Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 28

Status
Not open for further replies.
Brits..(hope you don't me replying)., The only conclusion that makes any sense to me is that JA has convinced herself that it doesn't matter what sentence she gets because she really does believe the guilty verdict will be overturned.

She's better off in many ways if she DOES get the DP. More appeals. Polishes her role as wrongly imprisoned DV who simply defended herself. Feeds her fan base.

As she said to Flores BEFORE she invented the ninjas...." My life is over." In other words, nothing left to lose.

We can't understand the DT's strategy because there is no strategy in play to present mitigation. There is only a psychopath terrorizing the courtroom, demanding the opportunity to use every means available to destroy Travis and cause pain to those who love him. Its one gigantic FU to JM, Flores, Deanna, Lisa, Mimi, Sky and Chris.......every last person she hopes to sully and harm.

And somehow I bet she's saving her ugliest for allocution.

IF Jodi isn't there, she should be. There is very little left of this train wreck of a trial.

What is next, some time late summer....starve her to almost death, so she comes out pleading from a gurney for her life?
 
I do think this is the Jodi version of mitigation. We saw what Nurmi chose to do last time--he basically had her say that she could sort of draw and had hair that could be donated etc. Then Jodi filed 7 million motions (or maybe like 2--I lost count) saying that Nurmi refused to follow her strategy and specifically refused to call certain witnesses who had totally BOMBSHELL testimony that would make her case. Nurmi tried his best to get off the case, but JSS said he had to stay, so now IMO he's saying FINE let's see how your brilliant mitigation strategy works Miss Jodi.

I don't think there will be any negative repercussions for them.

Hi AZl...
I have been thinking today about Jodi's allocution this time around. I believe she is too much of a psychopath to ever show remorse. I am thinking she may just defy everyone and tell the jury she is a victim of domestic violence and abuse, that she HAD to defend herself, and that the jury OWES it to her to give her life, with the possibility that she may start over one day (maybe after 25 years). Do you think she would do that? That's what I am expecting. I know that idea sounds totally insane but this is JA we are speaking of. What do you think?
 
What about the Hughes?
Should they be called?
Would the jury wonder why they weren't called?
 
Totally agree. I anticipate a full on meltdown of epic porportions after today's final nail in the coffin of JA's "mitigation".

So, what we can look for over the coming days are highly delusional statements with no basis in reality, a spike in claims that JA's conviction will for sure be overturned on appeal now,a complete character assassination of the Bishop and Deanna, a whole host of allegations that every witness for the state is lying but JA is telling the truth, that KN has for sure got this and will impeach the Church Elder handily, and my personal favorite, that what happened today totally proves what they have been saying all along--that "Pickles" is in the Prosecution's pocket. :laughing::bang:

I have missed this: who is Pickles? Thanks.
 
Because they knew they would be suborning perjury.

Hasn't stopped them yet.

'Course with Sherry at the helm, it is a roll of the dice.

HOWEVER!

NOT ONE LIAR has been held accountable yet. I say, chances are.........
 
{Just catching up; reading DT's stinko questions of DR.} Realize, Steely, your post is about JA's Twitter account ... but: PLEASE! PLEASE! Just one hour suspension of the WS TOS???!!!! My fingers are itchin' to type what my brain is thinkin'. Call me the Outlaw of Attraction.
You could do what CMJA did in that Star Magazine or Photography mag. Just bold the first letter of a sentence to make a "True" sentence. We will sleuth it. :)
 
He's no longer a Mormon. And is very bitter about the church.

Really? Wow, I wonder if his bitterness was motive for him doing this affidavit. Seems he is smitten with the killer but if he can at the same time sling mud toward a church that he is now very bitter about...sounds like a plan, eh?
 
Brits..(hope you don't me replying)., The only conclusion that makes any sense to me is that JA has convinced herself that it doesn't matter what sentence she gets because she really does believe the guilty verdict will be overturned.

She's better off in many ways if she DOES get the DP. More appeals. Polishes her role as wrongly imprisoned DV who simply defended herself. Feeds her fan base.

As she said to Flores BEFORE she invented the ninjas...." My life is over." In other words, nothing left to lose.

We can't understand the DT's strategy because there is no strategy in play to present mitigation. There is only a psychopath terrorizing the courtroom, demanding the opportunity to use every means available to destroy Travis and cause pain to those who love him. Its one gigantic FU to JM, Flores, Deanna, Lisa, Mimi, Sky and Chris.......every last person she hopes to sully and harm.

And somehow I bet she's saving her ugliest for allocution.
We are thinking alike tonight. :)
 
Hi AZl...
I have been thinking today about Jodi's allocution this time around. I believe she is too much of a psychopath to ever show remorse. I am thinking she may just defy everyone and tell the jury she is a victim of domestic violence and abuse, that she HAD to defend herself, and that the jury OWES it to her to give her life, with the possibility that she may start over one day (maybe after 25 years). Do you think she would do that? That's what I am expecting. I know that idea sounds totally insane but this is JA we are speaking of. What do you think?

