- Joined
- May 15, 2010
- Messages
- 20,089
- Reaction score
- 55,556
'And honestly I didn't smell anything'. Another whooper. Who doesn't smell a decomposing body within five feet of 'em?
The jurors won't buy that one for a dime.
'And honestly I didn't smell anything'. Another whooper. Who doesn't smell a decomposing body within five feet of 'em?
As far as I can tell Sha is no longer in town. Considering she barely looked at her mother while she was on the stand, I get the feeling things are not good between them.
After everything before and after, she gave him $50,000. I'm still reeling at the thought of it. I can just see GH's face & hear him laffing all the way to the bank. Good golly. And you're right, Surfie, what might Sha have done with it? Or perhaps, AH could have bought a plane ticket to anywhere & set up housekeeping without that (IMO) worthless, lying, murdering slug.
Yes, electricity is necessary -- as I mentioned before, my DH has the same saw -- a SKIL brand reciprocating saw. They do not have a battery-powered model. It needs that 'lectric thang. And you can bet if those houses are vacant, there is no 'lectric in them. Oopsy, Mr. Def Atty.
Hi all! Just got interested in this trial about a week ago, and am finally catching up with you all! :wave:
How loud is the saw, borndem? If AH was in another room, could she hear the saw in the bathroom?
TIA!!
Live now! Judge reading movie synopses!
Ripley movie: says storyline has no parallel to this trial. Most of the viewing would be information which is irrelevant, confusing, and of no probative value.
People can testify as to parallels in Ripley's character to GH.
Stepford Wives up next. Both of these films are Hollywood, contrived. Reading reviews of the movie. Mentions all the reviews that said how funny and hilarious the movie was.
This case is not a comedy and there is no probative value to the movie. Objection sustained.
And now... back to the Dunn trial for a while. Yes, he'll be testifying. I'll catch up on this trial later and during breaks.
I just watched AH's testimony on WRAL - and having never seen her before - no exposure to the trial of Grant, etc. - I just have to say...
She had YEARS to formulate a good story. All those empty hours in jail where she could plot & plan and match up the weak points of her story, with the documented facts.
She could have done SO MUCH BETTER. Not that I'm complaining - she's made the State's case much easier to prove - but how can this woman (and I use that term loosely, no pun intended) really think that the jury is going to buy this bullchit? The painfully looooong and drawn out poopy explanation, ew. What self-respecting woman would let her house have a stopped up toilet for a couple days?! Knowing that she had a visitor coming (Laura) and knowing that she was sooooo intent upon appearing perfect...I just find that the most unbelievable explanation ever. It's pathetic.
Not only that - her "chick-fil-a" story, although rooted in truth, annoys me as well. Mainly because - they are so broke they are pawning everything but the kitchen sink...they are buying giftcards on AMEX to buy groceries - and she's eating out? That just shines a light on her personality - she does what she wants, when she wants to, and the final cost, monetary or otherwise, be damned.
Ugh. Her existence annoys me.
AH is cutting Becky off and it's driving me crazy. I want BH to tell her to please allow her to finish her question. I also want to slap AH out of that chair. I'm not a violent person but I absolutely detest this woman.
I noticed that too. She interrupts before the question has been asked. I think it's a tactic for taking control of the question and answer.
The gentlemen from the Houston dive team testified (sorry i can't remember his name) that he could smell decomposing body parts in the creek; so, how in the world does AH expect us to believe she didn't know all this was going down? defense must think jury is stupid.
I don't see Amanda crumbling under questioning. I would like to see the prosecutor set her up in a clear contradiction.