Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - 1/9-1/12 Break

[MeeBee]

I'll just patiently wait for the transcripts, that I anticipate to be a big NOTHING.....

It is what it is...

I watch this case unfold from afar... I love you all... but hate that many get too emotionally involved.

I hate to sound crass... but just as the Alexander family will need to move on when this is over.... so will everyone here.

I'm prepared. I left this site for a long time after the Anthony verdict. I needed time away, I just hope everyone here can deal with a verdict... no matter what it is..

:loveyou: I do love everyone here, but worry that some take these cases too far.

I'll always be here to vent.... So... anyway... carry on...

I'm sure we'll survive.

 

[LinasK]

I'll just patiently wait for the transcripts, that I anticipate to be a big NOTHING.....

It is what it is...

I watch this case unfold from afar... I love you all... but hate that many get too emotionally involved.

I hate to sound crass... but just as the Alexander family will need to move on when this is over.... so will everyone here.

I'm prepared. I left this site for a long time after the Anthony verdict. I needed time away, I just hope everyone here can deal with a verdict... no matter what it is..

:loveyou: I do love everyone here, but worry that some take these cases too far.

I'll always be here to vent.... So... anyway... carry on...

Yeah, what's happening in Paris makes alot of other things seem petty in comparison.

 

[elementary]

Some physiological drives are stronger than others.

Just ask Brewer, Searcy, Samuels, and Zervakos.

Truth Detector, I want to take you home and have you do stand up for me for the rest of our lives. LOL.

 

[Kamille]

I agree. But maybe KN's saying if there is child on the PC then it wouldnt be that farfetched that TA would have pictures as well. I think in his mind child on the PC indirectly supports JA's testimony.

Except no one is saying there is child on the PC. Now it's just adult and apparently only one site which may have been inadvertently clicked on. Which goes to what in her original testimony exactly? Absolutely nothing. Except maybe a vague reference to seeing pictures on there of a woman nude from the waist up? Which was not found on the computer. So again. Nothing.

Oh and of course because the prosecution did not make a nice extra copy of the HD in 2008 to hand over to the DT and apparently the DT didn't get around to bothering to make a copy of their own until 2009, even though they knew of the existence of the 2008 copy, this is gross misconduct and/or a Brady violation so therefore JA should be set free or be allowed to spend the rest of her natural life in prison organizing book clubs, selling her art, running her online business, getting a degree, corresponding with her fan club etc, whichever suits the judge because KN can't seem to decide what it is he's expecting from this motion. As long as she's not subjected to living on death row until her eventual release from prison or the eventual overturning of her DP sentence. Because this mentally ill special snowflake will NEVER be executed for slaughtering a man in cold blood. Mark Nurmi's words.

MOO

 

[elementary]

CBS 5 News @CBS5AZ 5h5 hours ago Phoenix, AZ
Arias attorney: 14 witnesses have been afraid to come forward and testify on Arias' behalf.#jodiarias @jbarrycbs5
View attachment 67125
http://pixgood.com/scared-egg-faces.html

Juan is calling his bluff (let's go to the videotape,lol). If JSS comments/questions today is any indication of how she is going to rule on Monday, whatevever DT is selling, she's not buying.

Hope the judge can clear these pending motions off her calendar on Monday and put this trial back on track real soon.

Yes, Juan did call his bluff. Who was expecting that? I wasn't and yet he was sooooo accommodating!

And, BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!! on the photo.

 

[atthelake]

I do have to give JSS credit for doing her homework as she claimed she reviewed past previous testimony and she pretty much knew this would be more of the same.

I wish she would make more rulings on the fly instead of always taking things in advisement but so long as she doesnt end up agreeing with Nurmi's BS then all is ok.

HHJP was so impressive during the FCA case as he ruled at the moment . He was an impressive jurist in that regard. :moo:

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

 

[elementary]

I do have to give JSS credit for doing her homework as she claimed she reviewed past previous testimony and she pretty much knew this would be more of the same.

I wish she would make more rulings on the fly instead of always taking things in advisement but so long as she doesnt end up agreeing with Nurmi's BS then all is ok.

But isn't that a judge's job? I wonder about all the questioning and give and take we missed thanks to the secret everything. Maybe we would have had a completely different picture of the process.

 

[tandt]

Forgive me-- I've read the past few pages but can't really tell what happened today. Was it same ol, same ol from the DT? Anything new?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Caylee Advocate]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uaLC7razrZY

 

[ElleElle]

Jodi Arias sentencing trial: Could it all be over Monday?

