- Joined
- Dec 29, 2009
- Messages
- 5,567
- Reaction score
- 29,653
Yep, huge problem. Probably the most important talking point.
Much bigger problem than the courts being clogged with false allegations.

Yep, huge problem. Probably the most important talking point.
An examination of how the team has dealt with scandals over the past two decades and into this fall reveals an organized and expensive effort that involved quashing accusations as they emerged while raising questions about the accusers character and motives, both publicly and surreptitiously. And the team has never been shy about blasting the news media for engaging in a feeding frenzy even as the team made deals or slipped the news organizations information that would cast Mr. Cosbys accusers in a negative light.
Playing hardball with people who make (and report on) incendiary claims is hardly a new tactic in the celebrity world. But given the volume and severity of the recent charges, with numerous women saying Mr. Cosby drugged and then sexually assaulted them, some legal and public relations practitioners question the wisdom of continuing to counterpunch.
...
I would suggest, Mr. Brafman added, a softly spoken denial rather than an outspoken challenge to the integrity of the women now coming forward. Simply put, it may be better to say nothing than try and engage so many.
Cosby's Private Investigators Dig Up Dirt to Discredit Rape Accusers
Bill Cosby has hired a battalion of private investigators to dig up dirt on his many accusers, The Post has learned.
The comedian, fighting an onslaught of accusations that he sexually assaulted more than two dozen women over many years, is paying six-figure fees to private investigators for information that might discredit his alleged victims.
Multiple sources confirmed that Cosby, through his Hollywood attorney Martin Singer, is implementing a scorched-earth strategy in which anything negative in his accusers pasts is fair game.
At least one Glendale, Calif.-based firm with a half-dozen former LAPD detectives on staff is muckraking for Cosby, a source said.
http://pagesix.com/2014/12/28/cosby...ccusers/?_ga=1.57953258.1126446268.1335160290
She says she confronted Cosby and that he shoved her into a taxi. NPR's Eric Deggans tells our Newscast unit that "her story is similar to accusations made by more than 20 other women, some of whom claim Cosby also raped them."
On NBC today, Johnson said: "This is bigger than Bill Cosby. This is about women and violence against women. This is about women finding their voice. I feel that Cosby took my power that evening and that I took my power back."
http://www.npr.org/blogs/thetwo-way...bys-latest-accuser-supermodel-beverly-johnson
If Cosby is being maligned, libeled and slandered by any or all of these women, he's surely free to sue any or all of them, one at a time.
Like those posters who refuse to believe the women who failed to file complaints in a timely manner, I refuse to believe that an innocent and vastly wealthy man would not take these women to court, one at a time, and ASAP.
Respectfully snipped for focus.I would use the term domestic violence if Cosby assaulted his wife and children but I'd prefer some other term for the alleged victims who were not in an intimate relationship or family relationship with him.
http://www.domesticabuseshelter.org/infosexualviolence.htmOne out of three women and one out of six men will be raped in their lifetimes.
http://rapethetruevictim2010.weebly.com/types-of-rape.htmlStatistics have shown that 50% to 88% of rape victims know their perpetrators.
RTBM: jumping off your post-
Beverley Johnson has said she is supporting Janice who I actually find more credible because she wanted to tell her story in 2006 +/- and because I believe her in her frustration and anger expressed about it in the Howard Stern interview in 2006 – gut reaction. On The View, when Beverley said she didn’t know if she was raped yet remembers in great detail the exchange with BC, and being shoved into a taxi - I felt doubt about her and the drugging piece – gut reaction.
http://abc.go.com/shows/the-view/video/pl5554876/vdka0_r1b7y9ub
Where things start to get really muddled for me is with Kathie Lee Gifford saying ‘Bill Cosby tried to kiss me’. I almost think she is team Cosby trying to water down the press with the absurdity at some other diminished end of the spectrum. Otherwise, she has very kind things to say about Cosby.
http://www.etonline.com/news/155251_kathie_lee_gifford_says_bill_cosby_tried_to_kiss_her/
http://www.people.com/article/kathie-lee-gifford-bill-cosby-sexual-abuse-allegations
LAPD won’t pursue criminal charges regarding Huth at PB Mansion in ‘74. I wonder if they are going to file a civil suit for 100 mil?
http://mashable.com/2014/12/16/los-angeles-cosby-no-charges/
If that doesn’t happen where does this thing go? -To the tabloid press? -More Dr. Phil? Maybe that is ok for some but I question, is that a good platform for the conversation? There are harrowing issues for women all over the world.
Imo- what is starting to happen is not advancing the “bigger than BC issue”, but perhaps is setting it back especially if any, or many of the women are discredited. For that I feel very sorry for the women who are truthful in this BC saga - and for other victims in other cases who are way out of the limelight.
The court of public opinion can be a fickle thing – the more watered down and unsubstantiated the claims become, it gets reduced to gossip – far, far away from advancing issues with power & integrity. –imo we are not having an Anita Hill moment of real change and awareness.
