I posted my response before seeing your Scooby, thanks for posting this image. This is exactly what I was talking about. I wouldn't be surprised if there wasn't DNA left in the form of a drop(s) of saliva if the perp also used it while walking around in the house verses turning on the lights.
Maybe in a tiny, little print of the T&C's of Ancestory and GedMatch there is a box to check to opt out. IDK, I've not done either, but how many people read every single word of terms and conditions? I would say the percentage is high that it is just skimmed and accepted. I am guilty of that myself.
I’ve never stuck a flashlight in my mouth when I’ve needed light to work on something, but there are two people I know who do that regularly. They don’t worry about the on and off. Both have purchased high lumen flashlights that are small enough and also fit in a tool pouch. They have never considered going to the bite light. Old school, I guess.
I also remember reading this same explanation for the photo without pistol and backpack on this thread, very shortly after the video and stills were posted here. I do not remember if the poster provided a source. I kept hoping whomever posted this the first time would weigh in here again. If someone bookmarked that post, please speak up!
I'm still perplexed by this. What prompted the neighbor to call APS?
There is one brief moment in the FBI nest footage they have released, where as the perp has his back turned and is going for the lantana there APPEARS to be something sticking out of the R side of the backpack. I can’t tell what it is, if anything at all, and it very well could be shadow distortion. It bugs me. Here’s Left and right side views of the backpack.
This still picture is what leads me to think more than 1 individual is involved. if in fact it was taken the same night. In this picture there is a black strip on shoes that I don’t see on lantana suspect. Jacket appears to be camouflage. Face covering not tucked into jacket or different type or size. Also in this picture I notice more of a pooch in the belly area. The legs also appear a bit thinner. I’d say this suspect is older than lantana suspect. Interesting that he’s not also carrying a backpack, but I suppose no need when the backpack we do see is packed to the brim.
I do believe there is much more known by LE than we are aware of and that is how it should be. I feel that too much information has already been shared and regurgitated like phone tag. It's an active, ongoing criminal investigation, LE doesn't have a duty to inform the public at all. The positive exception being the releasing of the front door video in an effort to identify the perp.Not if perp destroys the pacemaker. These people are SICK!
I’ve been confused about the photo without the backpack. At first I thought it was explained that this photo was offered to give the public an idea of what suspect would look like without the weight of backpack…to get a better idea of body structure? There are definitely differences in shoes, mask and jacket in this still photo VS video. I’ve also found that this picture is much more difficult to find online than the video.
I might be mistaken, but I thought the sheriff said that a neighbor called Adult Protective Services. That sounds to me like someone reached out to them specifically, not that they attended as part of a law enforcement action. MOO
