why_nutt
New Member
LovelyPigeon said:On the contrary, Carnes opinion was based on the evidence presented by Lin Wood and as revealed in depositions, as opposed to the baseless claims of DH that Patsy wrote the note.
Keenan publically agreed with Carnes, and Keenan certainly has access to even more than Carnes or Wood.
There you go, then. Burke was asleep in the car, there was no half hour of playing with him on John's part when the family arrived home, both John and Patsy have lied, as proven by Keenan's exposure to the evidence and her unequivocal agreement with every word Carnes wrote. In my opinion, we may be able to take this as evidence that Burke spilled those beans in his grand jury testimony. Having lied about Burke being asleep is not a criminal offense on its own, of course, but it would put a grand jury off of wanting to interview John and Patsy themselves, since they would not be certain of obtaining truthful testimony, and Keenan is of a forgiving-enough nature to let them have a pass (though that then would make me wonder whether she had some doubts and needed personal contact with the Ramseys, to let their charisma firm up her determination to see them as innocent, thus leading to that famous four-hour meeting sans Lin Wood).
You cannot have it both ways, though. If the DNA evidence presented by Lin Wood was valid and scientific enough to sway Carnes in her opinions, he had no need for these lab reports he has always screamed about wanting. And if he continues to want those lab reports, then the evidence he presented to Carnes was contaminated by being unscientific on scientific matters.