No, never seen Lantana grown verticalThis video was posted by SG. Looks to be at the front door of NG home. Are the flowers the same ones that video guy at door was holding?
No, never seen Lantana grown verticalThis video was posted by SG. Looks to be at the front door of NG home. Are the flowers the same ones that video guy at door was holding?
sooooo why isn't that info given to police? Not directing this at you @txsleuth20New message to TMZ! Claiming to know the abductor.
Kickbacks or worse. This guy could have rubbed some DNA off his daughters ex boyfriend for all we know. Lol. This guy cannot be trusted im sorry. Anyone who would not be running thus through the FBI... sorry, dont trust it. SketchPossible kickbacks from the lab? Sheriff Nanos was investigated by the FBI back in 2016 for misuse of over $200,000 in seized funds.
![]()
PCSD: FBI probe into alleged misuse of funds
Allegations of money laundering and obstruction of justice against Pima County Sheriff's Department leaders.www.kgun9.com
![]()
Documents: Pima Sheriff Chris Nanos requested money transfers into fund at center of probe
Former second-in-command was indicted last month over use of RICO money.tucson.com
![]()
Documents: Pima Sheriff Chris Nanos requested money transfers into fund at center of probe
Former second-in-command was indicted last month over use of RICO money.tucson.com
FBI can’t take the lead unless specific legal criteria are met. The family can ask, but it won’t change the law.Can the family request FBI take the lead? I’d be enraged if I was SG.
There is always always someone above him who can make a different decision imo. If he is blocking the evidence, why isn’t he jumping on it? Really curious to know what he has that he’s not sharing?!FBI would trump a sheriff, yes. But a local sheriff's ego would trump the entirety of the FBI.
It could have a number of reasons IMO.ok take 'reward' completely out of the equation. take LE out of the equation. the family has nothing to do with LE/FBI/reward money. eliminate all of the above.
why hasn't any member of the guthrie family tried to post an 'answer', plea, desperation attempt (i.e. money) to all of these (IMO, bogus) ransom requests. the obvious is that lawyers have advised against such 'answers'.
i'm thinking there's another answer...curious as to your thoughts.
or a breed of catI think it's ok if you're talking about a rug.
Agree. I keep giving him the benefit of the doubt. But, at this point, if the Sheriff is not sharing key evidence with the FBI, this is a huge problem and totally unacceptable. JMOI have held off on commenting on this sheriff for a number of reasons, mostly being that this case is pretty unprecedented and I can’t imagine being in his position. However, after everything that has happened in this investigation, I have to wonder if he is either just unbelievably in over his head or if he’s purposefully messing this up. In a situation like this, I think any decent sheriff wanting to solve the case would take guidance from FBI (like in the idaho 4 case.) To not only ignore their input but to purposefully go against it is at best a little weird and at worst corruption. JMO.
If she's missing there will certainly be a financial audit by her POA. Her house is in a revokable trust in her name. Assuming she has her three children on the trust there any fraud or illegal activity are going to come to light.People keep asking that but don't seem to realise that the benefit in a missing person is that they can't change their inheritance or out someone for a fraud or other crime being committed.
Not all men. But maybe enough for it to be problematic.Men have huge egos.
Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.yes. Also makes you wonder if he has something major to hide. James Burke of the Gilgo Beach investigation certainly did.
Edited to add that a poster upthread mentioned that possibly the sheriff simply used the lab because it was already working with DNA in this case and would have everything together for faster results. To me, that makes a lot of sense.
This is absolutely insane! Someone posted up thread that in an interview about the case, someone basically said this sheriff had created a toxic work environment. MOO from previous posts.Here’s the Reuters report. Prepare to be enraged:
![]()
Exclusive-FBI blocked from key access to evidence in Nancy Guthrie abduction case, source says
By Jana Winter WASHINGTON, Feb 12 (Reuters) - An Arizona sheriff is blocking FBI access to key evidence in the investigation into the abduction of U.S. television journalist Savannah Guthrie's mother,uk.news.yahoo.com
Thanks, that would've been weird but i couldn’t really tell on the door cam videoNo, never seen Lantana grown vertical
Taking ransom out of the equation (using only what we know) the perpetrator (s) benefit is unknown. What did they get out of this? It seems deeply personal but the masked perp throws me off unless he's hired.
It is my understanding that the sheriff is in charge because it's local; FBI brought in to assist. Obvious, however, FBI is more knowledgeable, has more experience and resources. Got to be an ego thing with the sheriff.Investigation is under the authority of Sheriff's Department with FBI Assisting. Agree that this must be about ego. And it's impeding the investigation and making it move slower since FBI will only get the evidence after the private agency that the Sheriff sent the evidence. MOO
Did NG have a connection to local law enforcement /sheriff?Yes we don't know if it was just a practical decision which is being blown out of proportion or if it is a symptom of deeper problems.
Jewelers, musicians, pilots, people in show business. Amazing, but shows me how common bite lights are.Jewelers and musicians you say?
You think that Occam's Razor = SIL/AG with no criminal record that has ever been reported (and it would have been at this point) suddenly killed an EIGHTY FOUR year old woman (her MOTHER) for the inheritance, hid the body well enough that it will take years to declare her dead to get said money, turned over their house, their car to LE with nothing found to arrest them as of yet and dressed up as a masked man to perform on a camera feed that was destroyed and found 2 weeks later?? You don't think this sounds contrived? I agree in normal situations absent evidence or data the last person to be seen with the victim when they were alive needs a hard look as a top suspect (and especially immediate family). But when info comes out that is contradictory occam's razor doesn't always point to them anymore. There is other information that makes it much less likely to be them imo.Bingo! Inheritance, fraud or to cover up another crime.
Occam’s razor.
At this time, I think it’s to cover up another crime, seems most likely. Remove person who might snitch (NG). I am very open to changing my mind.
JMO