Person of Interest Identified in Dylan Redwine case * MARK REDWINE ARRESTED**

Status
Not open for further replies.
I believe the profiler predicted it could be another few(?) months, but he thought there would be new information release in a couple weeks. Of course we all wonder what.:tantrum:

Anyway 3 cheers for the profiler, the last search & to LE for all there efforts in moving full-steam ahead for Dylan:loveyou:.
 
LE waited 10 days before executing a search warrant at Mark's home.

I've never understood why they delayed for so long.



http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20121129/NEWS01/121129570

It was not really an in-depth search. They walked through briefly and did a cursory search to look for an obvious crime scene or to see if there was a child hiding or a dead body. But they did not use luminol or cadaver dogs or take any swabs anywhere. Then they thought he had run off to hang with friends so it was quite awhile before they brought a forensics team in.

Thank you for refreshing my memory. Shame on LaPlata SO for not taking it more seriously ad thinkin he was a runaway. I wish more LEOs would take the gut feelings of a mom more seriously.
 
It was not really an in-depth search. They walked through briefly and did a cursory search to look for an obvious crime scene or to see if there was a child hiding or a dead body. But they did not use luminol or cadaver dogs or take any swabs anywhere. Then they thought he had run off to hang with friends so it was quite awhile before they brought a forensics team in.

They should have brought in an HRD dog immediately to check Mark's home. LE dropped the ball at the beginning of this case.

JMO
 
They should have brought in an HRD dog immediately to check Mark's home. LE dropped the ball at the beginning of this case.

JMO

I agree. And they should have taken pictures right then too. Because later on he talked about Dylan eating cereal that morning and watching certain DVDS. And I wish they had pictures to verify some of those anecdotes. I seriously doubt that Dylan had immediately washed out his cereal bowl and I wish there was a picture to show if there was one in the sink or not.
 
They should have brought in an HRD dog immediately to check Mark's home. LE dropped the ball at the beginning of this case.

JMO
Although you may wish it worked that way it doesn't legally. I wish it was law, but it isn't. Bottom line there was no legal probable cause to get a warrant it at that time (why would there be), so LE DID NOT DROP the ball in this case. JMO
 
They practically tore up his house looking for evidence. They wouldn't have had to find much to bring a case -- which makes me wonder whether there is anything to be found. It wouldn't be the first time LE has developed tunnel vision about a suspect.

Don't get me wrong. MW is as far as I can tell a sick man and utterly without redeeming social value. But I'm still neutral as to whether I think he's a murderer.

Ah! I just had a thought. Maybe they found something belong to the POI at the location up the mountain where they found the remains. I was thinking when they say they found more evidence recently that it was something more to do with remains but they didn't say anything about what was found. But if they found some personal things or even dna of the POI that may make things more interesting.
 
If someone shoves a kid a little too hard and he hits his head on a rock, is he a murderer? I think it is possible that a drunken man could harm his kid and cover it up and not feel that he is a murderer?

I thought about that same scenario so many times early on. But I do not think the same drunken person so out of control to do this would be so stealthly able to cover their tracks so well. It seems to me that most drunken ' accidental ' murders end up with very wide open and unconcealed evidence.
 
http://www.krdo.com/news/person-of-interest-identified-in-redwine-investigation/34007332 ( bizarre but there are no upper case letters in this article. rush to print? )

'' klismet says investigators will be able to release the person of interest's name in a few weeks. we've called mark redwine several times today to get his side of the story -- and have not heard back. '''

''do that anytime, anyplace. klismet says his door is open and he is willing to talk to mark redwine. if mr. redwine thinks that he's the person of interest in that, then i think it's his job to get a hold of us and to talk with us to convince us that he is not a person of interest in this case.. ''

Wow,,,,, so is it safe to say MR is at least " A" POI ??
 
Precious boy. I'm so overwhelmed with emotion the last couple of days about this. I did not know there would ever be any more movement in Dylan's case. I'm hopeful! What did NG say about him? Dripping in sunshine?

abc_dylan_redwine_dm_121126_wg.jpg
 
I feel like I need to go back and re read somw suff. I think I just stumbled upon a wholoe lot of crazy on Facebook.
 
Maybe the crazy I came across is not supposed to be crazy? The invesigator posted on it. I clickedd on his facebook and he seems to be an author as well. Seems kind of weird and not professionally an investigative tool to use for a conviction? IDK. I though investigators were more professional and/or hush hush about things. Posting on that facebook page seems strange. But i guess if it gets things going then ok.
 
As we assumed the POI Is Mark IMO

He is so guilty and I love the fact that his lies are now being called out . So he didn't talk to LE at the weekend like he claimed and this is just one more lie to add to the rest of them .

If he was innocent then he would be bending over backwards to clear his name and talk to LE to try and find justice for his son . Yet he does none of this which points to his involvement . IMO
 
Also, certain things didnt happen that a concerned parent might do. Mark returns home, to find his son gone. And he takes a nap? He does not immediately react and go call his friends or go looking?

[BBM] Very good points.
[My Opinion Only] He'd been a busy man all night long, secreting his son's remains and destroying evidence. He continued to work feverishly all night until the sun came up. But it wasn't time to rest then. He continued covering his tracks that morning, and establishing an alibi. Setting the scene with cereal bowl, spoon, juice glass in sink. Cereal box left out on the kitchen counter. TV tuned to "Nickelodeon" (if it is even still an option on cable TV?). DVD player with movie still in the machine (BTW: wonder if Dylan's prints were on the DVD disc itself?). Reconnaissance mission through house to ensure that all of Dylan's trappings that he would have taken with him were destroyed.

