Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 12

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
  • #662
  • #663
  • #664
  • #665
Good even better! He should call her the convicted murderer.

I wonder if he CAN do that?? AZlawyer?? As she IS a convicted murderer...

Thanks a bunch for all the Tweets here!!! :seeya:
 
  • #666
Do you know this judge? Is this her normal court room protocol? ty

I don't know her. Some judges basically don't interfere unless and until a lawyer objects--that might be her policy.
 
  • #667
en's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 59s 59 seconds ago
Fonseca tells Juan the court reporter would like her to finish her response and Juan tells her yes or no #jodiarias #3tvarias

why is JSS not scalding her for her shi*ty attitude

The COURT REPORTER wants her to finish her response???!!! :floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh::floorlaugh:
 
  • #668
I think she set herself up to be overwhelmed. If she had cracked down and restored order to the court, maybe she wouldn't be so mentally exhausted with the chaos she has enabled. Instead she's battened down the hatches along with the DT like a victim of Stockholm Syndrome.

My biggest problem with her has been ALL the sidebars. I really don't think they were necessary...I still can't get out of my mind, Wilmott storming the bench non-stop.
 
  • #669
Lol. Who was Jodi trying to kid with her earmuffs when the sextape wss being played? She should know it by heart by now.

I hope the young women on the jury were looking at her and thinking, "Oh puh-LEEZE." Jodi Arias: Born Again Prude. As if.
:dramaqueen:
 
  • #670
Lol, the word she used (rhymes with sizzle for those still confused :) ) isn't even the way you say it. It's like her saying "shank" or "sexuous." She's out of touch in so many ways. I actually laughed out loud when I read ****le.

What I'm wondering is if WAT will replace that word for sizzle...aka j****lebar :lol:
 
  • #671
I saw it last week w/ my Dad...whoa, what a film!

I told my husband that through our collective communications here, by and for Websleuths, that the NSA must think we are either a bunch of Grad students in criminology or a group of sophisticated serial killers trying to cover our tracks!
 
  • #672
I don't know her. Some judges basically don't interfere unless and until a lawyer objects--that might be her policy.

Yeah and she doesn't seem to
 
  • #673
I wonder if he CAN do that?? AZlawyer?? As she IS a convicted murderer...

Thanks a bunch for all the Tweets here!!! :seeya:

Technically she hasn't been convicted yet, although she has been found guilty. But no, he won't refer to her as "the murderer" because he, apparently along with no one else in the courtroom, is focused on getting through this trial rather than causing drama and infinite sidebars.
 
  • #674
demarte.jpg
just a little lunch break refreshment

(I have the day off today which I'm so happy for to be here hangin w/ you peeps in my jammies :D )
 
  • #675
But the opposite argument can also be made. As Lambchop pointed out earlier, the Dr's disrespect and combativeness are only digging the DT's grave. Maybe JSS's inaction actually benefits JM.

Say what you will about this judge, I doubt she lets her likes and dislikes influence her.

And didn't JM ask the judge to admonish a witness in the main trial? He appears to be doing fine. The expert is showing her true colors which is not good for defense. The expert wants to this a trial about Travis which will not go unnoticed by this jury. JM can handle himself. That is why we all like him. lol :loveyou: jmo
 
  • #676
  • #677
  • #678
Catching up at work. Juan is doing a very nice turnaround today.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
  • #679
To bad she didn't drown in it instead. I know, not nice, sorry Mods.

Can you just imagine how THAT murder trial would go?

Laughing for some levity.
 
  • #680
I told my husband that through our collective communications here, by and for Websleuths, that the NSA must think we are either a bunch of Grad students in criminology or a group of sophisticated serial killers trying to cover our tracks!

THAT is FUNNY!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
79
Guests online
2,750
Total visitors
2,829

Forum statistics

Threads
632,864
Messages
18,632,751
Members
243,317
Latest member
Sfebruary
Back
Top