- Joined
- Jan 13, 2017
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 2,329
This is the first day I’ve searched on the Pima County Inmate site but from now on, I’ll be checking daily!
Hopefully they are pursuing IGG on the DNA from inside the house.
As a married older woman in a good neighborhood where I've lived for 30 years I have to say I don't even answer the door during the day unless I look at Ring on my phone and it shows me it's someone I know. In the middle of the night I would look at my phone first plus, I don't know about Nest but with Ring I can also talk with whoever is out there. I just have a hard time (like many of us) imagining a mentally sharp but not as mobile 84 yr old answering the door in the middle of the night unless it's someone she knew well. (I'm not in any way insinuating it was family. IMO they had nothing to do with it). MOOI’ve also floated the idea that he used the flowers to try to lure her to the door but I’m just not sure. If she saw something weird on the cam would she really open the door to see what it was, as an 84 year old woman living alone at 1-2am? But I suppose it’s possible, if she’s felt comfortable and safe in that house and neighborhood for all these years.
moo
I can't believe the interest in the neighbor's camera on day what? 16. I would have thought that would be first day.I am also watching him ATM. Is it allowed to mention things we see in the live video from this person, or is that also against the rules? Just want to know, so I can do the right thing.
Thought it was interesting they were going through neighbors camera just a moment ago.
Seems to be a camera? Is he checking it with his phone? Like positioning it different ways to see what the video would look like?VIDEO: Here's a look at the two investigators who were just at Nancy Guthrie's neighbor's house.
I am watching NewsNation on tv, they just reported that the FBI used a ladder to access a camera or a light on the back of Nancy's home.
JMO as I have nothing to link to..
Glad they are on top of it. Even though this DNA is not in CODIS, I'm hopeful that LE will an close family member through DNA.I’m just hoping this is related to the dna in the house and not on that glove.
"Nancy was last seen on January 31 at 9:45 p.m. when her "daughter" dropped her off at her Catalina Foothills home in Tucson"
So now I know what Sheriff Nanos meant when he said "approximately" and "I can't stress this enough" about the dropping off of Nancy and the garage door opening and closing.
Statements like this should have been shared early on imo.
It would have cleared up much speculation.
One on One interview with Sheriff Nanos:
WATCH: One-on-One interview with Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos on Nancy Guthrie case
I may only hope that they recovered footage a while back and not just now.Seems to be a camera? Is he checking it with his phone? Like positioning it different ways to see what the video would look like?
Maybe the neighbors camera had something and they’re trying to confirm exactly where the something was?
Not NG’s house,the house next door, from the Mac Colson video tweet posted above.I am watching NewsNation on tv, they just reported that the FBI used a ladder to access a camera or a light on the back of Nancy's home.
JMO as I have nothing to link to..
That seems quite possible.Seems to be a camera? Is he checking it with his phone? Like positioning it different ways to see what the video would look like?
Maybe the neighbors camera had something and they’re trying to confirm exactly where the something was?
My thought exactly. The FBI put out a statement after the glove went through preliminary DNA analysis. My suspicion is it matched DNA in the house. Why else put out a statement on a random glove found 2 miles away?Wishful thinking. I can't see them flat out lying like that.
I don’t believe they’ve revealed that information.Can someone please refresh my memory, did we ever hear WHERE in NG’s home the unidentified DNA was located?
I ask because since we know that the DNA is not Nancy’s nor any family member’s, I’d have to assume it was in some out-of-the-way place?
Obviously Nancy’s DNA SHOULD be in her home, along with AG’s and TC’s, since they lived nearby and presumably were often in her house.
This may well have been explained 1000 pages ago, but at the moment I cannot recollect it.
TIA
Would you need to remove a camera to get the footage though? Is that common?That seems quite possible.
Hopeful about this possible lead.
JMO
LE has made a renewed appeal for any dates in January and perhaps people have now gone back to early January on their cams rather than the days right before and the night of the crime. JMOI can't believe the interest in the neighbor's camera on day what? 16. I would have thought that would be first day.
Interesting - it has gone from a glove, to a set of gloves