- Joined
- Dec 16, 2009
- Messages
- 486
- Reaction score
- 1,605
Please release the Cold Case file. That’s how crimes are solved. Thanks.
It was leaked, so some of it is out.Please release the Cold Case file. That’s how crimes are solved. Thanks.
It was leaked, so some of it is out.
It was a lot.Of the information that was revealed, it wasn't much. JMO, some important evidence wasn't followed up on. Important questions left unanswered.
We don’t know what LE ran down and ruled out. Nor do we know what leads or angles they didn’t follow through on sufficiently. It’s very possible they tracked down that VG account real fast and it was for any number of explainable purposes like alimony, money to his daughter, money to PF, charitable donation, etc. That’s probably the most frustrating thing about this case - we have no idea what LE found out about a lot of things they investigated, so we’re left to speculate and think about probability.It was a lot.
The financial stuff was not followed up, but we do know about the unknown account "VG."
Except they did not, according to the report. Transfer to an unknown account.We don’t know what LE ran down and ruled out. Nor do we know what leads or angles they didn’t follow through on sufficiently. It’s very possible they tracked down that VG account real fast and it was for any number of explainable purposes like alimony, money to his daughter, money to PF, charitable donation, etc. That’s probably the most frustrating thing about this case - we have no idea what LE found out about a lot of things they investigated, so we’re left to speculate and think about probability.
I would venture to guess that was their initial report. It didn’t say that was the end of the road and they exhausted all investigative options to arrive at that “unknown” descriptor.Except they did not, according to the report. Transfer to an unknown account.
Bank accounts are tied to SSN's. They could determine all accounts under RFG's SNN in the US.I would venture to guess that was their initial report. It didn’t say that was the end of the road and they exhausted all investigative options to arrive at that “unknown” descriptor.
I wonder how much more of the copied casefile RK has/had that she didn’t release. Any guess on that?
Thanks for these JJ. They seemed to be trying to cover all the bases, but it appears not all of those recommendations were taken.This is a copy of the PSP-CIA recommendations. It not exclusively looking at walkaway, but a lot of it points to that.
Many, if not most, of them were not taken.Thanks for these JJ. They seemed to be trying to cover all the bases, but it appears not all of those recommendations were taken.
The most likely option is walkaway. That is not proof.J.J. do you think you know what happened to Ray? I mean at this point... I know you have many ideas you have gone with. my issue is I can't see a clue and just drop the subject or call it irrelevant when it has not been explained. Some things cannot be used as evidence because they don't reach the bar and are thus rendered inadmissible.. but I can't let go of a few things in this story. Things that I feel are knowable or provable or are mistakes..it feels intentionally stalled . giving me a coverup vibe, because they just dropped Ray...they dropped the subject...they packed up their stuff and went home.
mOO
The most likely option is walkaway. That is not proof.
I think that local LE thought that a voluntary departure would damage RFG's legacy and did not pursue investigative avenues; I also think that they were not willing to investigate something that did not appear to be criminal due to cost.
There have been some people who basically thing RFG would be a terrible person if he walked away. If he did:
1. He did not make it look like anything that it wasn't.
2. Did not commit any crime.
3. Provided for his heirs.
If that is what RFG did, I find no fault in it.
There was an audit of the office when he went missing; everything was in order.I don't see any evidence of RFG doing anything wrong. The only suspicious thing I've read about was the suspicion that, in working with Louis Freeh on his report of the Sandusky crimes, someone may have given Freeh incriminating information against influential people who had knowledge of the early reports on Sandusky's assaults on kids. Just some speculation. Otherwise, there's no evidence of Gricar being involved in any kind of illegal or scandalous activity.
I assume the Centre County prosecutors office conducts regular audits of their finances. If Gricar was involved in anything illegal, it would have turned up in an audit.
That report was made in 4/21/05. IMO from the context of the write up it was the very first findings of their preliminary investigation a few days after Ray disappeared, and they hadn’t been able to follow up on it much yet as of then. It’s very possible, almost likely, that LE identified the savings account and VG account sometime after 4/21/05.Since this has come up, here is the financial information. It has been out there for a while.
Using the IVES database, which the state has access to, they could find the account is 48 hours.That report was made in 4/21/05. IMO from the context of the write up it was the very first findings of their preliminary investigation a few days after Ray disappeared, and they hadn’t been able to follow up on it much yet as of then. It’s very possible, almost likely, that LE identified the savings account and VG account sometime after 4/21/05.