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2015/01/09/jodi-arias-death-penalty-ruling/21526215/

I believe it could be. DP taken out, transcripts released... I am just being realistic.

 

[LinasK]

HHJP was so impressive during the FCA case as he ruled at the moment . He was an impressive jurist in that regard. :moo:

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

And yet he allowed a juror who refused to judge because of the fear the defense team would cry racism...

 

[Caylee Advocate]

I should have known that MK was the reporter, he is such as -clown. I clicked off of the article as soon as I saw his name, this chick "ain't got no time for dat". Thanks for posting it though.

 

[Mystymiss]

Last note by BK...Nurmi says he may have to take it (upcoming JSS ruling) to a higher court, and that the decision whether she should testify again won't be made until court(s) resolve.

Hello! Nurm get with the program! Two Courts already have! :happydance:

 

[LinasK]

Jodi Arias sentencing trial: Could it all be over Monday?

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2015/01/09/jodi-arias-death-penalty-ruling/21526215/

I believe it could be. DP taken out, transcripts released... I am just being realistic.

No Way, JSS isn't gonna accomodate him and take the DP off the table.

 

[Ransom]

Who is this "out of country" person they speak of that can't testify for the DT? Oh right, it's a secret. :shush:

Mark McGee

 

[Ransom]

So it seems Dworkin and Melendez both lied under oath about the during the first trial.

Looks like we've come to an impasse. Really, really curious on how JSS will rule and if Nurmi will take it a higher court.

Neither lied under oath. JMO

 

[Ransom]

Jodi Arias sentencing trial: Could it all be over Monday?

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/local/mesa/2015/01/09/jodi-arias-death-penalty-ruling/21526215/

I believe it could be. DP taken out, transcripts released... I am just being realistic.

lol......

 

[Ransom]

HHJP was so impressive during the FCA case as he ruled at the moment . He was an impressive jurist in that regard. :moo:

Sent from my SCH-S720C using Tapatalk 2

HHJP was NOT impressive to me. In fact, he sucked. JMO

 

[daisydomino]

Forgive me-- I've read the past few pages but can't really tell what happened today. Was it same ol, same ol from the DT? Anything new?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Spoiler

