Hey everyone,
Just a reminder that we do not allow AI-generated posts to be used as factual information. AI often gets things wrong, so we have to be very careful.
Using AI for inconsequential purposes is fine — for example, organizing your own notes, helping with wording, or asking general questions that do not change or establish facts in a case.
I ask AI for facts of cases all the time because it is hard to remember everything but then I source those facts myself with a Google search. I only include facts that I know are correct and the only way I can check AI facts is to source them myself.
However, when AI is used to present factual information about a case, those posts will be blurred. You can still read them, but they cannot be used as factual evidence in the discussion.
Here are a couple of examples of why this matters.
I was writing a post for Websleuths. I asked for a list of what happened on this day in history on Jan. 20th.
It gave me this story about a man who stole a tank and drove it all around a city. Except it happened on June 6th, not Jan 20th. When I asked how it got the date so wrong, it said, "I accidentally pulled the wrong date." LOL
I once asked AI whether Olivia Newton-John and Karen Carpenter were best friends. Don’t ask me why — I did. The answer I got was: “Yes, they were so close they even attended each other’s funerals.”
AI can be an amazing tool, but please use it carefully. When it comes to true crime, facts matter.
Thanks.
Tricia