• #25,421
  • #25,422
New message to TMZ! Claiming to know the abductor.
sooooo why isn't that info given to police? Not directing this at you @txsleuth20
 
  • #25,423
Possible kickbacks from the lab? Sheriff Nanos was investigated by the FBI back in 2016 for misuse of over $200,000 in seized funds.



Kickbacks or worse. This guy could have rubbed some DNA off his daughters ex boyfriend for all we know. Lol. This guy cannot be trusted im sorry. Anyone who would not be running thus through the FBI... sorry, dont trust it. Sketch
 
  • #25,424
Can the family request FBI take the lead? I’d be enraged if I was SG.
FBI can’t take the lead unless specific legal criteria are met. The family can ask, but it won’t change the law.
 
  • #25,425
FBI would trump a sheriff, yes. But a local sheriff's ego would trump the entirety of the FBI.
There is always always someone above him who can make a different decision imo. If he is blocking the evidence, why isn’t he jumping on it? Really curious to know what he has that he’s not sharing?!
 
  • #25,426
ok take 'reward' completely out of the equation. take LE out of the equation. the family has nothing to do with LE/FBI/reward money. eliminate all of the above.

why hasn't any member of the guthrie family tried to post an 'answer', plea, desperation attempt (i.e. money) to all of these (IMO, bogus) ransom requests. the obvious is that lawyers have advised against such 'answers'.

i'm thinking there's another answer...curious as to your thoughts.
It could have a number of reasons IMO.
SG is also a lawyer and maybe she simply doesn't value the notes to be real.
The FBI could have advised against it with some sort of logical explanation.
The fam wants some proof before paying.
Maybe the ransom notes as we know them has been taken out of context and contain not much info to go on, nothing valuable for the fam. The notes never went public.
They said they will pay but i can imagine first wanting to have some sort of evidence they are communicating with the right person(s).
I really have no clue, it's all just IMO 😅
 
  • #25,427
  • #25,428
I have held off on commenting on this sheriff for a number of reasons, mostly being that this case is pretty unprecedented and I can’t imagine being in his position. However, after everything that has happened in this investigation, I have to wonder if he is either just unbelievably in over his head or if he’s purposefully messing this up. In a situation like this, I think any decent sheriff wanting to solve the case would take guidance from FBI (like in the idaho 4 case.) To not only ignore their input but to purposefully go against it is at best a little weird and at worst corruption. JMO.
Agree. I keep giving him the benefit of the doubt. But, at this point, if the Sheriff is not sharing key evidence with the FBI, this is a huge problem and totally unacceptable. JMO
 
  • #25,429
uploaded 1 hr ago.

 
  • #25,430
People keep asking that but don't seem to realise that the benefit in a missing person is that they can't change their inheritance or out someone for a fraud or other crime being committed.
If she's missing there will certainly be a financial audit by her POA. Her house is in a revokable trust in her name. Assuming she has her three children on the trust there any fraud or illegal activity are going to come to light.
 
  • #25,431
1770945179987.webp

“Every tip is reviewed for credibility, relevance, and information that can be acted upon by law enforcement,” the FBI Phoenix office said. “Threat Intake Examiners at the National Threat Operations Center (NTOC) and FBI personnel are supporting a 24-hour command post in which dozens of agents and investigators are assigned leads and tips to action each shift.”

Charles Latibeaudiere, co-executive producer at TMZ, joins NewsNation to discuss the note sent to its tipline Thursday from the same individual who said they were willing to name Nancy Guthrie's kidnapper(s) in exchange for a bitcoin.

For the second time in as many days, TMZ received an email Thursday morning from a person claiming to know the identity of those who kidnapped Guthrie. The outlet received an email on Wednesday demanding the payment of 1 bitcoin in exchange for the name of the person responsible. As of this writing, no deposit has been made into the account provided.

Per TMZ, the person who sent the second note complained about "not being taken seriously." The outlet refrained from fully releasing all of the information contained in the note, in accordance with a request from law enforcement. However, it was noted that the sender made "ominous statements" and that payment was being sought so that they could "lay low" after identifying Guthrie's abductor out of fear of retaliation. The sender also reportedly stated that this would be their last attempt to help Guthrie's family and the police.

