imthemom
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2007
- Messages
- 1,050
- Reaction score
- 17
If his insurance covered it, that would be an admission of liability, which proves my point. A deer, by comparison, cannot and is not expected to be controlled by a human. A dog, on the other hand, is expected to be controled by a human. If that human fails to control the dog, they are responsible for any damages that dog creates.
Your last sentence isn't clear to me, so if you'd like to rephrase it, I'll be happy to try and answer; however, since its comparing apples and oranges, you may wish to just let it slide.
I mean the drivers insurance would cover it. Sure the legality of it is that the owner of the dog would pay for the damage but to me this is not morally right unless this had been a dog running around the neighborhood causing trouble all the time.