I do as well.I had a look on Twitter and sure enough the bloodlust is all in her direction right now. The usual ultra right wing brigade are in full swing.. I had to block about 100 accounts..I worry about her safety with this information out there.
Worried that someone will take justice into their own hands because it's taking too long and they believe she's guilty from what was released.
I really wish they had clarified whether they intend to charge her or believe she's innocent.
Or just objected to the released since it's still an active investigation.
Sheriff says he expects to deliver update on Las Vegas shooting soon
Updated January 13, 2018 - 3:57 pm
Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo said Saturday that he expects to have a news conference probably in a week to discuss the state of the investigation into the Oct. 1 mass shooting on the Strip. However, he added that he does not expect the update to include a keystone piece on gunman Stephen Paddocks motive.
The frustrating thing for me as head of the law enforcement has been the keyboard bandits, you know, the guys who sit on their couches at their home and Monday morning quarterback everything you do.
I have no clue either about guns, bullets cartridges bump stock or magazines..but I reckon they will have been able to trace where he purchased each by now and at least form a timeline of when she could have done it.
Other big question is, if she was his assistant, though we know she was not there while the massacre took place, whether she assisted as in the way you suggested, get them off the table- or instigator..
My hackles are well up on this one.. her prints on the bullets could well be more crazy thinking on the part of the authorities, being those with the information, deciding the public needs a scapegoat to take heat of Mr Lombardo and co or whether they have real reason to suspect she had a higher involvement than we know.
If she is innocent, I think its questionable ethics releasing the information that her prints were on the bullets, some bullets, unspecified bullets from an unspecified time..
I wish a proper journalist would interview her.
Is that actually how it went down? My understanding is that she immediately made herself available to the fBI on her return. My understanding is that a buccal swab was taken in the course of that first meeting.. Where is the blurt? Did she not just tell them having decided in advance to tell them?My biggest concern is not that she helped him load the magazines, necessarily. It's the fact that she didn't mention this information to the FBI until they obtained the DNA buccal swab from her and then she just blurted it out.
What is a tactical holographic gun accessory he got from amazon and used in the attacks?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
My biggest concern is not that she helped him load the magazines, necessarily. It's the fact that she didn't mention this information to the FBI until they obtained the DNA buccal swab from her and then she just blurted it out.
Oh wow. Terrifying.
She could have loaded those magazines months ago, thinking he was going to the range. I'm not sure I would think about telling LE this immediately if it wasn't very recent that I had done this. She may had no reason to believe that the bullets she loaded were used in this attack. We just don't know yet. It's something I may think to mention later down the line, but not immediately in the aftermath if I am simply in shock.My biggest concern is not that she helped him load the magazines, necessarily. It's the fact that she didn't mention this information to the FBI until they obtained the DNA buccal swab from her and then she just blurted it out.
Oh wow. Terrifying.
I also noticed he had glass cutters (there was lots of speculation about how he got through the window) and also that at home he had suitcases packed with ammo/ guns. That's exactly what I pictured. Rolling suitcases that had weapons, rather than clothes. No one would know any differently.
I am hoping accessing the ip addresses with those emails tells something. It was in July. So this was not a "snapped and shot" situation. Those emails definitely seem like code. "The eagle has landed" type of messages. Someone or someones are involved in this. This was not lone wolf.
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
This may be on topic or off-topic I'm not sure?
I recall a case a few years back where someone did something, either in the government or?, and they were using an email where other people knew how to log into it, and they saved stuff to send to each other as drafts. The co-conspirators then logged into the email account with their passwords, were able to see the drafts and delete the drafts so it never went through the server? Can somebody answer what I'm thinking of in my mind that I work all but can't remember?
Petraeus and lover used al-Qaeda email tricks to keep affair secret
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/wor...Qaeda-email-tricks-to-keep-affair-secret.html
For Doug Poppa's latest column click HERE
I am quoting myself to correct. I had thought that MD had set her sight to private a half hour after the breach. In reading the request for warrants she set her page to private 7 minutes before the breach. Also, in the paperwork it says that Paddock was registered to both rooms. There is no mention of MD being a guest in the room. Her players card was found in the room. I just don't how one goes from I know nothing to hearing tv reports of a shooting in Vegas and no names mentioned to setting thier facebook to private 7 minutes before the room was even entered.I have been reading back to some of the first reports on MD. In October 5 news stories she was considered a person of interest. What I remember, but cannot find the links to was that her passport had some type of travel hold. I would like to know of the status of either of those have been changed. Law enforcement was also saying that while she was being cooperaive they believe she was holding back information.
I find it suspicious that she set her sight to private a half hour after the room was breached. When was her name first mentioned on police radio? When they saw she wasn't in the room or when they saw that she was registered for the room?
MD reminds me of the Pulse shooters wife. I don't know if I believe she was an active participant in the plan or if she just knew about it and didn't say anything.
at this stage of the game, I think we keep an open mind..I am quoting myself to correct. I had thought that MD had set her sight to private a half hour after the breach. In reading the request for warrants she set her page to private 7 minutes before the breach. Also, in the paperwork it says that Paddock was registered to both rooms. There is no mention of MD being a guest in the room. Her players card was found in the room. I just don't how one goes from I know nothing to hearing tv reports of a shooting in Vegas and no names mentioned to setting thier facebook to private 7 minutes before the room was even entered.
at this stage of the game, I think we keep an open mind..
Sure MD appears to be the only 'witness' to who sP was.. his family are not credible.
That does not make her either guilty or a suspect but in light of the 'her fingerprints on the bullets' release from warrants which have been partially redacted and partially withheld, I think it's wise to hold the possibility that she is being set up as a fallguy/girl.
there's far too many questions and far too few answers.. See Tricia's first post with the vast list of unanswered questions..
Maybe we should consider attempting to answer those one at a time with what we know rather than rushing to chase what is possibly a propaganda witch hunt against a woman who was not in the country at the time of the mass killing?
We have info about the massive stock offloading.
We have discussed how LV appears to have it's own internal unspoken rules regarding law and order..
We have a mass of conflicting statements from LE.
We have an entire body of electronic information already destroyed by sP and unavailable to l.
We have a locked phone and no apparent published requests to manufacturer o help open it.!!!!!!
We have no information re possible motive.
We have what is possibly another red herring in the juvenile, badly written emails to his alleged self ..
We have nothing new to be going on with, this release- 'her fingerprints were on the bullets'.
I think there is good reason to be very wide in how we perceive the information dribble , information, which is not information..
There are several agendas here. Just need to identify them clearly..
Where's Cariis?
Is that actually how it went down? My understanding is that she immediately made herself available to the fBI on her return. My understanding is that a buccal swab was taken in the course of that first meeting.. Where is the blurt? Did she not just tell them having decided in advance to tell them?
I just need to be sure.
The FBI has coordinated with the Philippine office of the Interpol to look for her.
Lombardo added: Its an ongoing investigation and when I say I dont know, I may know. I assure you this investigation is not ended with the demise of Mr Paddock.
We wouldnt have to sit back and Monday morning quarterback as you said if you hadnt disgraced your uniform and badge by lying to the public and contradicting yourself, which by the way reflected on your entire department.
I am sure the dead, injured and their families will appreciate what you said, so its important for us to forget that and move on. They will never forget what happened. As for being resilient as you said, the survivors and the families of those who were murdered will never recover emotionally from that.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.