NY NY - Equilla Lynn Hodrick, 8, Bronx, 12 Aug 1985

  • #21
So they may look close on the map they’re not that close to each other those two addresses however I lived on appeal is blocked at the time of the disappearance and there was a sex offender living on the same street who was targeting children in that age group. I’m not sure if anyone ever investigated that matter as for the ice cream truck I was told that they never found the driver because the Mr. softies trucks or privately owned and they have no way of knowing who was in the neighborhood at the time I agree that if they picked up the sent all the way to Metro North that she must have been on foot and not in a car however we don’t know with Home and the sightings at the video store seem unlikely it’s possible that whoever took her got her onto a train to get her far away quickly perhaps there was some pre-planning...

It's frustrating because, you're right, the two addresses aren't exactly close together... but they're not that far apart either.

Here's a map of the distance between the residences of Equilla (E. 194th & Briggs) and Jeremiah (2111 LaFontaine Ave), via E. 194th & Webster, where Equilla's scent was last picked up, by the Metro-North tracks. It's less than half-an-hour on foot—totally doable for someone who likes to walk, especially in the summer when it's light out till around 8:30 p.m. Could it have been someone that lived in between those addresses?

The scent thing bothers me a bit. Although the Fordham train station is about two blocks away, I doubt a kidnapper would've taken a kid aboard a train where there would be witnesses. August 12, 1985 was a Monday so there could've still been people commuting home from later shifts in the city.

I feel like the only reason a kidnapper would go there is to dispose of a body. As we observed in the Carlos Diaz thread, Metro-North runs "underground," meaning at a lower level than the regular sidewalk; it's not covered. It's also not a closed system, like the subway. Tickets are marked on board Metro-North trains so anyone can enter the station, and from there walk to the trees and bushes that separate it from the street. Here are some pictures to show what I mean.

As for Jeremiah, there was a park nearby where his remains could've been disposed of, assuming this is what happened. And, of course, the Botanical Gardens to the east could've also been chosen to discard remains.
 
  • #22
Bumping this thread for Equilla.
 
  • #23
  • #24
There is a youtube channel the alleges that Equilla mother had an ex boyfriend who was a drug addict at the time and had an apartment in Yonkers. The documentary also states that there was a homeless women that told the lead detective that the girl is not alive and buried in Yonkers NY. The Detective was unable to find this homeless woman that made the claim.


It is possible Equilla could of gotten on the Metro North Train with someone she knew or was familiar with
 
  • #25
Thanks for highlighting this case. This was news to me. Been trying to find info about this online for years but unfortunately this info was never made public before.

I do think the ex boyfriend could have been responsible but with no physical evidence or confession we may never know.
 
  • #26
There is an article on medium.com based on the interview with Detectice McDonald, here are some snippets about the boyfriend from Yonkers.


One Saturday afternoon, some months after the disappearance, a block party took place on East 194th Street. Local politician Fernando Ferrer thanked the neighbourhood for all its effort towards finding Equilla, and encouraged them to keep working. He introduced Detective McDonald, and announced the phone number which members of the public should call if they had information.

As McDonald walked back to his car from the block party, he passed by an old woman rooting through a garbage can. She called out to him as he walked by: “You’re never gonna find that little girl alive. She is buried up in Yonkers.”

McDonald initially ignored her, assuming she was speaking nonsense — he knew the woman to be a bit of a “nut”. It was only on his way back to the 52nd Precinct that he fully realized the significance of what she’d said. Yonkers. He rushed back and asked residents if they’d seen where the woman had gone, but nobody could find her.

Under other circumstances, he might have brushed it off. But the fact that the woman had mentioned Yonkers of all places concerned him. At one point, Terona Hodrick had dated a man who sometimes stayed in a house on Briggs Avenue, but mostly spent his time in an apartment in Yonkers. While Terona didn’t touch drugs — she wouldn’t want to expose Equilla to them — this boyfriend was described as a “junkie”.

