CARIIS
Former Member
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2012
- Messages
- 25,470
- Reaction score
- 10,696
JMO but i think that would be a total mistake to try to transmit the information only when required because that is another point of possible failure. We have seen time + time again that things just dont work right when accidents happen. IMO, they just need something very simple and to transmit the GPS location all the time in a fairly frequent basis. Once every 30 seconds would be good enough for me, although even more frequently would be better. Just the location is all that is needed IMO.
Yeh, I agree. And its all the media. IN the history of aviation, MAL is a anomoly. THe notion that we have to invest 7 trillion dollors to correct a non problem is just that. The truth here is, typically, just like here with AIsia, yeh it takes 3=5 days, over water, to locate, a very few plane crashes that occur over water.
And its social media. The notion that one nneds to know where a crash airliner is within 2.5 seconds is the cell phone generation stuff. Low frustration tolerances, but in reality I cant think of an aviation wreck where knowing in 2.5 seconds exactly where the plane had crashed changes any utlimate outcomes!
NTSB, Canada, France,Britain agencies have done amazing just amazing stuff in getting to what one needs to know- what happened and why to try and avoid a repeat. Aviation has done so amazinly. WHich is also (!) going to translate to big issue for AIrbus, if this turns out to be a mirror AF - very very big problem for them. The whole reason for accident investigation is to avoid repeat if poss. IF this ends up , where the computers on this flight blocked the flight crew from doing certain things because it was "thinking" on wrong data, then we are right back where we were the night of AF .
ANd AIrbus is going to have an aweful lot of trouble ($$$) explaining why it did not recify the problem on this series.
Suspensful music: "Your honor, you felt the pivot tubes were dangerous enough to warrent a refit on your A340/A330 series,did you not? More music. What rationial do you have to explain not refitting your A320 series? Music picks up a bit now!
Can you provide the court, other than financials, the reasons why the problematic tube remains (build up the music) to this very day sir, (soaring cresendo of heart pounding music now) aboard all your A320 aircraft? Cymbals crash and silence.
Closeup on the greedy CEO, Americans in the court room jumping up and down seeing $$$ signs, and the jurors gasping!
Next headline. Jury awards victims 32.4 trillion in damages. The story goes away. Airbus fights. Ten years later Airbuss agrees to actually depart with 1.6 million, but the story is stale so noone knows that nothing happened as a result of cooperate greed. Rinse repeat!