Russia Attacks Ukraine - 23 Feb 2022 #13

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #141
Moo...does USA have any foreign bases on their soil?.. the reason USA bases are on foreign soil, is an agreement to defend. But if the agreement has changed, USA cannot ask for payment. The only reason the USA is powerful is because they have military bases all over the world. But now the USA wants money for doing nothing. I do find it a lot scary that friend is now for ..unless you pay up...moo
I know we are going to start having German bases and we are going there also.
If he needs a chaperone or hand-holding, he really isn't ready for the big times and should step down immediately. I'm guessing, though, that Starmer made it clear to Zelensky that he needed to put on his big boy pants and go back and make the deal.
Nah the problem is we can not keep having our allies attacked by thugs in the White house.
 
  • #142

This article includes a breakdown of financials for various countries who have given grants and LOANS to Ukraine. I don't know that it's unreasonable to expect some compensation. Funds are just not unlimited and the United States has given a lot. Plenty of countries in Europe also have loaned money so I'd assume that means there is an agreement that compensation at some point will be provided.

I don't agree that President Trump is siding with Putin. I think he's trying to get a peace deal that benefits Ukraine and prevents WW3.
I don't really think most people think it will stop WW3 tbh. Anything but in fact.
 
  • #143
Arent they elected senators?
t put people who fawned over him into extremely important spots. Dangerous as no qualifications, none. Military head is one. Normal presidents, either way, put in extremely qualified people with background and well experienced. THe first time around, the qualified and sane people left, walked out. Never been done before. This time around, just anyone, like here you go, you and you and ummm you.
 
  • #144
One rule. If you know that you are not personally liked, don’t dwell on a person’s nerves. Zelenskiy knew that he was invited to the Oval Office because of the deal. He tried to make it about everything else before the deal. So it happened as it did.

It became an issue of personalities. Trump who is blunt essentially said, you have bet on Biden last time, now I am elected (he said something about all the counties turning red), and with me, the rules are different.

I think lengthy meeting was unnecessary given the prior history. You came, you sign, you leave. The problem is, even some Ukrainian commentators say that at European meetings, there is some cross of boundaries by Zelenskyy (like, not taking an interpreter). Here, whatever he did, was viewed as boundaries crossed.

And I yet haven’t made up my mind as to why Vance intervened.
Yet most did not think the boundaries crossed

IMO Vance was the cause of most of it. He has previously said he didnt care what happened to Ukraine.
 
  • #145
"Donald Trump is not planning to sign a minerals deal between the US and Ukraine tonight, Scott Bessent has said.

Earlier reports indicated that Mr Trump was planning to conclude the controversial “rare earths” deal this evening and announce it in his joint address to Congress just after 9pm ET.

However, Mr Bessent, the US Treasury Secretary, told Fox News there was “no signing planned”.

White House insiders said there had not been any movement on the proposal, which would grant the US half of Ukraine’s revenues from its critical minerals as payback for military support.

It was due to be signed last week but was placed on ice following an explosive row between Mr Trump and Mr Zelensky in the Oval Office on Friday.

One person familiar with talks between the US and Ukraine told CBS News that the Republican was now holding out for a “bigger, better deal”.

The Ukrainian president said earlier today that he was “ready” to sign the agreement hours after Mr Trump suspended all military aid to Kyiv, calling it a “step toward” in securing “solid security agreements” from the administration.


Mr Trump is set to speak at 9pm local time to 2am GMT. You can watch the speech live on our stream here."

It says "the Republican was now holding out for a “bigger, better deal”." What does that mean? A bigger better deal? More for the US and less for Ukraine? Or is he considering adding the security requirements Zelensky wants? MOO

I hope this "bigger and better deal" Trump refers to, is not the one with Putin (Putin offered a rare minerals deal in Russia).
 
  • #146
<modsnip: Quote post was removed>
Moo...the USA has changed sides. They are ok with Russia moving in to take more land. USA wants Canada, Panama, Gaza, Greenland. How do we get this back on track????....moo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #147
Moo...does USA have any foreign bases on their soil?.. the reason USA bases are on foreign soil, is an agreement to defend. But if the agreement has changed, USA cannot ask for payment. The only reason the USA is powerful is because they have military bases all over the world. But now the USA wants money for doing nothing. I do find it a lot scary that friend is now foe. .unless you pay up...moo
We do not have any foreign bases here in the US, but we have plenty of foreign servicemembers here at the US bases working and going to schools and training. My source is I live on a base and know some of them, I've lived at other bases where they are working and training.

I don't see that any agreement has changed. We have Americans all over Europe ready to defend. We do not have a base in Ukraine. I also don't see the deal that was proposed as the US wanting money for nothing. We have provided money and resources already.
 
