AZ Nancy Guthrie, 84, (mother of TODAY Show host Savannah Guthrie) missing - last seen in the Catalina foothills area on Jan 31, 2026

  • #14,741
What would be the reason for the FBI/LE to be at AG”s home two to three times removing items and taking pictures inside the house if they’re not involved?
It was said on news this morning that they are starting from the beginning and rechecking everything. Sorry no link so this is MOO
 
  • #14,742
These articles state that St Andrews Presbyterian Church is the one NG attended. Do you have reason to believe she attended CFC?
https://www.cnn.com/2026/02/07/us/savannah-guthrie-nancy-faith-religion

Nancy Guthrie's church asks congregation to pray for missing 84-year-old

(If she attended both churches, that might explain some of the discrepancies about the call. But I haven't seen the CFC mentioned as a place she attended.)

JMO

I see I was incorrect about which church she attended. I knew it was Presbyterian and I seen Catalina foothills so I thought this was the one. Thanks for the clarification and I will delete my other post.
 
  • #14,743
The second letter could've provided other instructions or another account altogether ("we understand" and "we will pay"), but with the information we have it is not a good sign to see that account still empty.

JMO.
My thoughts, as well. The second letter was sent to just ONE station. Are the kidnappers monitoring the media, especially TMZ?

This would require FBI to start as ground zero tracing the account.

Moo …
 
  • #14,744
The FBI agent said it's likely someone who had worked on the house/in the house and knew what she had. Most people are very kind to workers, offering a cold drink, or bathroom use. Gives them a chance to case the house while the homeowner is unsuspecting. They went to rob her, and she woke up and that's when the original plan went sideways. He thinks it was a moronic split decision to take her and hatch the kidnapping plan. They didn't want to leave a witness, but maybe weren't prepared to murder her.

As far as the AG and SIL he said (starting at 23:00m approx). He said the focus on her house has to do with gathering evidence (digital info) about help AG hired for Nancy, all the electronics would be on Annie's stuff because she would have been the appointment maker since she's been doing this years and years. He also said most people who are accused "lawyer up" and shut up. Elizabeth Smart's dad was a suspect, they look at and rule out the closest, then rule out. Deep dive on Tomasso, he's a long time 6th grade teacher in the sciences, no criminal record and he said, "If they were hard up on money there would be a hell of a lot easier ways to get it, like robbing a bank than to do this". The family doesn't fit the profile, he said.
Sorry, not buying this. They're not initiating ruling out fam on Day 9 IMO. Any digital info for hiring contractors etc. would have been on AG phone and asked for by Day 2 IMO.

3 hours and 3 men in the garage at night...

If it were a botched robbery turned kidnapping, they likely would have let her out somewhere the next day, especially after they realized she was SG's mom.

And in your scenario, do you think this contractor also sent the RN or that is a random third party or ?



MOO
 
Last edited:
  • #14,745
I think contact could mean a phone call but I think it is interesting that the complaint says contacted and notified. Why not just say called and notified?
Maybe the call never happened? Saying contacted/notified could be in person, email, text and by phone, but it seems it’s purposely worded vaguely. MOO
 
  • #14,746
DBM
 
  • #14,747
That whole message is off.

"We received your message and we understand," Guthrie said in the brief video posted to Instagram. "We beg you now to return our mother to us so we can celebrate with her. This is the only way we will have peace. This is very valuable to us, and we will pay."

Why send a message that you're going to pay instead of just paying? Why refer to your mother as "this"? This is very valuable to us. What is "this"? It's distancing language, which is a little bizarre.


This may have been word for word what they were told to say from the perps. No asking for POI, no speculative language. It's called control. Say this and nothing else. They wanted to see them squirm.. Cruel? Yes! Feeding the perps sense of superiority..IMO, absolutely!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14,748
No they didn't. They said her garage door opened at 9:48 pm and at 9:50 pm. They did not say why the garage door opened or whether anyone entered or exited because they only have the specific evidence of the garage opening and closing.

Anything else requires assumption or more evidence.
Except…if we all are now going to accept the Callela Criminal Complaint as absolute truth (as we seem to be doing with the “contact” from the church), the first sentence says, “N.G. was last seen inside her residence in the Catalina Foothills community outside Tucson, Arizona, on January 31, 2026.” Not sure how anyone would have “seen” NG in her residence unless she herself entered the garage. I’d post a link to the complaint but it has been posted here numerous times already.

moo.
 
  • #14,749

Daily Mail are reporting another camera removed from the home and I just heard live on CNN that the police are still hoping to extract data from the cameras.

Fingers crossed!!
 
  • #14,750
Yup, I totally agree with this, and I think it's a key point.

If the messages were sent using TOR (unconfirmed, just speaking in hypotheticals and opinion here), and LE was simply starting from that fact, with no particular person of interest, it's going to be a real slog to go backward through that and find the source. However, if there is already a person or persons who they think might be involved, checking if that person has been using TOR (or some VPN service, or another method of hiding) is much more straightforward.
When Covid hit and remote work started, most public (government) agencies (like schools and universities) required that all laptops and computers use VPN for any official business while working remotely (like for zoom meetings, classes online, etc.). A lot of universities continued to require this even after Covid for any work done remotely online. So if the SIL was a public school teacher, which I think has been stated on this thread, then I would assume that he has/uses VPN on his computers/laptops. JMO.
 
