- Joined
- Aug 29, 2009
- Messages
- 31,285
- Reaction score
- 87,512
Wow
What an unexpected photo.
They both look defeated.
JMO
it's fake
AI
Wow
What an unexpected photo.
They both look defeated.
JMO
Are we sure that's BK & AT and not actors? Neither of them look like BK & AT. Close, but enough to make me scratch my head and go "Is it..?
That is not an actual, unaltered pic, imo. I do not recall BK ever being in the courtroom, other than maybe his very early appearances, in prison orange. And BK does not show expressions, although if he tried, they probably would look as fake as this photo.It's certainly an AI generated picture. Neither really look like the real people they are attempting to portray.
Good point. I had forgotten all about good ol' AI. Likely because I despise it so much. But I'm going with AI or actors for some movie, but NOT actually BK & AT. I even went off pulling up pics of AT to compare facial features, down to her nostrils, believe it or not. Plus, I don't think she could grow a full head of hair. I'm not dissing her, I'm noting that her hair is rather thin with scraggly ends, and the woman in that pic's hair isn't the same IMO.It's certainly an AI generated picture. Neither really look like the real people they are attempting to portray.
I think it's totally AI generated, and photos that are AI should be labeled as such.Good point. I had forgotten all about good ol' AI. Likely because I despise it so much. But I'm going with AI or actors for some movie, but NOT actually BK & AT. I even went off pulling up pics of AT to compare facial features, down to her nostrils, believe it or not. Plus, I don't think she could grow a full head of hair. I'm not dissing her, I'm noting that her hair is rather thin with scraggly ends, and the woman in that pic's hair isn't the same IMO.
Lastly, it could be the lighting but the pic we're talking about looks blonder, with a straight part, not scraggly, and with lighter roots. I say that pic isn't them.
View attachment 602901View attachment 602902View attachment 602903
Sources of above pics below:
GH Video HERE.
AGREED!! With a big, fat AI watermark across the pic. In your face AI admission.I think it's totally AI generated, and photos are AI should be labeled as such.
jmopinion
I think it's totally AI generated, and photos that are AI should be labeled as such.
jmopinion
Don’t you think this might be Photoshopped? OMO.Wow
What an unexpected photo.
They both look defeated.
JMO
I'm not sure that you can photoshop emotion on BKs face. Plus, normally photoshopping is to make people look better. They didn't do that for AT IMO.Don’t you think this might be Photoshopped? OMO.
You have to train your eye to spot AI quickly! BK does not have a very strong chin, and many of the photos make him look better. JMOO
RBBM both of you to say LOL! (yes I know that is petty of me)Lastly, it could be the lighting but the pic we're talking about looks blonder, with a straight part, not scraggly, and with lighter roots. I say that pic isn't them.
View attachment 602901View attachment 602902View attachment 602903
Sources of above pics below:
GH Video HERE.
What??!? I was being factual, not trying to be mean. lolRBBM both of you to say LOL! (yes I know that is petty of me)
For clicks/views... imoand I don't understand why GH would use AI images when their real images are available
You are correct, @Gemmie — I do a lot with Photoshop. I used the term in a generic sense, meaning something unoriginal about photo. Thanks for clarifyingI'm not sure that you can photoshop emotion on BKs face. Plus, normally photoshopping is to make people look better. They didn't do that for AT IMO.
I didn't read it as mean or snarky! It WAS factual and accurate. But also... lol.What??!? I was being factual, not trying to be mean. lol![]()
We have quite a bit more than the limited view of BK in court as influenced by his attorneys.When someone remains silent and unemotional (possibly exactly as instructed by their lawyers) then everything stated about them is a projection. We only know the facts of his crime and unless he speaks, we have no idea as to his internal landscape.
I was hoping all my laughing, etc., that it was clear that I was teasing you.I didn't read it as mean or snarky! It WAS factual and accurate. But also... lol.![]()
Snip.
That's what I think the victim statements should state. For as much pain as BK inflicted on the families, they get to move beyond the tragedy and live. He should remember, every day, that they are living in the world and he is not. He couldn't cut it in the world. He failed.
If that said with disdain and DISMISSAL, I think that's the only thing they could say that would bother him.
SG has said he wants to know the injuries in preparation for his statement. I don't judge his personal reasons for that, but BK might enjoy hearing about the pain. I think to inflict pain on BK, dismiss him. Ignore him. Put an end to his influence.
jmo
We have quite a bit more than the limited view of BK in court as influenced by his attorneys.
Information about him and how he acts has been shared publicly by former employers, former friends and colleagues, neighbors, owners of businesses and extracurricular activities he frequented, and students and professors or other teachers who interacted with him at WSU as well as other institutions he attended or worked at. We have also seen publicly available video of extended interaction between him and officers who stopped him for traffic violations. And some of his writings as shared on Tapatalk have also revealed how he writes and thinks and some of the things that concerned him - most definitely his internal landscape at the time he wrote them.
SBMHe did all of this in part to be somebody, to be famous because he was a loser. He didn’t get the attention that he craved. I still think that he could have been snubbed by one of the 3 girls and he acted out of revenge