- Joined
- Sep 11, 2024
- Messages
- 2,519
- Reaction score
- 30,344
Sounds like we have similar thoughts as to what may give us some pause with KR. I’m on the fence with her.Maybe I’m just mean, but I fail to appreciate whatever expertise she allegedly has.
If she’s an expert on noticing the signs of a predator but she didn’t recognize it in BK, then of what value is she beyond the classroom lecture hall?
We ALL could recognize his pathology post-murder. She would have been of enormous value if she’d figured him out PRIOR to the murders.
She thought she was focusing on a diamond, but he was just cubic zirconia. She apparently couldn’t distinguish between the two any more than we could.
IMO of course, but I think her expertise is in authoring books and making money and some fame out of these gruesome tragedies.
Having taught BK is a bonanza for her, I fear.
JMO
The obvious issue is this instructor had a murderer in front of her & failed to recognize/identify him. Was she that bad or he that good or was he not fully sprouted yet at that time? Is she still the right person to be instructing the future in criminal justice? Maybe her methods need tweaking. I’m not in a position to offer a definitive take on that.
What she has to gain from the convict & how it is ultimately utilized is what concerns me. I’m not so sure it’s 100% for the benefit of others in her field of expertise. Obviously, I don’t know her personally so it’s impossible for me to know if it’s a cash grab or falls more into the realms of completely geeking out of pure interest/compulsion/obsession.
I can say for sure she didn’t have a diamond nor even a cubic zirconia. She simply had a turd & tried to polish it.
MOO