Further observations re kidnapping and Lantana man:
1. Lantana man seemed to go through a lot more effort to conceal every inch of his body than he did to be agile for a break in. At least double clothed - likely done to shed top layer head to toe once kidnapping complete? The thickness of the gloved hand in FBI video seemed to make his hands almost unusable for fine motor skills.
2. FBI videos looked like Lantana man was thickly dressed and if so he would likely be on the slimmer side. Not much of a gut in pics even with thick or multi-layered clothes. Also he appeared to be bow legged. It did originally strike me as someone that has worked on his feet a lot based on his movements and lower body stiffness - although the stiffness could be due to the bulky clothing.
3. Was his head to toe coverage for DNA transfer, covering of tattoos or both? Someone in a much earlier post here mentioned they could see a tattoo through the gloves inside of his wrist. It did not seem apparent to me. To others it did.
4. He may have put the long side of his hand to the camera if he believed FBI had technology to see under his gloves and could therefore detect identifying finger prints or tattoos. If so, could be someone previously fingerprinted or identifiable through tattoos and he knows this. If he is single gloved then he has large hands IMO.
5. The gun holstered in the front seems more for scare than usage. Non matching gun to holster as others have pointed out causing him to repeatedly reposition the gun in the FBI videos strikes me as an amateur. IMO Professionals would buy a holster that holds their specific gun as they would be using it frequently for their crimes.
6. His clothing and shoes looked more new than old. Crisp almost - although need to acct for night vision images. Clothing bought specifically for this event? I don’t think a professional would buy a new outer set of clothes for each of their crimes but I remain open to this possibility. The outer layer was relatively inexpensive.
The lack of continuing ransom demands makes me think the primary reason for the kidnapping was not for ransom. And no body yet found dumped in the desert or elsewhere continues this theory.
If it was kidnapping to cover for intended murder then this would make more sense. If it was kidnapping gone horribly wrong and ransom was primary motive then it seems they would continue with ransom notes for return of body. It’s a lot easier to leave a body to be found for ransom than someone alive IMO.
Harvey Levin who received the 1st ransom note stated the grammar was “perfect grammatically and layered”. If we believe his judgment on this (he is an owner/editor of a media org - whatever we think of the org or him personally) then it would seem that someone very well educated wrote the 2 ransom notes.
Thoughts?
I've been wondering about the clothing and equipment worn by the perp in the nest doorbell camera footage and have been thinking along the same lines.
I think the perp is forensically aware based on the fact that he seems to be double (or triple) gloved and is wearing what looks to be new or near new clothing.
This may also explain why his equipment looks like it is new as well. He is very conscious of the potential for DNA transfer and is trying to reduce this risk. Based on the fact that he has demonstrated forensic awareness, I believe there is a high possibility that he would destroy all of the clothing and equipment once he finished the event.
This could also explain why he sought out clothing and equipment that is cheap and mass produced. Firstly, it would be harder for police to trace the purchase and secondly, he won't take a large financial hit for gear he intends to destroy.
I also think he was double masked based on the static nature of his facial expressions, the abnormally thick neckline and the "uncanny valley" almost plastic nature of the facial features as per the nest doorbell camera footage. If the perp was double masked, it would explain why he wasn't too panicked (as per body language displayed) about being spotted by the doorbell camera. This is in marked contrast to the fact that he took great pains to ensure that his motor vehicle was nowhere near the driveway before he disabled and removed the doorbell camera. The fact that he moved the vehicle to the point where NG's blood trail stops only after removing the camera indicates that the vehicle could be directly traced to the perp.
I also noticed that when the perp looked for something to assist with removing the nest camera, he immediately looked to the plant pot to the right of the front door before heading to the lantana. This pot contained a plant as recently as Nov 2025 (still looking for the google maps pic that another WS member posted displaying the pot with plant). It may indicate that he was casing NG's residence from a distance (either in person or via Google Maps/Streetview) well before the night of her disappearance. It could also be that he noticed the pot on his way to the front door that night so more evidence would be required to effectively demonstrate advance reconnaissance of NG's residence.
I think he planned his crime well in advance and, despite looking like a dollar shop cowboy, he was prepared to surmount the various obstacles in the way of his goal. It is telling imo that despite coming across something unexpected (nest camera), the perp still remained confident, methodically problem solved and continued to proceed with the abduction. Most criminals are deterred by a residence displaying obvious security devices but not this perp, he was determined.
All the above is JMO.