Retrial for Sentencing of Jodi Arias - Day 5

[TexMex]

Not to mention all the pictures of breasts on her computer vs. not one sexual thing on his.

In fact, Juan mentioned that Travis would have been the first pedophile in the history of pedophila to not have a single inappropriate photo on his computer

 

[DebinGA]

Not to mention all the pictures of breasts on her computer vs. not one sexual thing on his.

That reminds me of JA's "abuse" of Darryl. He lost his job, his house, and paid for JA's boob job for other men to enjoy.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Would someone remind where in the saga the sex tape was made? Was JA still living in Mesa? Wasn't it near the "You're the worst thing that ever happened to me" point?

She was living in Yreka, CA. he was living in Mesa, AZ.

 

[Kensie]

That reminds me of JA's "abuse" of Darryl. He lost his job, his house, and paid for JA's boob job for other men to enjoy.

The killer is definitely a train wreck.

 

[Dmacky]

Or he send her one because she says she's into superheroes.

Maybe, but I think there would have been a reference to Spiderman undies. He only said I don't really care for SM. Jodi or him would have surely mentioned them right then and there IF they existed. MOO

 

[oceanblueeyes]

If I was Juan, during closings I would remind the jury that the defendant did everything she could to destroy Travis' character even after she had already slaughtered him. Slaughtering him wasn't good enough for her. He needs to remind them of when the allegations of abuse and pedophilia came about. Just more lies she concocted in her evil head like she did the ninja story and the 'I wasn't there' story or the 'you need to look at his roommate' story.

Always blaming her own actions on someone else.

The juror that put the question in the box should be asking 'WTH does this have to do with whether she gets the DP or not?'

Why JS is allowing Nurmi to retry this case and even changing the DT theory in mid stream leaves me smh because I just don't see how all of this is relevant in this phase.

I would be upset as a juror because its not wise to try and dirty up a victim who suffered as much as Travis did. Having a sex phone talk with Arias isn't what got him murdered. What did was when he told her to leave him alone for good.

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Or he send her one because she says she's into superheroes.

I don't think he ever sent her anything and it sure wouldn't be SM.....which he didn't like anyway.

She is truly the biggest liar I have ever seen. I believe she can top even CA.

If he had really sent her something she would have still had it since she was obsessed with him. The SM undies never existed nor the candy either and that is why they never found the SM undies.

 

[Love Never Fails]

If I was Juan, during closings I would remind the jury that the defendant did everything she could to destroy Travis' character even after she had already slaughtered him. Slaughtering him wasn't good enough for her. He needs to remind them of when the allegations of abuse and pedophilia came about. Just more lies she concocted in her evil head like she did the ninja story and the 'I wasn't there' story or the 'you need to look at his roommate' story.

Always blaming her own actions on someone else.

The juror that put the question in the box should be asking 'WTH does this have to do with whether she gets the DP or not?'

Why JS is allowing Nurmi to retry this case and even changing the DT theory in mid stream leaves me smh because I just don't see how all of this is relevant in this phase.

I would be upset as a juror because its not wise to try and dirty up a victim who suffered as much as Travis did. Having a sex phone talk with Arias isn't what got him murdered. What did was when he told her to leave him alone for good.

question. What does SMH mean? I have seen it on other threads also. Thanks.

 

[Nosey Parker]

I'm trying to figure out why the sex tape was introduced with Flores on the stand. He didn't unearth it, Menendez (sp?) or Arias did, so Flores cannot even authenticate it, can he? Are you there, AZlawyer?

 

[katydid23]

question. What does SMH mean? I have seen it on other threads also. Thanks.

Shake My Head :no:

 

[Love Never Fails]

I could be very wrong but I truly believe there is now a greater possibility of the killer facing the DP. This time around they already know she is guilty and she is just trying to smutty the victim. Makes her look worse than during the first trial...if that is even a possibility. Her attorneys look like low-life as well.

 

[Love Never Fails]

Shake My Head :no:

Thanks! I could never figure it out.

 

[Hez]

If I was Juan, during closings I would remind the jury that the defendant did everything she could to destroy Travis' character even after she had already slaughtered him. Slaughtering him wasn't good enough for her. He needs to remind them of when the allegations of abuse and pedophilia came about. Just more lies she concocted in her evil head like she did the ninja story and the 'I wasn't there' story or the 'you need to look at his roommate' story.

Always blaming her own actions on someone else.

The juror that put the question in the box should be asking 'WTH does this have to do with whether she gets the DP or not?'

Why JS is allowing Nurmi to retry this case and even changing the DT theory in mid stream leaves me smh because I just don't see how all of this is relevant in this phase.

I would be upset as a juror because its not wise to try and dirty up a victim who suffered as much as Travis did. Having a sex phone talk with Arias isn't what got him murdered. What did was when he told her to leave him alone for good.

BUBM - I can't wait to see Juan drive a Mack truck through this latest defense 'theory', whatever it is. :happydance: Nurmi better have an umbrella handy because he is going to get splashed with the truth as that truck drives on by! :badmood:

 

[Kensie]

Shake My Head :no:

I was wondering what it meant too!!

 

[oceanblueeyes]

question. What does SMH mean? I have seen it on other threads also. Thanks.

shake my head or shaking my head.

 

[DebinGA]

Wasn't the nonexistent pedo-pic of a young boy wearing Spiderman briefs?

 

[oceanblueeyes]

BUBM - I can't wait to see Juan drive a Mack truck through this latest defense 'theory', whatever it is. :happydance: Nurmi better have an umbrella handy because he is going to get splashed with the truth as that truck drives on by! :badmood:

I don't see how Juan can sit there and listen to all of this concocted BS. And the way Nurmi has dogged Juan continuously has to infuriate the hell out of Juan.

Oh yeah, no doubt about it ....Juan has that big Mack truck warmed up and ready to go! It cant be soon enough for me.

 

[LaLaw2000]

I would have nothing but disgust for Jodie were I one of the juror's. She and Nurmi are thoroughly disgusting.

At least we didn't have to actually hear the sex tape this time, but I just wish my memory wasn't as good as it is!

I.Hate.This. Vile. Woman.

 

[wenwe4]

Wasn't the nonexistent pedo-pic of a young boy wearing Spiderman briefs?

I don't remember them being "spiderman" briefs - I only remember "briefs".

(also non-existent or just some random ad in a magazine that had nothing to do with TA - IMO)

 

[oceanblueeyes]

Wasn't the nonexistent pedo-pic of a young boy wearing Spiderman briefs?

Yes, and I think there is a picture of Travis when he was a really young boy wearing that kind of briefs I think.

That's probably where the evil one got the idea.

Not one bit of of any kind was found in Travis' home or phone or computer. None and to know she has told this horrible wicked lie on a totally innocent man makes my blood boil!