LOL! Where do you get this stuff?
EA's testimony never once mentioned she saw or even knew of GW having any girlfriends (or friends that are girls). She testified about the lack of privacy in the home, specifically when it came to inappropriate questions or comments about sex, addressed directly to her or discussed in her presence. As one example, she recalled a conversation GW & BW had (while she was in the same room) about how they had used "*advertiser censored*" for sex.
And why would anyone find it "disturbing" if EA assumed JW & AW were a couple? What am I missing here?
EA was a phenomenal witness. Every single reporter, Tweeter, blogger & vlogger I saw RAVED about her. The big takeaway the rest of us got is how her testimony echoed Tabitha's experience within the household and was reminiscent of Hannah's experience (demonstrated through texts). So we're seeing family dynamics from the inside of the household as a whole -- repeated now 3 times. That's a big deal. Two of the women barely escaped with their lives, one did not. Whether or not George was singled out in her testimony, George was still part of that household and very much part of their experience.
Maybe the difference is, you're waiting for evidence of what George did while I'm looking straight at evidence of what George did not do. George did not intervene, defend or try to protect any of these girls living in the same household. Not even his own wife.