Isn't that what she did last time? You know with her DV T-shirts?
 
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 25s 25 seconds ago
Willmott wants to know everything Deanna told the Bishop about the sexual contact and Juan objects and it's sustained #jodiarias #3tvarias

JW: Please. Really? Your client revels in sexual play-by-play, nauseating TMI on the stand because 1) she has no shame, and 2) she's trying really, really hard to convince the world that Travis was someone he wasn't. Just because Jodi does that doesn't mean everybody has to, and thank God for that.
 
Im' asking this question simply because so much evidence that the Defence has bullied into the court. Can any of these witness's actually sue defence collectively in a civil suit for defamations of character? So much of what they have chosen to present either comes from a convicted felon/or liars..and obviously proven today as perjured statements ( allowed by the court)? Can the court also be charged with allowing such defamations??

Jodi threatened to do exactly what she is doing. That is smear reputations if they (state) doesn't agree to her terms...I have to say..she not only has succeeded in HER mission..She has caused $$$ costs to taxpayers..and direct reputation slandering. I've seen over and over again so many accusations proven to be unfounded and shown to be lies..Yet Judge Stephen's allows them to continue with this cr$$$olla...Good decent people have been hurt by Jodi and her minions..Surely there is recourse to deal with that..including Nurm's and Willy!!
 
Immigration papers? You sound like a fool JW.

JW is either extremely stupid or extremely mean with this immigration paper question. DR is almost certainly an American citizen. She was not immigrating or emigrating anywhere. She was not going anywhere permanently or to become a citizen. There are no "papers" for being an American citizen and not immigrating or emigrating anywhere. Costa Rica doesn't even require a visa for an American citizen, for gosh sake, and even if so, a visa is a stamp in the passport. "Immigration papers" in this country brings up a specter of non-citizens in the US who are here legitimately but not especially welcomed. JMO JW is playing a racist card and trying to pander to someone on the jury. Here, we associate "not having immigration papers" with illegals. She's giving DR the aura of not being on the "up and up".
 
Thanks all for your tweets and insightful posts. I tried to keep up thanking as i went along LOL I did read every single post. Thanks also Ziggy for your great inside the Courtroom posts. Today was a really great day! More to come I'm sure. I pray she gets the DP. She deserves it. The Family wants it. I support it. One of my main reasons is wanting whatever time she has left to be isolated. LWOP would afford her more freedoms than Death Row. IMO she would adapt quite well to life behind bars. She is trying to destroy anyone living who loved Travis. Ironic. In the process she is only destroying herself. She is the driving force behind her soon to be decided fate. I pray it's the DP!
 
Jodi's probably long been ex-communicated. She never read her bible in Jail, she "dabbled", and she was always a "Jack Mormon" drinking caffeine and having sex anyhow. And murder is #2 sin for the Mormons after adultery.

Actually murder is #1. Sexual transgression is #2, adultery but also includes premarital sex.
https://www.sunstonemagazine.com/pdf/143-34-43.pdf


TRADITIONALLY, LATTER-DAY SAINTS HAVE RANKED
sexual transgressions as “next to murder” in order of serious
sins. In 1942, the First Presidency of Heber J.
Grant, J. Reuben Clark, and David O. McKay declared that
“sexual sin—the illicit sexual relations of men and women—
stands, in its enormity, next to murder.”1 “Breaking the law of
chastity,” wrote President Kimball, “is one of the most serious
sins next to murder.”2 “In the category of sins,” explained
President Ezra Taft Benson, “unchastity stands next to
murder.”3 Adultery, Harold B. Lee said in a priesthood address,
is “one of the greatest of all the sins next to murder.”
 
Now I'm really curious what you want to post. Can you type it up in MadLib format or something?

Nah. I'm not one to write material online that I might one day regret (although, unfortunately, email is another story :gaah:). I understand the DT is scrambling and has nothing. But that question to DR about (paraphrasing) "What sexual acts with TA did you talk about with the Bishop," sent me supersonic. It was, apparently, disallowed by way of an objection. But lawdy, boy-how, lawdy.

In the first trial, they caught DR off guard and accused her of lying in pre-trial interviews. THIS time, she catches the DT off-guard ... and they scream down slime highway in an attempt to further embarrass her.

Harumph. So ... In an attempt to be "Christ-like," let me "soothingly" and "lovingly" say to the DT: STFU. (In case that's against WS TOS, I'm sure there's a NASA acronym that works ... with a different meaning, of course.)
 
Well I guess these bombshell witnesses were MM et al, and if BBM is true, it's no wonder Nurmi didn't want to use them. This was as effective as the forged pedo letters. She's in way over her head, but simply refuses to except that fact. Just another example of how delusional she is, and how such denial can derail the best laid plans.

I dont have a clue of who BBM is, but I'm on a couple of newsgroups who have a squiggly line under often used anacronyms that you can click on it and it expands with a a definition. This would be wonderful here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
162
Guests online
1,028
Total visitors
1,190

Forum statistics

Threads
626,154
Messages
18,521,430
Members
240,946
Latest member
Kimberly 71
Back
Top