Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 22

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,081
Oh, thanks for that clarification. That makes more sense then. Lots of nefarious porny things happen after 11 pm according to Dr. F.

Isn't that usually when nefarious porny things happen? ;)
 
  • #1,082
William Pitts ‏@william_pitts · 19s20 seconds ago
Flores says two items on the custody log are mislabled. Says out fo tofrensics, should say out for investigation. #JodiArias

I thought one was a purse in a plastic bag and I can't remember the second item, but I didn't think it was a computer.
 
  • #1,083
Anyone else think on breaks/lunch that JSS goes back to her office and lies down on the couch with a warm cloth over her forehead while sipping from a flask?
 
  • #1,084
How many weeks did we waste with this "possible child 🤬🤬🤬🤬" motion?


Weeks ? It's been Months ... Oh wait, it's been 2 Years !

:gaah::gaah::gaah:
 
  • #1,085
Yes. June 1 someone looked at something called you 🤬🤬🤬🤬.

June 19th at 11pm, either 1 or 3 USB drives plugged into the laptop in the evidence room, downloaded 🤬🤬🤬🤬 and then deleted it.

All according to sue.

Bu..bu..but...they said June 1 2008 and then June 19 2009! I have no idea what went on today.
 
  • #1,086
Well, evidently, she isn't taking DP off the table or hasn't ruled yet?

That's my take.

When Monday came and went, and then she deferred until today, you knew it would be a no-decision.
 
  • #1,087
William Pitts ‏@william_pitts · 25s25 seconds ago
Nurmi on damage control to explain what Autopsy is. Smith says he uses it because he helps develop it. #JodiArias

Great!!! the anonymous dude is beta testing software with the forensic evidence on a DP case. :)
 
  • #1,088
None of this provides the jury any reason to spare her life. All these attempts to try and make TA into a 🤬🤬🤬🤬 watching dude (um, like millions of others out there), does not provide a legal reason for someone to murder him. All the delays and motions and lengthening this phase still does not do anything to give the jury what they need to make a decision on mitigation. In fact it gives them no mitigation.
 
  • #1,089
Guys the fact that she says we're going into Feb should be a clear indicator she is denying the motions.

Yes MeeBee, but why can't she say it, so there is no doubt, and the media... cough, cough, Kiefer... can't spin it and so it is CLEAR. The allegations were vicious- why not put them to rest?

Why not AZL?
 
  • #1,090
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 31s 31 seconds ago
Judge promises a full day on Tuesday. We are in recess!!:gaah:

hahahaha they have never had a full day
 
  • #1,091
Time for a Baileys. They have my head spinning today.

So, does JSS' ruling just get slipped into the Minutes when no-one is looking?
 
  • #1,092
Great!!! the anonymous dude is beta testing software with the forensic evidence on a DP case. :)

So he can advertise that is was used in a high profile case? Seriously that make sense.

Is KN or JW or BN an investor in this software co? Or JSS?????
 
  • #1,093
None of this provides the jury any reason to spare her life. All these attempts to try and make TA into a 🤬🤬🤬🤬 watching dude (um, like millions of others out there), does not provide a legal reason for someone to murder him. All the delays and motions and lengthening this phase still does not do anything to give the jury what they need to make a decision on mitigation. In fact it gives them no mitigation.

The jury is surely sitting there thinking all this becusse he watched some 🤬🤬🤬🤬? Annnndddd?
 
  • #1,094
Guys the fact that she says we're going into Feb should be a clear indicator she is denying the motions.


:seeya:

BBM: Sorry MeeBee, but I must disagree ... :)

Until we see a Ruling/Decision/Order DENYING these Motions, then and only then will I believe it !
 
  • #1,095
Guys the fact that she says we're going into Feb should be a clear indicator she is denying the motions.

... and that she's deferring yet again beyond her self-imposed deadlines -- twice.
 
  • #1,096
  • #1,097
Yes MeeBee, but why can't she say it, so there is no doubt, and the media... cough, cough, Kiefer... can't spin it and so it is CLEAR. The allegations were vicious- why not put them to rest?

Why not AZL?

I don't really know what difference it makes. Her ruling will probably be quite lengthy and she will release it in time. Her saying we are moving forward is all I need really. Don't see it is a thang.
 
  • #1,098
Sounds like JSS is allowing Neumeister to come back and testify about 🤬🤬🤬🤬 again. She already said he would be back on the 20th. makes no sense to me. But this whole day made no sense. Please sleuthers, don't defend this judge anymore.
 
  • #1,099
We are going to need another poll:

Nurmi and Jodi get 5 more full days to dream up motions.
 
  • #1,100
I still do not understand why the jury is hearing all of this testimony about the computer 🤬🤬🤬🤬. Is this about pros. misconduct or is it about mitigation?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
121
Guests online
3,252
Total visitors
3,373

Forum statistics

Threads
632,627
Messages
18,629,355
Members
243,225
Latest member
2co
Back
Top