These independent denials from Pima County sheriff and the FBI confirm they are coordinating effectively on this investigation, IMO. They cast more doubt on the self-serving leaks alleging dysfunction and incompetence published by less-reliable outlets and attributed to insiders. The direct statement by the FBI and Pima County here contradict the supposed insider information.
Moreover, the sheriff's broad statement that the department does not engage in public speculation or leaks speaks to his 50-year career in law enforcement. I was not familiar with Sheriff Nanos beyond the disparaging comments from some outlets cited here.
These tweets prompted me to look into the sheriff's experience and career. The image I'd gotten from posts is that he is a bumbling, incompetent politician way over his head. I was surprised--and pleased--to learn Sheriff Nanos has had a 50-year career. He joined the Pima County Sheriff's Office in 1984, rising through the ranks from detective to chief of investigations to deputy chief, and then sheriff. He's been chief of the 1,500-member Pima County Sheriff's Office for 6 years. He holds a degree in public administration and criminal justice.
Nanos has extensive experience conducting and leading investigations into violent crimes. One example of a high-profile investigation he led is the assassination attempt on Rep. Gabby Giffords in Pima County in 2011. Giffords was shot in the head but survived. 6 constituents were killed in the rampage, 12 others were shot. For those who wonder why Savannah Guthrie contacted Mark Kelly on her way to the airport, the senator has firsthand experience with Nanos and the sheriff's office investigating violence against a family member.
Arizona Central's article on Nanos is balanced and objective. It goes through the allegations of corruption relied on here to paint him as a political hack. It links source documents you can read yourself. The articles and the documents I'm linking largely show allegations presented as proof of corruption or incompetence were determined to be unfounded by the Arizona Attorney General, judges, and investigations by the County Board of Supervisors.
I wondered if the allegations promoted by outlets that I consider less reliable may have some merit here. Reading reputable local reporting supported by official documents was eye-opening. My skepticism of self-serving, possibly politically motivated leaks was warranted. IMO.
Yes, my take is confirmation bias. That's why I am providing links to trusted local reporting and source documents. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion on this sheriff and his ability to lead this investigation. For anyone curious whether the characterizations carry weight, the links below may inform your opinion.
Free case summary of CROSS v. NANOS (2024). Includes facts, issue, holding, rule, reasoning, and summary of the United States District Court, District of Arizona’s decision.
www.studicata.com