Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 26

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #1,181
Jodi Arias Updates @JodiAnnArias
· 4h 4 hours ago
JM knowingly presenting false evidence AGAIN, trying to imply #jodiarias wrote messages in magazines.



LOL--so is she seriously saying that she was not the one writing to MM in that magazine that SHE herself tried to sneak out of her cell? ummm..ok

No...her supporters are. Because they are delusional. But this should put to rest that she is not the one directing this account. What happened to the one that she was? I think it was just her name and Donovan was doing it for her.

MOO
 
  • #1,182
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 11s 12 seconds ago
Geffner is saying the child custody case he worked on had a bad judge and the judge was forced to retire #jodiarias #3tvarias

not really a good idea to go bad mouthing judges is it?
 
  • #1,183
You mean the rule about witnesses being cross-examined? That definitely does apply.

As I mentioned before, the defense might fight for her statement to count as allocution instead of testimony. (Allocution generally is not subject to cross-examination.) If JSS allows that, IMO she will have to point out to the jury that it was not subject to cross-examination and that the jury may take that into account.

Thanks. The latter scenario must be what I'm remembering.
 
  • #1,184
How could one of these test be done pre jail and one while jailed? When and how was she tested pre-jail? This doc is beyond nuts imo

That is such a ridiculous comment that I don't know how Juan didn't turn on his heels and ask "The Geff" to repeat that to the court. I wouldn't even ask "The Geff" to explain himself. I would just point out to him she'd been in one jail or another since July of 2008. And if Geff tries to explain anyway, Juan would say "did I ask you a question?" C'mon, Juan... keep your Wingtip on his throat. :)
 
  • #1,185
Let's be fair here. TA not want to marry Deanna. He wanted to marry Linda Ballard Boss.

That doesn't mean he didn't love her. They remained close friends until end of his life and it was clear by the time the Hughes' wrote that email he was still hung up on her. He may have wanted to marry Linda Ballard at one point but that obviously didn't last because they were never engaged. Travis left the dog to Deanna. Anything for Jodi?
 
  • #1,186
If an answer might cause a mistrial, it will be asked outside the presence of the jury first. Also if something has already been ruled inadmissible but the attorney wants to make an "offer of proof" about what the witness would have said if he'd been allowed to answer.



I suppose Dr. DeMarte could say she discounted this information because the witness was not credible for various reasons, including contradictory statements made online.

It's possible, though, that JM will not want to suggest to the jury that it is OK for experts to consider anonymous hearsay from questionable sources, so he will want Dr. DeM to rely only on "real" evidence.

Also, JSS might reasonably say that experts can rely on hearsay affidavits made under oath to the mitigation specialist but not on hearsay Facebook posts possibly not even made by the person whose name is attached to them.

BBM - Unless of course it's Flores's wife. *snicker*
 
  • #1,187
Tammy Rose ‏@News20Chopper · 39s40 seconds ago
Now we are sidetracked once again with Dr. Geffner explaining why he was criticized in another case. #JodiArias
 
  • #1,188
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 11s 12 seconds ago
Geffner is saying the child custody case he worked on had a bad judge and the judge was forced to retire #jodiarias #3tvarias

not really a good idea to go bad mouthing judges is it?

And, now he's on this case with a bad judge who needs to be forced to retire....
 
  • #1,189
I am depressed beyond words. I waited all weekend for today. Then heard about DF son. Then today I see this pseudo-psychologist give lie after lie. All for the love of money. Doesn't anyone have integrity anymore? Why are these people defending her? There has never been any question of who committed this heinous murder. Why is this judge allowing all this in?
Please,whoever you are, don't tell me one more time that this judge wants to be sure she won't be overturned on appeals. Just let me ramble. Because I am crying for Travis' family.
 
  • #1,190
RG defends himself in a prior case where a judge criticized him. RG says it's the first time that has happened. He continues to defend his prior work.

I wonder if JW is done?
 
  • #1,191
Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN · 15s16 seconds ago
Willmott going over a diff case Geffner testified in. This case was talked about when Geffner first took the stand weeks ago. #jodiarias
 
  • #1,192
  • #1,193
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 11s 12 seconds ago
Geffner is saying the child custody case he worked on had a bad judge and the judge was forced to retire #jodiarias #3tvarias

not really a good idea to go bad mouthing judges is it?

Wonder how Judge S takes that?
 
  • #1,194
That doesn't mean he didn't love her. They remained close friends until end of his life and it was clear by the time the Hughes' wrote that email he was still hung up on her. He may have wanted to marry Linda Ballard at one point but that obviously didn't last because they were never engaged.
And he entrusted Deanna with Napoleon. That says it all for me.
 
  • #1,195
Geff allowed to answer what nothing noteworthy to report means... He says law of attraction means nothing my POSITIVE to say so she didn't write anything.

Oh dear Lord~~i just can't :moo::tantrum:
 
  • #1,196
Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN · 25s26 seconds ago
Geffner says he's not licensed to practice in Arizona but there is no problem w/ him testifying #jodiarias

So according to Geff's logic then any old shmo off the street could also testify and his opinion is as good as any old shmo off the street.
 
  • #1,197
Carolyn Sung ‏@CarolynSungCNN · 23s24 seconds ago
Geffner mentions, as he previously did) the judge on this case was forced to retire due to controversy. #jodiarias
 
  • #1,198
Quote Originally Posted by ziggy View Post
Sorry about my typos. Texting skills bad.
Feb 5 she writes about getting fired Friday m Mimi's. Also a note that TA Was abusive to her. All juror eyes are up. Evidence in texts that TA apologizes consistent with her reports. He says sorry about what happens to her (firing). JW trying to show JA is consistent with what she writes and what she tells psychologists.
How do we know he was not sorry she lost her job, times are stressful (economy) and maybe a blessing that a better opportunity is around the corner. JMO

Yes he is saying it may be a blessing in disguise- JW point sometimes hard to follow but it is that what JA wrote, what she told psychologists all cohesive so the jury will buy that she caught TA mast to pics of 7 yo boys, then he abused her and broke her finger but journal refers to the absence of entries due to nothing noteworthy is bcuz of law of attraction.
 
  • #1,199
I am depressed beyond words. I waited all weekend for today. Then heard about DF son. Then today I see this pseudo-psychologist give lie after lie. All for the love of money. Doesn't anyone have integrity anymore? Why are these people defending her? There has never been any question of who committed this heinous murder. Why is this judge allowing all this in?
Please,whoever you are, don't tell me one more time that this judge wants to be sure she won't be overturned on appeals. Just let me ramble. Because I am crying for Travis' family.

What happened to his son?
 
  • #1,200
And he entrusted Deanna with Napoleon. That says it all for me.

Yep I added a little eta on that at the end of the post. Travis left his dog to her. Did he leave anything to Jodi?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
100
Guests online
2,533
Total visitors
2,633

Forum statistics

Threads
632,727
Messages
18,630,993
Members
243,274
Latest member
WickedGlow
Back
Top