I find it weird how psychiatrists determine someone's personality based on the person's they're assessing own responses. People LIE. Wouldn't it be more accurate to interview those who knew them? Family, friends, etc?
I find it weird how psychiatrist determine someone's personality based on the person's they're assessing own responses. People LIE. Wouldn't it be more accurate to interview those who knew them? Family, friends, etc?
No worries- Juan and Dr Demarte will straighten all of this out for the jury. Arias had a lot of time to think up her NEW answers.
Isn't the current witness analyzing the test she did with Dr. Demarte? I've been copying tweets but that remains unclear to me.
There goes done by DEC18th. Can we hope for valentines day?
The one thing this court never wastes time with is breaking for lunch.
So they screwed up their 2008 copy as well and want JM to provide them another one so they can copy it and return it to him? I don't think they've been able to provide one copy of either the 2008 or 2009 copies that has not been altered by them? Is that correct?
From what I have read the MMCI-2 has 567 true/false questions (have no idea on page count) and takes 30 to 90 minutes to complete.
http://psychcentral.com/lib/minnesota-multiphasic-personality-inventory-mmpi/0005959
What will happen today? :thinking: With this trial, one never knows. I do hope JSS gets on the bench and tells the defense that their motion has been denied.
Will they try and call a witness today? If I were on the jury I'd find it mighty suspicious that the defense has only presented 2 witnesses, with one incomplete.
I see a nose....his profile?
How do the tests compensate for people that lie when answering the questions? She is a known liar, the test is given, but how do the graders or whatever they are called, take that into consideration....or they don't and just think she is telling the truth and give their report. The test would be invalid if she lied?! Please explain. Thanks in advance
I find it weird how psychiatrists determine someone's personality based on the person's they're assessing own responses. People LIE. Wouldn't it be more accurate to interview those who knew them? Family, friends, etc?
Well, I think we've all learned something. "Jodi Arias was not an angry person, no more than average." I've got to rethink my whole life & I've only got a lunch hour to do it.
The fact is, who cares what he did or did not say, and why in the heck is she so easily led to that goose chase rather than simply demanding now that it be turned over now.
The anxiety/stress one feels after murdering someone in cold-blood is a mitigating factor? :thinking:
Hi Nali. The MMPI--2 is a very, very reliable and valid instrument for measuring psychopathy, and it is as psychometrically sound as they come. It has internal constructs designed to "catch" exaggeration, over reporting and under-reporting--basically it is designed to identify those who lie on the test. And while there is no instrument out there that is perfect, this is the absolute best their is to offer when a clinician suspects psychopathy.
However, you are absolutely correct, any Clinician worth his or her salt (and by ethical standards) MUST take into account collateral reporting of family, friends, co-workers, etc..., in order to diagnose an individual appropriately.
Duh. That's because she had already slaughtered the person who made her angry.