mikeshanty
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2026
- Messages
- 271
- Reaction score
- 1,962
FBI Director arrived in Tucson 9 hours ago. I wonder if we will have a sudden press conference in the next few hours.
I think some wondered about the last person known to have seen her, and then the AB statement…it took some in that direction. Then we had LE go back to the home at night with all the flashes in the garage.I’ve never believed that any of the family is involved, and I’m angry of the posts that slandered people are written. Honestly, this is not a game of clue but of real life gut wrenching reality. Websluthers would bounce ideas of how to help solve, instead of this social media free for all of opinions and bashing.
No, it is not a game of clue; however, it has been said and still stands to my knowledge that NO ONE has been cleared and they have NO suspects, NO person(s)-of-interest at this time. IF they had said "the family has been cleared" then, of course, they are out of the question for discussion, but that is not the case - at least as of right now.I’ve never believed that any of the family is involved, and I’m angry of the posts that slandered people are written. Honestly, this is not a game of clue but of real life gut wrenching reality. Websluthers would bounce ideas of how to help solve, instead of this social media free for all of opinions and bashing.
It was stated on one of the podcasts that LE were given permission to search AG home, no search warrant required.We don't know that LE didn't get a search warrant. they likely did. They ALSO may have asked for, and received, permission. Belt and suspenders approach, and also to see if the party will consent. That may tell you something. Just my opinions, fwiw.
I am guessing this is why many of the long time frequent posters here, are MIA.I’ve never believed that any of the family is involved, and I’m angry of the posts that slandered people are written. Honestly, this is not a game of clue but of real life gut wrenching reality. Websluthers would bounce ideas of how to help solve, instead of this social media free for all of opinions and bashing.
The deepfakes freak me out. They really do. I know there’s certain things to look for but AI has gotten very good. It can be really hard to tell sometimes. I found myself questioning if some of SG and siblings videos were deep fakes. I find it unsettling and somewhat frightening.It's always likely. I many high profile cases it happens and you need to weed it out. One historically famous nationally covered kidnapping story was the Charles Lindbergh baby kidnapping in 1932. It captivated the country at the time. There were 5 fake ransom notes determined in that case.
Today with AI deepfakes fake proof of life ransoms for faked kidnapping using people's altered social media are such a thing that the FBI even released a PSA about it in Dec. 2025.
They should ask for the public’s help again, here’s a picture of the blue truck we’re looking for etc., but then again, maybe they don’t need help. I keep bringing this up and will do my best to let it go.If the ransom demand is determined not to be related to the original crime (i.e. a hoax/opportunist), and if they are truly as desperate/without leads as SG makes it sound in this last video, LE should really hold another press conference as it feels like there would still be a possible threat to the public.
Seems "victim blaming" to suggest the family is involved, especially when there isn't anything to suggest they were.No, it is not a game of clue; however, it has been said and still stands to my knowledge that NO ONE has been cleared and they have NO suspects, NO person(s)-of-interest at this time. IF they had said "the family has been cleared" then, of course, they are out of the question for discussion, but that is not the case - at least as of right now.
No one has been cleared, so it stands (within reason) that people will look at those closest to Nancy as that is what the professionals do as well. I personally haven't seen any 'bashing' but maybe I missed it.
Until the family is cleared unfortunately everyone is a suspect.
MOO.
I think most people would just view her as a human who wants her mom back.As awful as this sounds, SG also has her professional credibility at stake.
There was a warning for parents that scammers use social media snippets to get your kids voice then call/text you and deepfake your kids voice for a ransom. Just horrible stuff. And yeah, a lot of the AI videos out there now are surprisingly good for the layman, Fortunately the FBI has some ways of detecting these things, but with the speed we're moving at that's even getting harder. Strange days indeed.The deepfakes freak me out. They really do. I know there’s certain things to look for but AI has gotten very good. It can be really hard to tell sometimes. I found myself questioning if some of SG and siblings videos were deep fakes. I find it unsettling and somewhat frightening.
A District Attorney is going to want both. Because a good defense attorney can challenge consent based on capacity at the time given - such as the extraordinary circumstances/emotional and mental duress in this case. IF the defense attorney succeeded, and there was no warrant, all the evidence LE found in the search would be barred. If LE had a warrant as well, the evidence is coming in anyway. It would be very unusual for LE not to have gotten a warrant, even if they had permission. Prosecution 101.It was stated on one of the podcasts that LE were given permission to search AG home, no search warrant required.
I think everyone is entitled to their own opinion, even if we disagree, we should be respectful. Just because someone thinks a family member is or isn’t involved, let them share their thoughts. Yes, I’ve said I think family is involved and I right now I still do. If it turns out I’m wrong, I’ll admit it.I am guessing this is why many of the long time frequent posters here, are MIA.
1000% agree on this!Seems "victim blaming" to suggest the family is involved, especially when there isn't anything to suggest they were.
Why did Chris Watts take his wife and childrens' bodies out of the house? Why did Scott Peterson take his wife's body out of the house? And so on, a hundred times.I totally agree , why take her? Why take an old woman for seemingly no reason!? Now, we do see the occasional, extremely crazy, situation where they want their own of something so they take someone else’s. Like when a baby is taken out of a pregnant woman. Not pretending I know anything but I completely agree with you. JMO
Whether SG meant it this way or not, I think there is an indirect but clear message to the perpetrators. SG is showing that she is coming out of her denial/shock/overwhelmed stage and taking direct strong action. She is going to use her legal, journalism, PR training and skills, as well as her national public stature, to get her mother back. She is appealing to the general public to keep their eyes peeled for anything that may help. This will put some pressure on the perps?JMO, the previous video from SG and family pretty directly addressed the perps. If she wanted to address them again in this one, I think she would have been similarly direct, if not more so. I have a hard time reading anything she said in the most recent video as a message to them.
She also has a husband and children. Where might it go if she did pay?As awful as this sounds, SG also has her professional credibility at stake.
@LAborn Both of your opinions are valid, but WS says it's permitted with a couple of stipulations. Mainly initials.1000% agree on this!