Steft50
Having Fun
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2011
- Messages
- 827
- Reaction score
- 719
Can someone explain the alleged not turning over the image from the 18th.
Is Nurmi saying that the State had the original image of the hard drive and when DT asked to look at the computer evidence, that the DT only got the real computer that they turned on and copied their own image of it?
I got confused about some image from the 18th that seemed like Nurmi was claiming the state never gave him.
I doubt it has much difference other than the virus or cleaners being run
Any sabotage once DT took it would be on them.
This has me confused too. First Nurmi claimed prosecution misconduct by intentionally altering a computer. Now he's calling prosecution misconduct by saying an image or mirror of the computer was withheld from the defense back in the beginning of the case and that caused an unjust verdict based on lies and withheld evidence. Do I have that right?