sonjay
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2014
- Messages
- 3,608
- Reaction score
- 118
There's still the possibility of Car #2-As-Road-Rager that could have road raged against the car with or without EN's explicit direction where it was tied to EN, but he was never in that car. I do not think that is the case that there was a road rager, but there's more than one way a road rager story could in theory be true.
Yeah, theoretically possible. But the road rage story has been so inconsistent from the very beginning that I just can't put any stock in it. The driving lesson/road rage story makes sense as a made-up story told instead of the true story, to cover up what really happened. As a made-up story, of course it's going to have tons of inconsistencies. But as an actual event that really happened? I just don't buy it.
There have been way too many inconsistencies. It was an accident; no, it was a near-accident; no, it was a sideswipe. There was an angry exchange of words; no, there was a threat to "come back later" for you and your daughter; no, there was a threat to "kill you and your daughter" and nothing about "later." It started on Villa Monterey; no, it started on Cimarron. It started because TM was driving the speed limit; no, it started because KM honked the horn. The silver car followed them home and shot TM; no, they escaped home safely and went back out to hunt for it. KM saw the silver car near their house after they got home; no, she didn't.
And why aren't the police still looking for the spiky-haired dude in the sketch?