Another thing that niggles me...why the absolute proliferation of evidence in SO many locations (cell phone deposited near apts., mulitple ATM and gas transactions, car left at Wal Mart, some belongings in trash receptacles in two different places near her car, one car mat left at the park, etc.)...and with all that...the deliberate removal of just ONE of the two license plates, leaving it on Larch Mt. (which discovery--how?--prompted search which led to body). It's almost as if the perp(s) wanted to leave a trail that would 1) establish plenty of evidence of where the car had been, and 2) drop evidence that would lead church members (or other searchers) to her body before too much time passed.
Unanswered, too, is the question about the first 'tip' that led police to first question Holt. I have no doubt there is evidence tying Holt to the car and crime; I just wonder if the case is more contrived, somehow...