Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 26

[Truth Detector]

If there was truly child on the bishop's computer, the bishop is guilty of possession of child .

If <modsnip> actually viewed child then he is guilty of that crime.

Wonder about the statute of limitations.

Perhaps that's what <modsnip> doing in New Zealand where he can't be prosecuted for his role in viewing/possessing child while in the U.S.

 

[Nali87]

How can Wilmott and Nurmi and Dr. Gefner sleep at night? Unbelievable.

 

[ziggy]

This report says as Jodi looked back on that night she had little memory, and loved TA so much, she couldn't reconcile she had done it so made up a story that put the pieces together??

 

[ScarlettScarpetta]

Im just so infuriated that they are allowed to talk about this lie about the pics of the boys without any proof. Just more of her lies..

 

[rose222]

How can Wilmott and Nurmi and Dr. Gefner sleep at night? Unbelievable.

Rolling around in blood money.

 

[josie1986]

can i post this here? too late i guess...will delete if not allowed

 

[geevee]

Cathy &#8207;@courtchatter · 1m1 minute ago
In true Juan fashion, I ask witness #1 - Were you lying then or are you lying now? #jodiarias

Michael Kiefer &#8207;@michaelbkiefer · 58s58 seconds ago
Willmott reads from notes: #jodiarias hazy at first at what she did, would not reconcile it to herself. Made up stories.

 

[AZlawyer]

AZL why does this happen? I don't understand how she is questioning Geff when jury isn't present?

TIA

If an answer might cause a mistrial, it will be asked outside the presence of the jury first. Also if something has already been ruled inadmissible but the attorney wants to make an "offer of proof" about what the witness would have said if he'd been allowed to answer.

Call Facebook!
Is this possible AZL?

I suppose Dr. DeMarte could say she discounted this information because the witness was not credible for various reasons, including contradictory statements made online.

It's possible, though, that JM will not want to suggest to the jury that it is OK for experts to consider anonymous hearsay from questionable sources, so he will want Dr. DeM to rely only on "real" evidence.

Also, JSS might reasonably say that experts can rely on hearsay affidavits made under oath to the mitigation specialist but not on hearsay Facebook posts possibly not even made by the person whose name is attached to them.

 

[NashBridges2]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 31s 32 seconds ago
Handwritten notes says pictures not internet...7 year old boys #jodiarias #3tvarias

I wonder if at the bottom of the picture it said 7 year old boy lol

 

[josie1986]

Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 1m 1 minute ago
As #Jodiarias looked back at the night she was trying to put things together, she couldn't reconcile she did it and made a different story

BS BS BS

she knew fine well what she did and her 'secret' testimony makes that VERY clear imo

 

[geevee]

Carolyn Sung &#8207;@CarolynSungCNN · 48s48 seconds ago
Notes from psychologist say #jodiarias lied about TA death and made up stories because she couldn't reconcile she did it.

 

[ILikeToBendPages]

And child watcher, that Marc McGee.

and admitted he'd looked at it long enough to describe the sex acts and positions. Was it a first time?

 

[katydid23]

You see, that was the "brilliance" of convincing JSS the need for secret affidavits, in order to unmask this liar JM would have to show the postings with his real name attached, and that won't be allowed. The defense knew exactly where they were headed with this mystery witness baloney.

But they could redact the name. And allow the posts and tweets be shown.

 

[dog.gone.cute]

I don't even want to see that evil psycho's face right now.

:seeya: Sorry for posting that photo, Nali, and to everyone else !

But ... I wanted to post it so everyone can the difference in her "attire" from Thursday's "sleeveless shirt" to today's "librarian look" !

:gaah: :gaah: :gaah: . . . :censored:

 

[LinasK]

If this is truly Geffner's last day, then won't Juan have another chance at him to refute this BS? Or does Juan do it through other witnesses like the Bishop & his wife, Deanna, Abe???

 

[geevee]

Michael Kiefer &#8207;@michaelbkiefer · 43s43 seconds ago
Geffner says that all but one of the notes about #jodiarias walking in on masturbation said that he was looking at pictures, not computer

Tammy Rose &#8207;@News20Chopper · 29s29 seconds ago
"There's this one time in band camp..." that's all I'm hearing with these affidavits. Next. #JodiArias

 

[Hope4More]

Carolyn Sung &#8207;@CarolynSungCNN · 8s9 seconds ago
A few more exhibits admitted by Willmott. Notes from psychologist. #jodiarias

More additional evidence during redirect? Do we know that JM gets a chance to get back up?

 

[MeeBee]

If this is truly Geffner's last day, then won't Juan have another chance at him to refute this BS? Or does Juan do it through other witnesses like the Bishop & his wife, Deanna, Abe???

There's still juror questions.

 

[Nali87]

If an answer might cause a mistrial, it will be asked outside the presence of the jury first. Also if something has already been ruled inadmissible but the attorney wants to make an "offer of proof" about what the witness would have said if he'd been allowed to answer.



I suppose Dr. DeMarte could say she discounted this information because the witness was not credible for various reasons, including contradictory statements made online.

It's possible, though, that JM will not want to suggest to the jury that it is OK for experts to consider anonymous hearsay from questionable sources, so he will want Dr. DeM to rely only on "real" evidence.

Also, JSS might reasonably say that experts can rely on hearsay affidavits made under oath to the mitigation specialist but not on hearsay Facebook posts possibly not even made by the person whose name is attached to them.

If he would have taken the stand, could JM have crossed him on the Facebook posts and stuff like that? Feels you just broke my heart AZL.

 

[5bigfish5]

I hope the tortured face of Travis Alexander haunts JA and her enablers....including Sherry....forever. But, probably not. They are saying he is a vile child molester. Needed killing. I can't believe the evil that is being allowed in that courtroom....

I hope Travis visits the first foreman's dreams EVERY night.