D
Deleted member 117884
Guest
I'm completely unimpressed with their education. jmoI'm confused. Didn't Jr go to Wharton? Isnt' he some kind of VP of one of the various Trump businesses? How can he not know what GAPP or ASC is?
I'm completely unimpressed with their education. jmoI'm confused. Didn't Jr go to Wharton? Isnt' he some kind of VP of one of the various Trump businesses? How can he not know what GAPP or ASC is?
I think I know which one, but, tbh, I only know one word of the lyrics. Exactly one word.Every time I see one of Don Jr.'s videos, one particular Eric Clapton song gets stuck in my head.
He should brought the make-up pros from The Apprentice with him to court today. Shiney skin; he would have benefitted from a good nose powdering.I think I know which one, but, tbh, I only know one word of the lyrics. Exactly one word.
jmo
This is rich. I love it!
Hence their current pickle?How on earth do you run a “billion“ dollar business and not know a thing about running a business?
There is that!Hence their current pickle?
This civil lawsuit makes no sense to me because market valuation only matters when the owner wants to sell the property. If it is over-valued, nobody is going to buy it and the seller has to drop the price.But I thought Eric Trump only poured the concrete.
![]()
Why Donald Trump's children are testifying in his civil fraud trial
Donald Trump Jr is first to testify in a trial that could restrict the family's business in New York.www.bbc.com
Eric Trump, who oversaw luxury golf developments for a time, denied he had anything to do with the valuation of Trump golf courses. He asserted that "I pour concrete, I operate properties, I don't focus on appraisals" in a video of his deposition.
The Judge sounds mad. Perhaps because Trump has appealed his fraud ruling made before the trial even started?Only 15 minutes into what is expected to be a three-hour cross-examination, Judge Arthur Engoron snapped at defense lawyer Jesus Suarez for asking redundant questions.
"I see why this is going to take two or three hours. Some questions become three or four more questions," Engoron said, interrupting the cross-examination to request that Suarez shorten his questions.
That prompted Trump lawyer Chris Kise to criticize Engoron for placing an unfair standard on the defense team.
"You never give them speeches. You never limit their questions," Kise said about Engoron's approach to the attorney general's legal team. "I think it's unfair."
Kise stressed that the cross-examination of the state's sole expert witness is particularly important since his testimony is likely to play into the judge's calculation of Trump's potential fine.
"This witness is the only witness they have that even hints ... about ill-gotten gains," Kise said.
Engoron, however, refused to back down.
Defense assails judge after he tells them to speed up questioning
Every time I see one of Don Jr.'s videos, one particular Eric Clapton song gets stuck in my head.
It makes sense to lump those two into the same D.C. thread, imo. I think both the DC and the 14th Amendment cases have the best chances to succeed.I've been sticking 14th Amendment posts in the D.C. thread. But I think I also put them somewhere else at one point - maybe the J6 thread? I think the 14th Amendment cases could use their own thread, fwiw.
jmo
And this is why Trump never writes anything and why he makes the bank* come to his office to look at financials (but not let them take a copy). Look what happens when he does something that can be documented.....it becomes potential evidence against him.
We've all done it!Sorry, wrong thread. Carry on!
There's just a GAAP in his head where his brain should be.
The Trump Organization's fraudulent statements of financial condition may have cost banks more than $168 million in interest, which they could have made had they known the former president's true wealth, an expert hired by the New York attorney general's office testified on Wednesday.
<RSBM>
The prosecution alleges that they got deals on loans, ( I’ve read costing banks 168 million), that they wouldn’t have got without the increased value. Apparently this trial may be followed by criminal charges. It will be interesting to see if the banks do anything legally after this trial. This may depend on the amount given for disgorgement- will there be anything left for the banks to claw back?This civil lawsuit makes no sense to me because market valuation only matters when the owner wants to sell the property. If it is over-valued, nobody is going to buy it and the seller has to drop the price.
Also, the banks haven't filed lawsuits against Trump's Company.
Very weird.
JMO