Loomis, you crack me up! Love your posts. I can always count on you to call em like ya see em. I like that!
Thank you, GoBuckeyes! That's just how I am!
Loomis, you crack me up! Love your posts. I can always count on you to call em like ya see em. I like that!
He thinks he's going to win thisIt's called ARROGANCE He is proud of what he has accomplished. My opinion.
Is this your opinion?
Maybe he thinks, but I don't think he KNOWS that. As a matter of fact, if he keeps grinning like that, the Jury will surely convict him for all 8 counts of aggravated murder and all the charges that follow. JMO
He thinks he's going to win this
In Count 21 Obstructing Justice does anyone think this is referring to Fred and Rita giving GJ testimony?
"...did destroy or conceal physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold testimony or information, or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence..."
CC, do you mean in Jake's indictment?
Count 21 in all 4 Wagner's Indictments says:
(The 4 Wagners)....to benefit from the commission of a crime, did destroy or conceal
physical evidence of the crime or act, or induce any person to withhold testimony or information or to elude legal process summoning the person to testify or supply evidence, and/or did communicate false information to any person, and/or the crime(s) committed by the said.....(the 4 Wagners)
I think in this Count 21, the "person" being referred to is Fred and Rita in regards to their GJ testimony.
The Wagner 4 tried to influence Fred and Rita's GJ testimony. Why else would Fred and Rita be listed in the indictments as co-conspirators in the Count of Engaging in a Pattern of Corrupt Activity?
Fred and Rita are listed on the Pattern of Corrupt Activity Count but they are not indicted for it like the Wagner 4 are. I find that interesting and was wondering if anyone else had thoughts about it.
Just curious what others might think.
...Just my take on it. Opinion only...
![]()
It should also be pointed out that Grand Juries are selected weeks ahead of when they will serve, and usually serve a week at a time over several months. Criminal indictments have to come down in a short time, like 10 days of being accused or arrested. So there is rarely any way someone with a personal vendetta could serve on a GJ and force an indictment. This is designed to take the "personal effect" out of the equation.
Hope I said all that correctly - going on memory.
I think this is what your referring to:
"..Less is known about the case, in which the pair was ordered to have no contact with Rocky Mountain Boot Company.
A criminal complaint alleged they altered, destroyed, concealed or removed evidence in an investigation.
Public records give few additional details, and Pike County Prosecutor Rob Junk, who is handling the charges in the Rhoden massacre, said by email he couldn't recall the tampering case details.
Junk moved in 2009 to dismiss the charges against both Wagners "due to the case not being presented to grand jury awaiting results from BCI," according to the records.
"Could be any number of reasons for it not being presented," Junk wrote regarding the tampering case. "There may not have been a completed case from the investigating agency, or there wasn't enough evidence even to take it to grand jury, or a possible victim didn't want to pursue."
Pike County: Father accused in Rhoden massacre faced prior felonies
Sure makes sense!! However, I think the 4 Ws are totally guilty of the first part of that sentence, thus it would be "and" rather than "or." Does that make sense? JMO
This is great thanks Loomis. This Newsome Case has weighed heavily on those of us who have been closely following the Rhoden and Gilley Case.VERY interesting article about the Newsome murders
Details limited in Newsome murders - Portsmouth Daily Times
This is great thanks Loomis. This Newsome Case has weighed heavily on those of us who have been closely following the Rhoden and Gilley Case.
Many of us wondered if there was a connection between these 2 cases, and worried that the Newsome Case would go cold. Now an arrest has been made! Hopefully more information will be forth coming.
In the event that more information becomes available, I have started a thread for it here:
Ohio Arrest in Candy and Kristina Newsome Murders
For those not familiar:
On Jan. 4, 2016, Candy Newsome, 48, and her 16-year-old-daughter, Kristina "Mykal" Newsome, were found dead of apparent gunshot wounds at a home in Lucasville Ohio. The mother and daughter were killed execution style, investigators say.
Recent development:
SCIOTO COUNTY, Ohio (WSAZ) -- UPDATE 10/4/19 @ 10 p.m.
A man from Lucasville faces two aggravated murder charges in connection with the deaths of a mother and daughter who were gunned down nearly four years ago at a home along Blue Run Road in Lucasville.