He is so shrewd and cunning. LE and their tactics are no match for him, he tells himself, as he goes about his mission leaving no stone unturned where evidence could be found later.


No way did he have enough legitimate business and errands to get done the following morning to keep him away from that house for 4 hours (and I'm allowing for travel time here). He would have dropped Dylan off at a friend's first, and then gone about his errands. He wouldn't have wasted the gas making 2 trips. Leaving the house and Dylan behind, only to return later to make the same trek? Come on! Further, I am certain that Dylan would have been up at O'Dawn Thirty that morning, so excited would he have been to see his little buddies. He was making extra errands for himself, to ensure that he'd be gone a credible amount of time to allow for other theories to explain Dylan's disappearance. It would not do to be gone too brief a time. That would lay bare the question of why MR didn't encounter Dylan walking down the road if he left on foot. The longer MR stayed away from the house, the more possibilities and theories could be entertained that didn't solely implicate MR in Dylan's disappearance. And so, exhausted, he took a nap. There was plenty of time to "discover" Dylan had gone missing -- later. [All my opinion only]
 
Although you may wish it worked that way it doesn't legally. I wish it was law, but it isn't. Bottom line there was no legal probable cause to get a warrant it at that time (why would there be), so LE DID NOT DROP the ball in this case. JMO

“We are not calling Mark Redwine a suspect,” Sheriff’s spokesman Dan Bender said. “It was only prudent to search, because this was the last place Dylan was seen.”

Dan Bender said they conducted the search of Mark's home because it was the last place Dylan was seen. I assume that would be enough probable cause to get the search warrant.

Waiting 10 days was not right IMO.

http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20121129/NEWS01/121129570
 
As we assumed the POI Is Mark IMO

He is so guilty and I love the fact that his lies are now being called out . So he didn't talk to LE at the weekend like he claimed and this is just one more lie to add to the rest of them .

If he was innocent then he would be bending over backwards to clear his name and talk to LE to try and find justice for his son . Yet he does none of this which points to his involvement . IMO

Were are you getting this information? Link please.
 
As we assumed the POI Is Mark IMO

He is so guilty and I love the fact that his lies are now being called out . So he didn't talk to LE at the weekend like he claimed and this is just one more lie to add to the rest of them .

If he was innocent then he would be bending over backwards to clear his name and talk to LE to try and find justice for his son . Yet he does none of this which points to his involvement . IMO

BBM By that same token , if he was guilty, he would not be chatting non stop to reporters all the time. So he has to be guilty or innocent but he's not behaving like EITHER should. I don't know the answer.
 
Klismet said Saturday that Redwine is not being completely forthcoming about his characterization.

"I'd be more than happy to speak with Mr. Redwine whenever and wherever. But he wants to do it on his terms. He wants to speak on the phone. If he wants to talk, we're going to sit down face to face or we're not going to do it," Klismet said.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...erson-of-interest-in-son-dylan-redwines-death

So Mark states to the media that Pete won't talk with him. Half truth, as the reality is investigators said it has to be in person - not over the phone. Just like when Mark blamed Jack T for not doing the poly:
JT:
So what was it that affected you to the point where we couldn’t go forward?

MR:
Well…and I guess when you were asking me these questions and you asked that question and I responded to it and I gave you my answer, I guess I was… I was expecting another question to follow that one, and… and…and at that point when it stopped

JT:
Well, actually, it wasn’t a question though, Mark. It was a statement by me and I said, well that’s a disqualifier. If you don’t feel well enough to take this test, then we’re not gonna’ do it.

47:08
MR:
Right…but the question was, do I feel well enough to take it? My response was, No, and…. and… instead of having another question followed behind that, when you reacted to that, and … and… said what you said, I was a bit taken by that.

Dr. Phil:
Do you wanna’ take it?

MR:
Well I don’t know that… that…. That… At the point we are right now with that question I don’t think that my answer is any different now that it was two hours ago.

Dr. Phil:
So you don’t want to take it.

MR:
Pause…Not if… if it means that my answer to that question is, no, then it’s no now. You know, maybe now isn’t the time to be taking the polygraph test, and I believe that that’s where we’re at with that.
.
 
Were are you getting this information? Link please.



This info was on this page

http://www.krdo.com/news/person-of-interest-identified-in-redwine-investigation/34007332

'' klismet says investigators will be able to release the person of interest's name in a few weeks. we've called mark redwine several times today to get his side of the story -- and have not heard back. '''

Mark on saturday
"I've been in communication with the La Plata County Sheriff's Department, and they have no interest in communicating with me right now," Mark Redwine, the father of deceased 13-year-old Dylan Redwine, said Saturday morning. "

So if Mark had indeed been in contact like he 'claims' on Saturday why when LE called him on Sunday did he not respond ?
http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_28433550/mark-redwine-says-he-may-be-person-interest
 
"I'd be more than happy to speak with Mr. Redwine whenever and wherever. But he wants to do it on his terms. He wants to speak on the phone. If he wants to talk, we're going to sit down face to face or we're not going to do it," Klismet said.

How does Klismet know that Mark wants to speak by phone if he or someone in LE never got a hold of him? Maybe Mark sent an E-mail or text stating this.

Kind of confusing IMO.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/new...erson-of-interest-in-son-dylan-redwines-death
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
538
Total visitors
631

Forum statistics

Threads
625,960
Messages
18,516,454
Members
240,906
Latest member
m23G
Back
Top