Last edited:
  • #14,751
This feels like a hoax. Adult kidnappings are rare for the most part. When is the last time we heard about an adult or child being kidnapped for ransom?

Here are two I can recall and Wikipedia link:
Patty Hearst
Lindbergh baby

Here's a few kidnappings in recent years that have been reported publicly. The kidnappings by Matthew Muller speak to the chilling effect of calling a report a hoax without thorough investigation and to victims not reporting the crime out of fear that the kidnapper could return.

I'm using the kidnapper's name out of respect for the victims' privacy.

Kenneth McIsaac - convicted in March 2025 of kidnapping a family for ransom.

Putnam Richardson, age 79, kidnapped a local attorney for ransom in Beaumont, TX in July 2024.

Kidnapper Craig Ross, Jr - kidnapped 9-year-old girl from campground in New York state in 2023. Ransom note he left in the family's mailbox led to identification of the kidnapper and the rescue of the child.


Matthew Muller - entered homes were couples were sleeping and kidnapped the woman for ransom. Succeeded twice. Police called the first kidnapping a hoax. Second couple did not report it for 9 years. Third attempt was foiled, leading to his arrest.
 
  • #14,752
I guess the Guthrie family is likely just staying low, especially since their public messages have all been directly speaking to the kidnappers. I would normally say it's a little unusual that they haven't put out any kind of public statement like, "We are united as a family and just want our mother to come home. Any speculation about our family members is unfounded and hurtful. We continue to cooperate fully with LE." Blah blah. Like even Laci Peterson's family kept saying that about Scott until they no longer could believe it themselves and stopped publicly supporting him.

But - this case is different in that SG is already public figure and they are dealing with ransom notes and messages. If SIL is not involved, they probably do not actually give a F about noise and chatter or have the bandwidth to deal with what the public is saying right now. They can speak out on that later. So I don't think it's necessarily significant, just unusual. I still don't think SIL is involved. But totally could be wrong.
 
  • #14,753
Except…if we all are now going to accept the Callela Criminal Complaint as absolute truth (as we seem to be doing with the “contact” from the church), the first sentence says, “N.G. was last seen inside her residence in the Catalina Foothills community outside Tucson, Arizona, on January 31, 2026.” Not sure how anyone would have “seen” NG in her residence unless she herself entered the garage.
i assume that "last seen" is going off the in law's sighting, no?
 
  • #14,754

Daily Mail are reporting another camera removed from the home and I just heard live on CNN that the police are still hoping to extract data from the cameras.

Fingers crossed!!
From NG's house?
I'm curious as to why that would not have been done on day one.
 
  • #14,755
  • #14,756
DBM
 
  • #14,757
Why are there all the drone shots over NG's house, rooftop, yard and yet none over AG's garage when all of the flashing was going on? Disappointing.
 
  • #14,758
They definitely don't fit the profile of something premeditated.

I'll say no more....
MY OWN SPECULATION ONLY.
He said they don't fit the profile, period. There is always a possibility of outlier, but he's an expect and his scenario makes the most sense. Someone went to rob, she woke up, they panicked and made (more) really dumb decisions.
 
  • #14,759
The person who called the family could have called or texted NG, having first noted her absence, and had no reply. That might have been unusual for NG – both the absence and the silence.

The family could also have called NG. The person from church could have been a friend who didn’t want to become public in this investigation.

It’s all speculation but since the FBI complaint against the hoaxer mentions the phone call, we can be reasonably sure that details of the call were verified.
What I meant was that it seems odd - based on her not even being there but on a zoom call -- someone is going to actually notice her username isn't there, and call her kids? Unless she talked to this person the day before and said, "Oh, I'll definitely be part of the zoom call tomorrow! If you don't see me there, call my family!" It just seems unlikely to me. But I am just an ordinary citizen - no LE or investigative experience.
 
  • #14,760
Here's a few kidnappings in recent years that have been reported publicly. The kidnappings by Matthew Muller speak to the chilling effect of calling a report a hoax without thorough investigation and to victims not reporting the crime out of fear that the kidnapper could return.

I'm using the kidnapper's name out of respect for the victims' privacy.

Kenneth McIsaac - convicted in March 2025 of kidnapping a family for ransom.

Putnam Richardson, age 79, kidnapped a local attorney for ransom in Beaumont, TX in July 2024.

Kidnapper Craig Ross, Jr - kidnapped 9-year-old girl from campground in New York state in 2023. Ransom note he left in the family's mailbox led to identification of the kidnapper and the rescue of the child.


Matthew Muller - entered homes were couples were sleeping and kidnapped the woman for ransom. Succeeded twice. Police called the first kidnapping a hoax. Second couple did not report it for 9 years. Third attempt was foiled, leading to his arrest.
I know the mcisaac case very well (local to me) and it was not a traditional kidnapping. more like a home invasion where an unstable person (who lived in the same apartment complex) held a family hostage for complicated reasons. money was not the motive.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
481
Guests online
4,039
Total visitors
4,520

Forum statistics

Threads
640,736
Messages
18,763,674
Members
244,713
Latest member
negator
Back
Top