Nali87
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 3, 2011
- Messages
- 5,309
- Reaction score
- 819
You guys were right. What is she waiting for? She has heard all this before.
Why is she allowing the jury to hear it if she hasn't come to a decision?
You guys were right. What is she waiting for? She has heard all this before.
Source: Twitter
"Michael Kiefer ‏@michaelbkiefer 1m1 minute ago
Judge just said there will be no ruling on the motion to dismiss until Flores finishes his testimony. #jodiarias."
Bk said in her notes JSS would rule on all today.
Lambchop had better have some warning notes about not trashing the judge lined, because I think a bunch of them are getting ready to fly!!
I really think she's allowing the DT to make their case to the jury about misconduct so she can rule against them but say she provided a remedy for this retrial.
I really think she's allowing the DT to make their case to the jury about misconduct so she can rule against them but say she provided a remedy for this retrial.
I'm beginning to think JA refused to let the DT call mitigating witnesses to support her PTSD/BPD/mental history despite Nurmi promising the jury he would do so. The DT has been in full attack-TA/attack-JM from the get-go, and has offered next to nothing to explain why JA butchered her "beloved" Travis that "she loved so much".
JW is just being an.
as per Beth
JW shows EF exhibit 233--one of JA's journals. The journals were found by Yreka PD, Mesa PD and Siskyou Sheriff's. The journals were photocopied and copies given to the state and the defense. JW: So, are you okay if I tear a piece of paper from this journal? EF: No, that would be destroying it. JW: What if I take the paper out and tape it back in? EF: I'm not okay with it but at least it can be tracked. If you take the paper, you would be destroying it. I would not let you tear the paper out.