The value of 1 bitcoin as of late Thursday afternoon was just over $66,000 (per CoinDesk).

"Nancy Guthrie is bleeding from some area, either the hands or the face," forensic pathologist Dr. Michael Baden told Fox News Digital. "The nature of the blood spots with little pale centers or donut shapes are typical for drops that come from the nose or mouth, because they're mixed with air."

"That means she's coughing up blood or dripping from the nose. Otherwise, there would be a dripping from a cut from above, possibly from the hands or face."
 
Last edited:
  • #25,432
  • #25,433
yes. Also makes you wonder if he has something major to hide. James Burke of the Gilgo Beach investigation certainly did.

Edited to add that a poster upthread mentioned that possibly the sheriff simply used the lab because it was already working with DNA in this case and would have everything together for faster results. To me, that makes a lot of sense.
Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.
 
  • #25,434
Here’s the Reuters report. Prepare to be enraged:

This is absolutely insane! Someone posted up thread that in an interview about the case, someone basically said this sheriff had created a toxic work environment. MOO from previous posts.

Is he someone who feels who knows everything and can't learn from others? This is not the time to be acting a fool!

Does the FBI typically pass on or absorb costs associated with processing evidence?

This sheriff is seeming more incompetent by the day. He should be following standard investigative protocol with this case as he would in any other. Thorough, attention to detail, professional, sense of urgency, etc. This all seems to have been missing from the jump. MOO

I sure hope that this investigation, that was flawed from the start, moves in the right direction and brings closure and provides justice for Mrs. Guthrie.

All MOO
 
  • #25,435
No, never seen Lantana grown vertical
Thanks, that would've been weird but i couldn’t really tell on the door cam video
 
  • #25,436
Taking ransom out of the equation (using only what we know) the perpetrator (s) benefit is unknown. What did they get out of this? It seems deeply personal but the masked perp throws me off unless he's hired.

Investigation is under the authority of Sheriff's Department with FBI Assisting. Agree that this must be about ego. And it's impeding the investigation and making it move slower since FBI will only get the evidence after the private agency that the Sheriff sent the evidence. MOO
It is my understanding that the sheriff is in charge because it's local; FBI brought in to assist. Obvious, however, FBI is more knowledgeable, has more experience and resources. Got to be an ego thing with the sheriff.
 
  • #25,437
Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.
Did NG have a connection to local law enforcement /sheriff?
 
Last edited:
  • #25,438
Jewelers and musicians you say?
Jewelers, musicians, pilots, people in show business. Amazing, but shows me how common bite lights are.
 
  • #25,439
I really don’t believe we have all the info to jump the gun and say he blocked evidence. In my opinion, it could have already been a part of their process the day the got the glove from inside the house to send it out, and then the FBI entered into it, and now because of that glove being analyzed out of state, the access is limited. If they sent it to DNA labs international here in FL, then FBI uses them too. I am thinking it is more a chain of custody situation.
 
  • #25,440
Bingo! Inheritance, fraud or to cover up another crime.
Occam’s razor.

At this time, I think it’s to cover up another crime, seems most likely. Remove person who might snitch (NG). I am very open to changing my mind.

JMO
You think that Occam's Razor = SIL/AG with no criminal record that has ever been reported (and it would have been at this point) suddenly killed an EIGHTY FOUR year old woman (her MOTHER) for the inheritance, hid the body well enough that it will take years to declare her dead to get said money, turned over their house, their car to LE with nothing found to arrest them as of yet and dressed up as a masked man to perform on a camera feed that was destroyed and found 2 weeks later?? You don't think this sounds contrived? I agree in normal situations absent evidence or data the last person to be seen with the victim when they were alive needs a hard look as a top suspect (and especially immediate family). But when info comes out that is contradictory occam's razor doesn't always point to them anymore. There is other information that makes it much less likely to be them imo.
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
277
Guests online
3,314
Total visitors
3,591

Forum statistics

Threads
641,757
Messages
18,778,087
Members
244,863
Latest member
evvywoods
Back
Top