- Joined
- Oct 30, 2005
- Messages
- 3,916
- Reaction score
- 16,006
Let's think about this. We've been asking why anyone would abduct/kill a whole family. Think about how the circumstances of drawing up a new will changes the situation.
If someone knew Bobby Dean was dying, he or she might have no idea that a new will would be made, or that a will made given the circumstances of the family's disappearance could go unchallenged. The assumption might have been that he would not make a change, hoping that the family would be FOUND or that the contingencies in the will (if the heirs predeceased him) would just kick in. Most wills have these contingencies, e.g., if the principal heir dies or at the same time as the person with the will, there are clauses that say what happens next. My dad's will had a complex clause about what would happen if he and my mother died at the same time, etc. Maybe someone wanted the family out of the way as heirs, but not definitively dead. Hence the disappearance. Is the estate big enough for this sort of machinations?
If someone knew Bobby Dean was dying, he or she might have no idea that a new will would be made, or that a will made given the circumstances of the family's disappearance could go unchallenged. The assumption might have been that he would not make a change, hoping that the family would be FOUND or that the contingencies in the will (if the heirs predeceased him) would just kick in. Most wills have these contingencies, e.g., if the principal heir dies or at the same time as the person with the will, there are clauses that say what happens next. My dad's will had a complex clause about what would happen if he and my mother died at the same time, etc. Maybe someone wanted the family out of the way as heirs, but not definitively dead. Hence the disappearance. Is the estate big enough for this sort of machinations?