Secret Service acting director Ronald Rowe just said in a press briefing that Trump's campaign rally in Butler, Pa., was the first time counter-snipers were deployed to serve on the former president's security detail.
We need a barf emoji. Couldn't help but wonder what Rand Paul was thinking listening to that.I have a link!
I find this mystifying. How hard is it to give everyone radios and get everyone on the same channel? Isn't that what police depts do?This whole issue of communication among law enforcement entities at major events and during major crises just really makes me angry. This has been discussed for years now, and it still seems like little progress has been made.
In 2007, after the Virginia Tech campus shooting that killed 33 people, task forces were formed in states across the country to address campus safety and issues that we learned from the Virginia Tech mass shooting. At the time, I was working at a university in Ohio and was appointed to represent our university on the Governor's Task Force on Campus Safety that was established immediately after the Virginia Tech incident. We had many statewide meetings, including meetings with leaders from Virginia Tech's campus security team. One of the things that came up at these meetings, over and over again, was the need for improved and coordinated communication abilities among different law enforcement agencies. That was in 2007. It is now 2024. And the SS are still having this problem? Seventeen (17) years ago the communications problem among various LE entities in crisis events was highlighted as needing to be resolved. I find it amazing that it is still a problem among SS and state LE and local LE. It should be obvious and a no-brainer that this is critical - one of the most critical issues - for law enforcement in a crisis situation that they plan for when providing protection for our presidents and other VIP leaders.
Based on how effective (and quick) alert spectators using their loud voices were at drawing LE attention to the shooter on the roof, even having MEGAPHONES would have served better than what the SS was using that day.I find this mystifying. How hard is it to give everyone radios and get everyone on the same channel? Isn't that what police depts do?
SBMSecret Service acting director Ronald Rowe just said in a press briefing that Trump's campaign rally in Butler, Pa., was the first time counter-snipers were deployed to serve on the former president's security detail.
Thanks for that. There are an insane number of roofs and other high points within 1000 yard radius there.This was last week but I'm not sure if it got posted on here.
Ita.I find this mystifying. How hard is it to give everyone radios and get everyone on the same channel? Isn't that what police depts do?
Well, that just brings up a whole lot more questions than answers. jmoSecret Service acting director Ronald Rowe just said in a press briefing that Trump's campaign rally in Butler, Pa., was the first time counter-snipers were deployed to serve on the former president's security detail.
Yes a volunteer town crier on the roof with an umbrella, cooler and a bullhorn would have sufficed and cost nothing.Based on how effective (and quick) alert spectators using their loud voices were at drawing LE attention to the shooter on the roof, even having MEGAPHONES would have served better than what the SS was using that day.
(bolded by me) "Special" is a kinder word than I would have usedIt takes a special person to shot another person. I agree with holding as many as they can and fire or demote their snipers because they have issues with their bosses.
Well, that just brings up a whole lot more questions than answers. jmo
Time for an independent financial audit imo....MOOFirst, it appears that none of those billions of dollars were paid to US SS counter-snipers to protect Trump.
I guess taxpayers should be studying this data a little closer? And asking for more detailed receipts.
USAspending.gov
I posted the letter yesterday that the Finance Congressional committee sent. They want to know who got protection how much they spent how many protectings I mean complete details.Time for an independent financial audit imo....MOO
You know this isn't rocket science. If you are going to create an emergency network system you test it. You go through a real time test, incorporating a staged emergency and have all your response team treat it as real.It was an issue in Uvalde! Radios did not work indoors. Uvalde was set up with a rural long range emergency network that was designed after 911. Unfortunately it didn't work indoors.
You know this isn't rocket science. If you are going to create an emergency network system you test it. You go through a real time test, incorporating a staged emergency and have all your response team treat it as real.
I worked for a ministry in Canada that had a section called the Emergency Measures response. They used to sit around spit balling all sorts of catastrophic situations where you'd have mass casualties. Everything from plane crashes in densely populated areas, train derailments with noxious substances, natural disasters like floods, etc. They hired volunteers to act as victims who display injuries similar to those in plane crashes, etc and have EMT's treat the 'patients' to gauge how quickly they respond.
It tests everything from a standby situation to actual implementation. It is the reason why, back in 1979 Mississauga, a suburb of Toronto, experienced an actual train derailment where the train was carrying hazardous chemicals that caught fire. A coordinated effort of several police forces evacuated over 200,000 citizens without any injuries or deaths. It was called the Mississauga Miracle.
I remembered with disbelief how the response for the victims of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico was a shambles because all the prep work ever done for emergency responses to catastrophic damage created by hurricanes had only ever focused on the contiguous United States.