You're asking one of the most important questions, IMO. At this point, we need some big clues to help the sheriff figure this out. (He may not know the people on this forum are brilliant.)
I admit, without confirmed facts, I'm desperately coming up with any scenario I can imagine. I searched and found several stores still open at 9 p.m. or later around there.
Why would it hurt the search or investigation to know if she purchased something and if it was still in her car? I'm under the impression she disappeared immediately upon arriving at the campsite, but we haven't been supplied with enough info to support that, IMO.
Link isn't working for me via Tapatalkhttp://www.twcnews.com/nys/capital-region/news/2016/07/1/search-for-missing-wells-woman-ongoing.html?cid=facebook_YNN-Albany
Hmm...more information about her going for a hike. Interesting.
Link isn't working for me via Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Hmmm, what?? So strange to have withheld that. I don't know what to think. I'm not ruling out suicide here but I hope not.
Hmmm, what?? So strange to have withheld that. I don't know what to think. I'm not ruling out suicide here but I hope not.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
Why is no one wondering if she fell in the water? Obviously it is a possibility or there would've have been no need for divers. It could be a tragic accident, nothing more.
Please come home safe Rachael!
I see someone else got to it before I did. Thanks lightlady! We need to know if this is true.
As I stated yesterday morning, LE needs to hold a press conference and state the facts. Saying she was going for a hike versus doors left open, car running, etc., would definitely lead to different search areas! At least some of them, I would think. That's not to say it's impossible for her to be going for a hike and then be abducted, but it seems less likely. As far as the suicide topic...ehh... I'm not sure I'm ready to subscribe to that theory just yet. But I will say that if that is the case, it seems likely that they will find her.
IMO. And as an aside -- this timeline needs to be adjusted if this hike text did happen. There's no way she'd be going for a hike at 9:15-9:30 at night! So either she texted that to her parents and then was seen in the town of Wells during this time frame and somehow her car still got back to her house OR she was seen in Wells at 9:15-9:30, drove her car back to her house, and then texted her parents the next morning. No way she'd hike in the dark. IMO.
Or maybe when she texted Wednesday night she said she was going to hike in the morning?
Vastly different stories. [emoji53]
Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk
So Rachael ate dinner at her parent's house the evening of her disappearance then drove the 45 minute drive to Wells stopping at a store along the way? Who saw her in Wells at 9:15 pm? The clerk in the store?
So, two totally conflicting stories. The first was that on the 22nd she had dinner with her folks, drove to Wells, was seen in town approx 915, and called mom from entrance to property stating that she was home.
So depressing to read the sheriff's statement. I'm totally frustrated trying to figure out how this beautiful young woman disappeared. Her parents and friends are frantic to find her. Her mother seems to think she was abducted.
If someone was on foot and dragged her to another camp, I'd think dogs would've tracked her. If someone followed her in a car or ATV, I'd think she would've noticed, but that's still a possibility. I feel it's important the Sheriff hold a formal press conference soon and share every bit of info and answer questions. Show the location of the camper. People want to help, but need the facts confirmed. DON'T GIVE UP!
Hmmm, what?? So strange to have withheld that. I don't know what to think. I'm not ruling out suicide here but I hope not.
Sent from my SM-G930V using Tapatalk
I see someone else got to it before I did. Thanks lightlady! We need to know if this is true.
As I stated yesterday morning, LE needs to hold a press conference and state the facts. Saying she was going for a hike versus doors left open, car running, etc., would definitely lead to different search areas! At least some of them, I would think. That's not to say it's impossible for her to be going for a hike and then be abducted, but it seems less likely. As far as the suicide topic...ehh... I'm not sure I'm ready to subscribe to that theory just yet. But I will say that if that is the case, it seems likely that they will find her.
IMO. And as an aside -- this timeline needs to be adjusted if this hike text did happen. There's no way she'd be going for a hike at 9:15-9:30 at night! So either she texted that to her parents and then was seen in the town of Wells during this time frame and somehow her car still got back to her house OR she was seen in Wells at 9:15-9:30, drove her car back to her house, and then texted her parents the next morning. No way she'd hike in the dark. IMO.
I don't know anything about the neighbor but I assume they have been checked out and if so I would think they are a little uneasy until there are answers of what happened to Rachael.I did read an article that said a neighbor did not see a car "other than the one Rachael was driving" to raise suspicions. Do we think this is the witness who saw her around 9:15-9:30? Maybe they saw her car coming up the street and glanced up, noticed it was her, and then thought nothing more of it because it was a car they recognized.