Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 15s 15 seconds ago
Nurmi- Is Deanna Reid married with children?
Parker- No #jodiarias #3tvarias
Ouch. That came from JA and I hate her for it.
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 15s 15 seconds ago
Nurmi- Is Deanna Reid married with children?
Parker- No #jodiarias #3tvarias
I wish the sick juror would stand up and hurl all over Nurmi
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 10s 10 seconds ago
Nurmi is asking if there is a difference between one time transgression and two times #jodiarias #3tvarias
Did we ever find out the "layout" of the bishops house for pete sake?
According to Beth, Parker answered that question with 'There are a lot of variables.' Nurmi's next question was to ask if Deanna is married - she isn't.Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 24s 25 seconds ago
Nurmi- If someone is having sex do they become less desirable as a partner
Parker- I can't answer that #jodiarias #3tvarias
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 10s 10 seconds ago
Nurmi is asking if there is a difference between one time transgression and two times #jodiarias #3tvarias
Cathy ‏@courtchatter · 2m2 minutes ago
Nurmi asks if a person is less desirable if they've had sexual transgressions, then follows up with Deanna never married. Nice. #jodiarias
Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ · 55s56 seconds ago
@courtchatter THis is unreal
Jen's Trial Diaries @TrialDiariesJ · 39s 39 seconds ago
Nurmi says so after Linda leaves TA, he then begins dating Deanna Reid after she came back from her mission #jodiarias #3tvarias
Cathy ‏@courtchatter · 2m2 minutes ago
Nurmi asks if a person is less desirable if they've had sexual transgressions, then follows up with Deanna never married. Nice. #jodiarias
Jen's Trial Diaries ‏@TrialDiariesJ · 55s56 seconds ago
@courtchatter THis is unreal
Oh great! Now the whole panel will be sick and a mistrial will be declared!:tantrum:
So MM, when he was hanging around the supporter page, realized that maybe TA had been living at the house when he reported these popups to the Bishop and he emailed the Bishop to find out before starting his lies about TA? The Bishop erred because he seems a little confused (early dementia?) and told him that TA did live there around the time the fiancé was there. He thought nothing of this email or question so he did not verify the exact dates. It was the same year though. The Bishop was also rather vague about things when he talked to Nurmi. He was never called on in the first trial so that was the end of it as far as he knew.
Until now. And suddenly it became important to get the information exactly correct. He screwed up with the date Jake lived there and when the "pop ups" may have first appeared on the computer. Big mistake IMO. Unless Jake did live there between Travis and the fiancé because he was having trouble with the wife.
I hope JM clears this up.
MOO
he must think the days go backwards in other countries...
I don't get why the judge isn't telling Nurmi he's been over this and to move on.