Well, this professor is a bit out of touch with the practical reality IMHO.
Most of the points that he mentions have already been done, or are being done - for instance, the info of the black boxes has been available for a while. Did you know that, Professor??
They way I experienced it, the investigation into the crash of MH17 started within a minute after the plane went down.
The night from July 17 to 18, I stayed awake on the internet, and before dawn, it was pretty clear what had happened, and how.
(I made it on time for lunch with a friend and I was surprised that the Dutch MSM had not picked up the story. The friend knew about the crash but nothing more.)
Last week, the Dutch Parliament debated with the PM about the decision to halt the mission in Ukraine.
To my surprise, serious MP's were worried that the team had been unable to reach only a small part of the disaster area, they were worried that many remains were left behind, they had not heard of the salvage done by 800 Ukranians, and they were not aware of the open source investigation.
As if the investigators would have to scour the entire area with magnifying glasses, almost like in the days of Sherlock Holmes.
:websleuther:
It was all the more surprising, because both the repatriation team and the investigation team had made known previously that they based many decisions on satellite info and sources from the internet. But somehow, our dear MP's missed it all.
:discuss::discuss:
raying:
