Ut oh, "dad's car" was used. I hope it doesn't get messy for the elder Rackover.
http://abc7ny.com/news/timeline-deta...attan/1614077/
http://abc7ny.com/news/timeline-deta...attan/1614077/
I have a lot of gay friends. Meth is huge in the gay community and is used as a sex drug. If were are drugs at the party, there is a very good chance meth was involved - not exclusively, but present.
As well, when they say Rackover sr met Rackover jr at a 'health club', I'm almost certain they mean a mens bathhouse.
Sent from my SM-G935W8 using Tapatalk
Maybe so. But, I had to change my kid's name and it was not so easy. The younger Rackover is the only one who can begin the process. Now, if "dad" wants to pay him to do so, then, it might go very fast. The younger Rackover has no legal ties to the "dad" because he couldn't be adopted. So unless they have some other partnership agreement (domestic or business) who ever owns the home owns the home or if there is a binding agreement between the two that "dad' could recall the name. In the end the criminal Rackover would need to consent to the name change.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/n...bodys-disposal-in-new-jersey-emerge.html?_r=0
James's attorney is vigorously contesting the charges.
Sounds like the three females might have been Joey's friends. Anyone else reading it that way?
jmo
That holds true for us common folk. Jeffrey is friends with president elect and future first lady. IMO He can and will get it done ASAP.
I can't imagine the president-elect would put his toes in this water to manipulate the system. Even Rudy Guiliani is trying to get Mr. Trump to see legal boundaries. They would be foolish to get anywhere near him, it would be part of a swamp issue.
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/19/n...bodys-disposal-in-new-jersey-emerge.html?_r=0
James's attorney is vigorously contesting the charges.
The fact that the parent-child relationship [or lack thereof] is not splashed across the front page of the NY Post our Daily News speaks volumes about the level of influence, power and respect Jeffrey Rackover has earned over the years. When it's mentioned in NY news reports it's buried in the story and treated with kid gloves.I can't imagine the president-elect would put his toes in this water to manipulate the system. Even Rudy Guiliani is trying to get Mr. Trump to see legal boundaries. They would be foolish to get anywhere near him, it would be part of a swamp issue.
Maybe so. But, I had to change my kid's name and it was not so easy. The younger Rackover is the only one who can begin the process. Now, if "dad" wants to pay him to do so, then, it might go very fast. The younger Rackover has no legal ties to the "dad" because he couldn't be adopted. So unless they have some other partnership agreement (domestic or business) who ever owns the home owns the home or if there is a binding agreement between the two that "dad' could recall the name. In the end the criminal Rackover would need to consent to the name change.
Legally changed:Had his name been changed legally or is he just using that name.
I know this is gong to sound insensitive but if his murder was not a major news story would the team be doing this?Hockey team will honor slain Stamford man
By Liz Skalka, Darien News
Friday, November 18, 2016
Josephs's hockey team is retiring his No. 9 jersey. According to his coach, who knew him since he was seven or eight years old,
He was a great leader and he always gave it his all every time he stepped on the ice,
...
He was a fierce competitor but the second the game was over he would shake everyones hand.
...
He was part of that whole group who grew up together and played youth hockey,
Legally changed:
“The kid legally changed his name to Rackover,” Dietl said. “He let him do that because he cared about this kid so much. He was the son that Jeffrey never had.”
SOURCE:
https://www.google.com/amp/nypost.c...er-and-trying-to-hide-his-corpse/amp/?0p19G=e
I know this is gong to sound insensitive but if his murder was not a major news story would the team be doing this?
From a public relations standpoint, the team would have been wise to hold off until additional details emerge in order to avoid the possibility of having to retract this gesture.
That being said, I'm all for thoughtful remembrances and groups honoring former members but there's something somewhat distasteful about doing it before the victim's even buried because it strikes me as a cheap publicity grab by the team rather than a thoughtful, well planned remembrance.