The evening of Equilla’s disappearance, the boyfriend had been seen running, shirtless, on Hoe Avenue, only a few blocks away from the Hodricks’ home. Later that night, witnesses had seen him in a red car, accompanied by another man. Through interviewing at least a dozen people, McDonald managed to determine that the other man in the car was the boyfriend’s roommate in Yonkers.

McDonald brought this boyfriend in for interrogation many times in the first few months of the investigation. The detective would question him late into the night, but without any result. One time, McDonald thought he’d made a break. He asked the boyfriend how he could live with what he’d done. He told him how Equilla’s little face would haunt him every night, never letting him forget.

The boyfriend then began to sob, deep and anguished. He slowly looked up, and began to speak. McDonald thought he was finally going to confess. But all he said was, “I didn’t do nothing.”

None of these interrogations ended up providing any information, nor did the interrogations of the Yonkers roommate. As for the homeless woman, McDonald, despite searching for the next several months, was never able to locate her. He thought that she might have died, or ended up in an institution. But he never forgot the incident: How did the woman know about Yonkers? What else could she have told him?

Even though time had passed, there was one suspect he had never been able to bring himself to count out: Terona’s Yonkers boyfriend. But the detective could never prove anything to truly implicate him, nor any other suspect.

Finally, McDonald retired from the NYPD in January of 1987, after a career of about 20 years. A week before before his official retirement day, he took one last look through the folder on Equilla’s case. By this point, it weighed 25 pounds.

Then, he paid Terona Hodrick a visit and told her he was turning in his badge. Upon hearing the news, she didn’t cry — she didn’t have any tears left. She just shook her head slowly, and sighed: “Well, that’s the end of it.”

“She was right,” said McDonald later. “After I left, there wasn’t much more to be done, although every effort was made by the Police Dept. to find her daughter.”

After retiring, he took a job as the head of security at Pace University. He still considers not being able to find Equilla the worst disappointment of his career. Even now, he’s never stopped thinking about the little girl he came to know and love, but never got to meet. “Everything that could have been done was done. We tried. We really tried.”

1*SpUmrYEd0MggPbEPpGuVyg.png

Equilla Hodrick (credit: Daily News from New York)
 
  • #27
Thinking of Equilla today.
 
  • #28
I have the impression that she may have been deceived. When she ran after the ice cream truck, she had no money. Perhaps a stranger offered to buy her ice cream? They may have gained her trust this way and brought her to the arcade to play. I think this, because if she didn't have money for ice cream, then someone must have been paying for her to play in the arcade, right?

One thing that stood out to me was that she ran after the ice cream truck, and then it wasn't until the night that her mom heard that she had been seen in the arcade. Was it normal for Equilla to escape for hours? Did she have friends in the area that she would normally run away with? Was it normal for her to be alone in an arcade until late at night? If not, this supports my idea that someone probably accompanied her there. I wonder if anyone who worked in the arcade could back up this claim. If she lived right down the block and frequented the arcade regularly, maybe a worker would have recognized her. Did the investigators ask the ice cream man if she had seen it? She would probably remember a little girl asking for free ice cream, right?

Eventually, she ended up at the subway station. If my theory were true, it might be possible that this person who spent the entire afternoon playing with her and buying her ice cream convinced her to go somewhere secondary with them (perhaps to have dinner or visit a toy store or something?). . Equilla was very cunning, they said, so I doubt she would get on a train with a stranger. but after spending the whole afternoon together, maybe he didn't feel like strangers anymore? Or maybe it was someone she recognized from her neighborhood.

As for the Yonkers comment... I wonder if in the subway station the dogs lead the detectives to heads in that direction?

This is all speculation, of course.

the ice cream man said that he didn't see Equilla that day... but maybe he just doesn't remember her, or if someone offered to pay for her ice cream, maybe they ordered it for her?
 
  • #29
Bumping up for Equilla.
 
  • #30

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
138
Guests online
2,457
Total visitors
2,595

Forum statistics

Threads
632,507
Messages
18,627,771
Members
243,174
Latest member
daydoo93
Back
Top