They made a clear and conscious decision for the SWAT and hostage team information to be publicized. Maybe somehow drawing out the suspect or suspects? MOI wonder if they’re publicizing the SWAT and hostage teams to see if the suspect makes moves, reportedly is local. MOO
That happens a lot with abducted kids. And kidnapper participates in searches.Would be wild if NG was being held right in the neighborhood. But it always did seem like a local crime. JMO.
Occams razor tells us its to block the
And perhaps NG phone, apple watch, leftover dinner food, change of clothes, snacks. I want to see the proof that NG made it home on 1/31/26.There would be evidence of the murder in the house. I don't think LE has said anything to point to that.
I think the backpack has a change of clothes, rope, possibly foot covers as fibers from a car, home, etc would be picked up in the house.
Anyone else think that gun looked like it had a knob at the end, like a Roth or Japanese Nimbu? That would be an unusual gun.
It is a real issue. Sad example: Munich Olympics 1972 hostage crisis, that’s where live news coverage gave the criminals real time information as to where officers were located.Me too. This is all very strange and not in a good way, tbh. And I say that as a true-crime follower.
jmo
It would not surprise me if she is found within a mile of her home. mooWould be wild if NG was being held right in the neighborhood. But it always did seem like a local crime. JMO.
We have no way of knowing 1) what other videos they may still be working on restoring (we've seen that it took days to recover the clips we have seen, so it's not trivial), and 2) what videos may have been given to the FBI but not yet released. And if they do have a video of her being dropped off by family as the family said, would that warrant release to the public anyway?What I don't understand is that even without a subscription to the ring camera the FBI was able to work with a tech company to unearth the video of the suspect at her door at 2 am. If they could do that why can't they unearth a video of when she was dropped off at her home around 9:45 pm Jan 31st.
And we know they removed the nest camera. Which appears to be what’s happening towards the end of those videos. The camera is disconnected at 1:47am. Which would mean the picture of him without the backpack, IMO, happened first. Which doesn’t really make sense for a variety of reasons but who knowsI know it’s the same guy, but why appear without his gun, backpack and eyes covered?
that's why I said maybe has a motorcycle or moped... but he could be a skier too...a person without a headlamp, so not a camperOr tracking the place he bought all those items. Maybe a shopkeeper remembers someone coming in to buy a ski mask, which is a pretty memorable thing to buy at this time of year in a warm place?
It just looks more like an offering to me, not like he's using the flowers to shield his face.So does the fact he was blocking the camera with them, especially since he had already approached it and walked back to get some. That sounds more far-fetched to me. Just trying to ponder other reasons he'd do that. I'm not convinced he did what I said, it was an idea I was tossing out.
All JMO.
ETA - Plus, he's not even trying to hide behind them, or use them to block his face. Not from this angle. Nope.
![]()
![]()
Authorities Release First Videos, Pics of Potential Subject in Nancy Guthrie Case
We now have video and images of a person of interest in the Nancy Guthrie abduction from her Arizona home more than a week ago.www.tmz.com
Check the walmarts, it's helped in many cases.John Miller CNN:
Number of opportunities here:
The items in the video may have been thrown away and could be recovered (backpack, gloves, mask, etc). Someone may see an item and remember seeing it in an unusual spot.
Were they discarded together? Were they purchased together as part of a "mission kit."
If you can’t nail them, keep checking until there’s no further evidence…Correct?I am kinda stuck on they keep going back to Annie's house-- I don't know what to think about this except that she and her husband are suspects.
We don’t know that they didn’t. Why would they give that info to the public?What I don't understand is that even without a subscription to the ring camera the FBI was able to work with a tech company to unearth the video of the suspect at her door at 2 am. If they could do that why can't they unearth a video of when she was dropped off at her home around 9:45 pm Jan 31st.