- Joined
- Apr 7, 2011
- Messages
- 11,556
- Reaction score
- 20,092








So even if there is












And it's the "child"




That is the salient issue which keeps getting subverted into other things.
=/ Child
So even if there ison TA's computer and even if TA actually downloaded it himself, which has not been shown, let alone proven, it still isn't CHILD
unless or until someone sees it, verifies it and determines that yes, it does exist and yes, it is child
and yes, it was downloaded on Such&SuchADate when TA was alive and JA was not on his computer.
And it's the "child"issue the defense is pushing, which does not appear to exist at all, in any form, connected with TA.
That is the salient issue which keeps getting subverted into other things.
=/ Child
So even if there ison TA's computer and even if TA actually downloaded it himself, which has not been shown, let alone proven, it still isn't CHILD
unless or until someone sees it, verifies it and determines that yes, it does exist and yes, it is child
and yes, it was downloaded on Such&SuchADate when TA was alive and JA was not on his computer nor was anyone else (which they probably can't prove anyway). They have yet to tie TA to anything the defense alleges, but they're sure spending a lot of time trying to confuse the judge and everyone else.
And it's the "child"issue the defense is pushing, which does not appear to exist at all, in any form, connected with TA.
That is the salient issue which keeps getting subverted into other things.
Monica Lindstrom ‏@monicalindstrom 3m3 minutes ago
JM objects to any more witnesses bc he says he has no idea who these witnesses are #JodiArias
Monica Lindstrom ‏@monicalindstrom 3m3 minutes ago
JM objects to any more witnesses bc he says he has no idea who these witnesses are #JodiArias
What is this witness's name?
What is this witness's name?