent, due to being close family and the ongoing detrimental effect. Deputies were at his house last night investigating so...
I just SO don't want to believe it.
Let me address this.Considering a million or so people are suspecting or outright accusing him of murdering his mother in law for money, he’s smart to maintain privacy.
Everything he did would be discussed incessantly online, as this thread demonstrates.
It’s not the norm for Websleuths to allow it.
I don't believe that this has been officially disclosed. Most of us, I think, have been assuming that it's from a smart garage door opener, but I don't think it's been explicitly said.I keep thinking about the garage door times. Those don't seem like estimates - they are very precise. Do they know these exact times from cameras at the house or did she have some sort of app or smart garage door opener?
It's here. At about the 7:30 mark.If you find it, could you link it? I've been trying to locate it but can only find the most recent one.
Is it one of these two?If you find it, could you link it? I've been trying to locate it but can only find the most recent one.
Possible LE is making moves as media and public are focused on super bowl. JMOWhat? I don’t understand.
I probably missed it, but has it been definitively said that the son-in-law took her home alone? I thought they changed it to "family" which had me confused because originally I thought they did say it was the son-in-law? It keeps changing and I can't keep up on the thread so any clarification would be so appreciated!!! TIA.I have made a post that explains things more clearly. We have been announcing to use initials only. Here is the latest post that hopefully clears things up once and for all.
Let me address this.Considering a million or so people are suspecting or outright accusing him of murdering his mother in law for money, he’s smart to maintain privacy.
Everything he did would be discussed incessantly online, as this thread demonstrates.
It’s not the norm for Websleuths to allow it.
There is nothing normal about this case. The son-in-law may have been the last person to see Nancy alive. The sheriff has not cleared anyone, and he has also stated there are no “prime suspects” at this time.
Because no one has been cleared, discussion is allowed...