D
Deleted member 237253
Guest
So do you think the Wagner's past charges will be brought up at trial?
One can hope as it dispels the idea that the W clan were good god fearing law abiding citizens. Jmo
So do you think the Wagner's past charges will be brought up at trial?
So do you think the Wagner's past charges will be brought up at trial?
So do you think the Wagner's past charges will be brought up at trial?
Gosh Hope So! She sure has a history. Bet we get more to fill in gaps... and got to figure LE had all this before the arrest.
Please forgive me--my mind is a little muddy....Just to get it straight in my head--is the AW referred to in the above case one and the same AW that is charged with the Rhoden/Gilley murders or is it a different AW?
I'm confused now. Does this mean AW has other children besides JW and GW4?
So do you think the Wagner's past charges will be brought up at trial?
Well then the gun arrest is proof that they owned handguns and not just rifles for hunting. They told the Alaskan neighbor they owned one shot gun.Yes, if they are relevant. JMO
Please forgive me--my mind is a little muddy....Just to get it straight in my head--is the AW referred to in the above case one and the same AW that is charged with the Rhoden/Gilley murders or is it a different AW?
Well then the gun arrest is proof that they owned handguns and not just rifles for hunting. They told the Alaskan neighbor they owned one shot gun.
The stolen property arrests shows they have no problem with theft which is what happened to the Rhoden's security cameras and phones.
No, it is a different AW, go to Volusia County Florida Clerk and look at Case Number: 1994 33575 FMCI for information then look in docket entries.
No, it is a different AW, go to Volusia County Florida Clerk and look at Case Number: 1994 33575 FMCI for information then look in docket entries.
Then go to 94DR000489 WAGNER, ANGELA vs. CAMPFIELD, THOMAS W in Ross County OHIO Court of Common Pleas. Everyone is free to research further in detail rather than take the word of anyone else. Draw your own conclusions. JMO
Oh I agree, and I hope anyone interested will do just that.![]()
So, what's your take on the Ohio case? A woman in Florida who happens to have an Ohio attorney and an Ohio defendant? And both Plaintiff and Defendant have local ties to Chillicothe.
My take on the Attorneys (John Street and Jeff Benson) is they represented this AW through the court in Volusia County. In docket entries (Florida case) you can clearly see that the AW was sent letters from the court with the last name of Warren as she had gotten a divorce from a S. Wagner.
My take on the Attorneys (John Street and Jeff Benson) is they represented this AW through the court in Volusia County. In docket entries (Florida case) you can clearly see that the AW was sent letters from the court with the last name of Warren as she had gotten a divorce from a S. Wagner.
My take on the Attorneys (John Street and Jeff Benson) is they represented this AW through the court in Volusia County. In docket entries (Florida case) you can clearly see that the AW was sent letters from the court with the last name of Warren as she had gotten a divorce from a S. Wagner.
My take on the Attorneys (John Street and Jeff Benson) is they represented this AW through the court in Volusia County. In docket entries (Florida case) you can clearly see that the AW was sent letters from the court with the last name of Warren as she had gotten a divorce from a S. Wagner.