- Joined
- Sep 14, 2018
- Messages
- 3,008
- Reaction score
- 34,091
Meant no disrespect- its good to pull the data apart to see where the weak spots are.I actually agree. It's a step away from junk science. So, "my profiling" is based only on whatever we know or think we know about this case.
There are some great books on this subject of profiling and how they borrow many tactics from fortune tellers and mediums.
There are statistical based models of crime that are very useful. The issue with this case is that all of the common patterns have very significant problems with them.
The generally accepted patterns IMO-
-She was more likely than not killed by someone close to her or related.
-This person is more likely to be a male than not.
-She is far less likely to be a victim of a kidnapping than she is a random crime or a familial crime (murder during a burglary, argument, heat of passion).
-It is likely, if this was a murder, to be hidden very far (<50 miles) from where the crime occurred.
The family seems to be willing to bet $6M that the kidnapping story is the correct one, but is the least likely in my mind.
Last edited: