well wowow.scandi said:On the Lineup just now Kimberly said a NY newspaper hired an outside handwriting expert who has found that the ransom note and Karr's handwriting is a match!
Scandi
But the ransom note was analysed and it was without doubt Patsy Ramsey's.UKGuy said:Why bother analyzing the ransom note?
There was no kidnapping and no follow up telephone call. JonBenet's corpse was discovered in the basement, she had been sexually assaulted.
So the forensic evidence contradicts the rationale behind the ransom note, so any conclusions based on the ransom note may be of no value.
So was it a wannabe kidnapper, who was really a pedophile, unable to control himself, so decided to molest JonBenet, then stage a crime-scene implicating both parents via forensic evidence e.g. fibers?
.
I don't think so. Meaning the without a doubt part.librazone said:But the ransom note was analysed and it was without doubt Patsy Ramsey's.
Thank you for this link. I bookmarked it to read his analysis. If it does turn out that JMK wrote the note, and is responsible for JonBenet's death; I wonder if it will later come out that he had a prior connection to John Ramsey?windovervocalcords said:I love this guy's work. More at link.
http://www.statementanalysis.com/ramseynote/
scandi said:Bean, did you see that Wudge posted that Karr was in Colorado, like it was a sure thing. Wudge is such a stickler for the facts, that I wish he'd let us know what led him to this conclusion.
Wudge![]()
Scandi
JBean said:he has placed himself in Colorado and no one has proved otherwise..YET.
windovervocalcords said:No less than 10 handwriting analysts agreed it was Patsy. Some did not.
I am more convinced by Mark Mclish's statement analysis which speaks to the language and not the handwriting.
http://jonbenetramsey.pbwiki.com/The%20Ransom%20Note
Hi Close. There is a Q&A thread on the front page if you have any questions to post.They don't always get answered or you might get 2 different answers, but it's worth a shot.close_enough said:lol, ok...you answered my question....there's so much to read, i can't keep up :crazy:
Wrinkles said:Hello CloseEnough,
I found a link today... It says that a "file was opened at an undetermined point in his name..."
Check it out here
Referring to JMK the article says:
"However, while he had never applied for a teaching license, certification or authorization in the state of Colorado, a file was opened at an undetermined point in his name with the Colorado Department of Education. That may have been triggered by the submission of either test scores or fingerprints, signaling his intention to apply for a license. He never did so."
Things that make you go "hmmmmm" They don't date when they open a file?
As per what Wudge was stating, I have no clue, giving references seems a reasonable way to back statements. Perhaps Wudge has a reference?
Wrinkles
JBean said:Hi Close. There is a Q&A thread on the front page if you have any questions to post.They don't always get answered or you might get 2 different answers, but it's worth a shot.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=42224
windovervocalcords said:No less than 10 handwriting analysts agreed it was Patsy. Some did not.
I am more convinced by Mark Mclish's statement analysis which speaks to the language and not the handwriting.
http://jonbenetramsey.pbwiki.com/The%20Ransom%20Note
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.