Jayelles
New Member
LovelyPigeon said:The items in the house were available to the intruder and he used them. The cord has never been sourced and none like it was found after days of searching the Ramsey's house, cars and property. The duct tape has never been sourced and none like it was ever found in or on anything the Ramseys owned.
Do you take the fact that the tape/cord weren't found on the premises as proof that they were never there?
The pubic hair on the blanket does not match a Ramsey.
This is unclear - newspaper reports suggesting that the hair belonged to Patsy Ramsey have never been officially refuted.
The palmprint on the door has not been matched.
Not according to unrefuted newspaper reports which claimed they were sourced to Melinda Ramsey. Lin Wood did not dispute that.
The partial palmprint on the ransom note has not been matched.
Please state your source for this unmatched partial on the ransom note.
The handwriting on the note has not been matched.
Handwriting analysis is not an exact science. You are very quick to dismiss those experts who claim the note is a match to Patsy.
The male DNA under JonBenét's fingernails and mixed with her blood in her panties has not been matched.
LP - how can you tell that the DNA was 'mixed' with the blood? If you spill salt water on a carpet and then spill fruit juice on top of it, how can you tell if two liquids or one (i.e. salty fruit juice) were spilled? Is there a way of telling?