  • #148
"Sanctioned cargo vessel was given armed protection to transport military hardware from Syria towards the front line in Ukraine
A sanctioned Russian cargo ship crewed by men in military fatigues has transported military hardware through the English Channel, escorted by a Russian warship, as President Putin bolsters his Ukraine war effort with weapons from Syria.
Dramatic pictures taken by The Times from a fishing vessel show armed officers and crew manning machine guns on the warship, as it passed through the south of the Channel."


The channel referred to is the English channel - between Britain and France

 
  • #149
We do not have any foreign bases here in the US, but we have plenty of foreign servicemembers here at the US bases working and going to schools and training. My source is I live on a base and know some of them, I've lived at other bases where they are working and training.

I don't see that any agreement has changed. We have Americans all over Europe ready to defend. We do not have a base in Ukraine. I also don't see the deal that was proposed as the US wanting money for nothing. We have provided money and resources already.
Moo...yea..that's kinda making me nervous now. If USA wants to get ..control...they are certainly set up to do that...moo
 
  • #150
The U.S. Department of Justice will bring charges against people on college and university campuses who intimidate and stop Jewish students from going to classes, and support terrorist organizations and protest ILLEGALLY. This has nothing to do with legal protests.

Sure, because everyone knows Trump hates illegal protesting. Except for when they are violently protesting to overturn an election which he lost. In that case, it's pardons for everyone and anyone who got convicted in court or even just arrested. :cool:
 
  • #151
We do not have any foreign bases here in the US, but we have plenty of foreign servicemembers here at the US bases working and going to schools and training. My source is I live on a base and know some of them, I've lived at other bases where they are working and training.

I don't see that any agreement has changed. We have Americans all over Europe ready to defend. We do not have a base in Ukraine. I also don't see the deal that was proposed as the US wanting money for nothing. We have provided money and resources already.
The U.S. has provided aid to allies without expecting direct payback, but under Trump, that approach has shifted. We didn’t send aid to Ukraine as a down payment on their natural resources; we sent it because supporting Ukraine aligns with our security interests and democratic values. Acting like we now need to “recoup” that support by pressuring Ukraine into a bad deal is a break from how U.S. foreign aid has historically worked. If securing resources was truly the goal, it should have been negotiated upfront—not weaponized while Ukraine is still fighting for survival. IMO
 
  • #152
"Sanctioned cargo vessel was given armed protection to transport military hardware from Syria towards the front line in Ukraine
A sanctioned Russian cargo ship crewed by men in military fatigues has transported military hardware through the English Channel, escorted by a Russian warship, as President Putin bolsters his Ukraine war effort with weapons from Syria.
Dramatic pictures taken by The Times from a fishing vessel show armed officers and crew manning machine guns on the warship, as it passed through the south of the Channel."


The channel referred to is the English channel - between Britain and France


Russia taking its weaponry back? Russia is the predominant supplier of weapons to Syria.

Or maybe oil?


The Syrian Arab Army has traditionally relied on the Soviet Union and its successor the Russian Federation as its main supplier of military equipment.

 
  • #153
  • #154
As the vapor of reality settles in...

Yes quite a bit of news on it today in previous posts. It was reported there would be a signing today. Then it was reported that Trump wasn't doing anything today and might be holding out for a "bigger better deal". We can only hope the deal comes off.
 
  • #155
Appears Canada and Mexico have come to the bargaining table with TRUMP....

 
  • #156
Ukraine has firepower to fight on without US support – for now

Dan Sabbagh and Luke Harding in Kyiv

Donald Trump’s decision to halt military aid is, however, likely to mean Ukraine will suffer more casualties at a faster rate

 
  • #157
Yes quite a bit of news on it today in previous posts. It was reported there would be a signing today. Then it was reported that Trump wasn't doing anything today and might be holding out for a "bigger better deal". We can only hope the deal comes off.
Just a question. They get their deal - what happens if/when Russia invades again?
 
  • #158
  • #159
Just a question. They get their deal - what happens if/when Russia invades again?
Trump can then turn Ukraine into a lavish resort…
 
  • #160
Senior roles in the government go through an entire process. Nomination, confirmation hearings, etc...
Musk went through none of that.
IMO.
Elon Musk is officially serving under President Donald Trump as a special government employee, according to a White House official.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was inside the Oval Office as Trump commented on Musk’s purview.

“Elon can’t do and won’t do anything without our approval. And we’ll give him the approval where appropriate. Where not appropriate, we won’t,” the president said.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
93
Guests online
2,436
Total visitors
2,529

Forum statistics

Threads
632,095
Messages
18,621,935
Members
243,019
Latest member
joslynd94
Back
Top