And that is how it is done....:sick:
I know two women who were raped. I know two men and one woman who confided in me that they were sexually abused as children. That seems like quite a lot to me. Way too many for one person to know. I also once held a job that required my accessing medical records involving minors who were victims of sex crimes. The sheer volume of cases shocked me. Also shocking was the fact that the vast majority involved little kids rather than older ones, for example a statutory rape of a teenage girl who thought she was simply going on a "date" with that older cute guy she'd met at the park. My point being that these kinds of crimes are, according to my personal experience, much more prevalent than the average person might believe. Disgustingly and depressingly so. The human species can really be repulsive at times.
**Understand that you were raped, DREAD—date-ish raped, acquaintance-ish raped, gray-area-ish raped, blurry-booze-soaked-lines raped, and raped under circumstances that would make bringing charges a futile exercise. But raped. Your ex kept coming at you, and you were paralyzed by a set of inhibitions—a desire to avoid confrontation at all costs (even the cost of your own violation), a desire to avoid making your victimizer feel bad—that are pounded into the heads of girls and young women. Your ex exploited this vulnerability. Your ex may not think he raped you since you finally "let him," and perhaps he interprets that as consent and so, distressingly, does your boyfriend. But raped you were.
My Bolds
By the Numbers:
44% of victims are under age 18
80% are under age 30
68% of sexual assaults are not reported to LE
98% of rapists will never spend a day in jail
Statics from Rape, Abuse & Incest National Network (https://www.rainn.org/statistics)
I think these stats support your personal experience.
The under-reporting of rape back in the day may have something to do with the image we have of a "typical" rape and the lack of language that would address what a person experienced. How do you report something if you haven't got a word to use?
The book I Never Called It Rape: The Ms. Report on Recognizing, Fighting and Surviving Date and Acquaintance Rape * by Robin Warshaw was first published in 1988. It was based on the Ms. Magazine Campus Project on Sexual Assault and derives its title from a statistic gleaned by the study: 27% of women whose sexual assault met the criteria of rape DID NOT identify their experience as rape.
Dan Savage in his Jan. 8, 2009 column, Savage Love, in The Stranger responded to a writer who had to ask if the assault perpetrated on her by her ex-boyfriend was, in fact, rape. IMO, Savage's response could not have been more clear, but the writer's dilemma and the response of her current partner give, I think, a good description of what many people face if they reveal the circumstances of a sexual assault.
**
It's very sad.
*Warshaw, R. (1994). I Never Called It Rape (Harper Perennial ed.). New York: HarperPerennial. p. 11. ISBN 978-0-06-092572-7.
** To read the letter and the complete response: http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/SavageLove?oid=936054
I thought I posted this already, but I must not have hit post before I fell asleep last night.
Is the Dan Savage you quoted Typhoid Dan who went around licking doorknobs and computer keyboards to try to get people sick?
Dan's own words:
“I go around the room licking doorknobs. They are filthy, no doubt, but there isn’t time to find a rag to spit on. If for some reason I don’t manage to get a pen from my mouth to Gary’s hands at the conference, I want to seed his office with germs, get as many of his people sick as I can, and hopefully one of them will infect the candidate. I lick office doorknobs, bathroom doorknobs. When that’s done, I start on the staplers, phones, and computer keyboards. Then I stand in the kitchen and lick the rims of all the clean coffee cups drying in the rack. I grab my coat and head out.”
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/germ-warfare/Content?oid=3092
He is evil incarnate IMO--not anyone I would quote as an authority on anything except how to be a horrible human being.
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/29/a...ccusers-insult-them-blame-the-media.html?_r=0An examination of how the team has dealt with scandals over the past two decades and into this fall reveals an organized and expensive effort that involved quashing accusations as they emerged while raising questions about the accusers’ character and motives, both publicly and surreptitiously. And the team has never been shy about blasting the news media for engaging in a feeding frenzy even as the team made deals or slipped the news organizations information that would cast Mr. Cosby’s accusers in a negative light.
Playing hardball with people who make (and report on) incendiary claims is hardly a new tactic in the celebrity world. But given the volume and severity of the recent charges, with numerous women saying Mr. Cosby drugged and then sexually assaulted them, some legal and public relations practitioners question the wisdom of continuing to counterpunch.
“Sometimes in a case like this, less can be more,” said Benjamin Brafman, a criminal defense lawyer who represented Dominique Strauss-Kahn. “Attacking someone who is perceived to be a ‘victim’ can often be unproductive.”
I thought I posted this already, but I must not have hit post before I fell asleep last night. Is the Dan Savage you quoted Typhoid Dan who went around licking doorknobs and computer keyboards to try to get people sick?
Dan's own words:“I go around the room licking doorknobs. They are filthy, no doubt, but there isn’t time to find a rag to spit on. If for some reason I don’t manage to get a pen from my mouth to Gary’s hands at the conference, I want to seed his office with germs, get as many of his people sick as I can, and hopefully one of them will infect the candidate. I lick office doorknobs, bathroom doorknobs. When that’s done, I start on the staplers, phones, and computer keyboards. Then I stand in the kitchen and lick the rims of all the clean coffee cups drying in the rack. I grab my coat and head out.”http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/germ-warfare/Content?oid=3092
He is evil incarnate IMO--not anyone I would quote as an authority on anything except how to be a horrible human being.
"Cosby did settle a lawsuit in 2006 filed by one of his accusers out of court. The terms of the settlement remain confidential."