January 09, 2015

09:46AM	@courtpio	State v Jodi Arias: Camera is approved for motions hearing this afternoon.	Twitter
12:14PM	@12News	LIVE: #JodiArias trial updates http://t.co/F6StVzY2J3	Twitter
12:27PM	@william_pitts	Now hearing the video restrictions on today's hearing are relaxed. We can use the video after the hearing's over. #JodiArias	Twitter
12:49PM	@william_pitts	Nurmi citing the court's reasoning in closing the courtroom to the judge. Which was ruled unconnstitutional. Not sure how that works.	Twitter
12:50PM	@william_pitts	FINALLY. Martinez brings up subpoenas. Says there were no attempts to subpoena anyone. #JodiArias	Twitter
12:51PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Juan says he wants the affidavits of these witnesses because he doesn't have them. #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
12:55PM	@william_pitts	Whatever witness Nurmi says he has on , Martinez says TA wasn't even living in the house with that computer at the time. #JodiArias	Twitter
12:55PM	@michaelbkiefer	Martinez says it was more likely the person who alleged Alexander watched who really watched the . Calls it a ""communal computer.""	Twitter
12:55PM	@william_pitts	Seriously shocked no one mentioned subpoenas for the last three weeks of this thing. #JodiArias	Twitter
12:56PM	@william_pitts	Martinez: I hope #JodiArias isn't saying she lied during the trial and that's why she won't use tape of it now.	Twitter
12:56PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Juan- The Bishops computer having pop ups well it was a communal computer many used #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
12:57PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Juan- Jodi testified for 18 days...the story is out there in full voice! We have video if defense wants to use it. #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:07PM	@william_pitts	Nurmi again says Martinez admitted (today) to not disclosing the 2008 mirror image of the hard drive.	Twitter
01:07PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Nurmi- The changing of horses supports Ms. Arias's claims #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:08PM	@troyhaydenfox10	14 more witnesses for #JodiArias defense? We could be here til late spring.	Twitter
01:08PM	@william_pitts	Judge: Nurmi do you agree that the existence of the images were disclosed? #JodiArias	Twitter
01:08PM	@william_pitts	Nurmi: The hard drive yes, the images no. #JodiArias	Twitter
01:08PM	@SKrafftFox10	judge: do you agree hard drive was disclosed? ""existence yes, images no"" says #jodiarias atty.	Twitter
01:08PM	@michaelbkiefer	Nurmi: a piece of evidence that should have been turned over in 2009 not turned over until December 2014, after first trial and mid second.	Twitter
01:09PM	@michaelbkiefer	Numi says it would never occur to them that Mesa PD would turn on the computer without a writeblocker. #JodiArias	Twitter
01:10PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Melendez never informed defense there was a difference in the images #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:10PM	@william_pitts	#JodiArias watches defense attorney Kirk Nurmi give oral arguments on throwing out the death penalty Friday. #12News http://t.co/KLSPxATKoc	Twitter
01:10PM	@michaelbkiefer	Melendez never mentioned the different mirror images. ""An act of of concealment,"" Nurmi says.	Twitter
01:11PM	@michaelbkiefer	Eventually, the withheld evidence will derail the case, Nurmi says, hinting at appeal. ""She will never be executed.""	Twitter
01:12PM	@william_pitts	JSS: I reread testimony. In mitigation testimony seems to have shifted to , is that the concern? #JodiArias	Twitter
01:12PM	@michaelbkiefer	Stephens asks the significance of the newfound mirror image.	Twitter
01:13PM	@TrialDiariesJ	We were forced to take this witness out of order & he was scrambling to get this done Smith was just getting basic info for 2 hours	Twitter
01:14PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Judge says she listened to Lonnie's testimony and now defense has shifted to the being an issue #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:14PM	@william_pitts	Nurmi talking about conviction based on false testimony. That's not an argument for JSS, that's for the appeals court.	Twitter
01:14PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Judge- Juan asked Lonnie if he found and he said he did but wasn't asked to look further by defense. #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:15PM	@michaelbkiefer	The #JodiArias murder conviction was based on false testimony, Nurmi says. Mesa PD has now admitted that there was on the computer.	Twitter
01:17PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Judge- There was no follow up from defense on this issue on re direct #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:19PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Nurmi- We can't read affidavits to the jury. This is an issue of identity for them. To be exposed by audio and video is an issue. #jodiarias	Twitter
01:19PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Nurmi- The threats happened before and it's a problem still with cyber-bullying #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:19PM	@william_pitts	Nurmi: ""It is game over. She cannot present a case for life."" #JodiArias	Twitter
01:20PM	@michaelbkiefer	Nurmi: ""It is game over. She cannot present a good defense."" Stephens takes it under advisement.	Twitter
01:20PM	@william_pitts	#JodiArias has nto decided whether to take the stand. Nurmi wants a ruling on this before she decides. #JodiArias	Twitter
01:21PM	@william_pitts	Keeping track of these motions is hard...like calling the question of the motion on the previous question on the rule. #JodiArias #huh	Twitter
01:21PM	@michaelbkiefer	Stephens says she will have a decision ""No later than Monday."" Meanwhile, Nurmi will plan on witnesses for then.	Twitter
01:21PM	@SKrafftFox10	#jodiarias atty: please give us your decision before Jodi Arias might testify. Judgeecision no later than Monday morning.	Twitter
01:22PM	@TrialDiariesJ	Nurmi wants a decision before Jodi makes a decision on testifying. Judge said she will have it by Monday #jodiarias #3tvarias	Twitter
01:22PM	@william_pitts	court's adjourned. Back to work...more on @12news at 5	Twitter
01:23PM	@courtpio	State v #JodiArias: hearing has concluded. Judge Sherry Stephens will take motions under advisement. Trial resumes Monday at 9:30am.	Twitter

 

[Myvice]

I've been thinking back to the first hearing and how BN was so condescending to Juan.

He kept using the word slimy and he told Juan he knew nothing about computers. He also said the computer was loaded with and anyone that wasn't incompetent would have found it, unless they were trying to hide it.

The implication all the way through that hearing was that it was a bombshell and Juan and Florez had orchestrated some major cover-up.

Come to find out, Juan new more about computers than BN and the real orchestration was in trying to get people to believe that TA had actively sought out and watched it day and night (I believe those were Nurmi's words).

The single time the DT was able to put out that TA may have actually VIEWED anything was after JA had moved and certainly doesn't bolster their Jeckyl/Hyde scenario.

There is no way JSS will believe that one peak at would be exculpatory. And the handling of the computer seemed pretty standard for the times. Definitely not purposeful or malicious, IMO.

Nurmi threatens to take the decision to a higher court, after he's been turned down twice on this issue and thinks that is helpful? Just not seeing it.