Points taken. Guess wasn't meant so literal. Just meant definitely not the mastermind.Do you think he was the brawn? I think if he was physically present in AZ and involved in this, we'd have seen more evidence of it, even if LE didn't want to release that information yet. And I'm not sure what role "remote brawn" would play, but of course anything is possible. MOO....
I'm sorry, but "whoopsie murder" just sent me choking.I've hit delirium perhaps, but this is making me chuckle and I know it shouldn't. I am not sure my eyes will ever recover from the amount of words on a screen I have read the past few days.
ANYWAY - 'Homicide' & 'murder' are not interchangeable words, which is not really common knowledge I guess because I don't think most people commonly ponder these things. A 'homicide' can take place and it not be a murder. Homicide means a person killed a person. But that can range from something like "involuntary manslaughter" to capital murder. Murder involves intent - whether express or implied (absolutely on purpose or acting in a way that one could reasonably deduce someone would die). The one other "that's murder" situation is a homicide that occurs in the middle of committing some other dangerous felony, like perhaps a kidnapping or SA or armed robbery, etc.
But no, you can't just "whoopsie" murder someone.
Possibly the blood was placed there after the fact to make it look like NG had been attacked and then abducted from the house.The blood spatters in the front have bothered me a lot. There is no "movement" to them. They don't seem to come from the door or entryway, or proceed down the path. They seem static. I cannot envision a scenario of a bleeding human that would create such a pattern.
THANK YOU SO MUCH, the similar name confused me, so was the person a few pages back correct that he was in a different band known to SIL?ARRESTED FAKE RANSOM GUY WAS NOT IN A BAND WITH THE SIL.
Since LE took this notification from a church member off their timeline, I believe LE determined this didn't happen. MOIt could be a close church friend of NG’s that noticed. A lot of folks that age pay close attention to who’s missing from regular, weekly commitments. I remember years ago my grandmother would always mention when so and so missed church or Sunday school. And would usually call to check on them. They also had a system of checking in on homebound members. Obviously now you have zoom or live stream technology, but they may still have ways to keep members connected to the church aside from this. Not sure if that’s the case here, but could be.
Thank you so much for posting this!It's a video. Haven't watched it yet myself.
Here it is:
If an 84 year old woman wants to interact with church friends, she will go to the service in person and talk to them. She is not 14 years old where the norm would be to "meet up" with your buddies online.Well, I don’t know if she went in-person or not, but I imagine if she regularly did participate in the live-streaming chat thing, she would log in and say hello to her friends there. Especially if she was a long-time member, which I thought she was.
Just my opinion
I have to admit that once I saw the exact quote of what he supposedly texted I was a bit surprised.It may be unrelated - but there are enough data points that they might be connected in some way. (e.g. texting both AG and TC but not SG and the verbiage of the text was not a ransom - the exact verbiage is in the court records. This individual is also in a band in the same genre of TC) So now the detectives are trying to put the pieces together - and the "fake ransom hoax" part is just a way of detectives not trying to show their cards - but it's part of the puzzle they are putting together. Again - all speculation at this point.
And that's dated 2/7, right? RightHere's your clarification:
"Callella is not linked to the Bitcoin ransom demand, according to the complaint."
![]()
SoCal man accused of sending hoax ransom letter to Guthrie family appears in court
The Hawthorne man is charged with transmitting a demand for ransom, among other charges. The judge ordered him released on a $20,000 bond.abc7.com
Those billboards are digital and are probably too bright to use in Tucson.Interestingly enough, they aren't putting billboards up in Phoenix. Tucson news has covered NG extensively so people know her face in Tucson and perhaps that's the case in Phoenix, too.
IMO, this is not suspicious. SG is a public figure whose cell phone number is likely harder to get than ordinary citizens AG and TC. I have not personally tried to track down any of their numbers, but it's usually not hard to find a normal person's phone number in various online databases. High profile people often do a better job of keeping their info out of those things (though not always).e.g. texting both AG and TC but not SG
Since LE took this notification from a church member off their timeline, I believe LE determined this didn't happen. MO