Truly, the public will hear very, very, little, if anything, about any black program super secret spy satellite except in a case such as this, and then we still won't hear about the technology, or the operation of the satellite.Who was supposed to be 'babysitting' the spy satellite for the past year?
I cannot find it mentioned on any .gov website. TIA.![]()
Elphaba, it's wonderful that your father has worked on such a noted program. The pictures, and data, obtained by the Hubble, have been awesome, to say the least. I don't know how long your father has worked with Hubble, and this is a very long shot: ask him if he ever knew Nelson xxx, who was involved with the Hubble telemetry; Nelson worked for Lockheed, at least he did 20 years ago.He has moved into what he calls "babysitting" it... he works in data capture, now (he's nearing retirement)... I can ask him about an update.
Tm, I remember the BOMARC; that was almost at the beginning of time as far as missiles are concerned.Thank you all for such interesting information!
Elphaba, I have always been interested in the Hubble. DS almost did a report on it last year but was re-assigned. If he's ever interested in doing that, maybe he could interview your dh?
Buzz, my dad worked on missiles in the USAF. He worked on the now-retired BOMARC. He would have loved talking about this. From what you posted it sounds like this mission should be successful.
I was hoping smaller pieces would burn up easier in the atmosphere, but now I need to go back and read all this info again...
Truly, the public will hear very, very, little, if anything, about any black program super secret spy satellite except in a case such as this, and then we still won't hear about the technology, or the operation of the satellite.
Look at it this way. The people assigned to the shootdown, are already employed and being paid, the hardware already exists and has been expensed, and with the exception of some O/T and per diem, there aren't any additional costs.But buzz, the public has heard about it. Heck the public is blogging about it! It's the National Reconnaissance Office that is apparently unaware of a plutonium-powered outer space bus falling on North America in the next few days. www.nro.gov
BTW, the projected cost of shooting down the satellite rose from $60 million to $74 million overnight. Pretty expensive skeet shoot.![]()
Remember dingo, "whatever can go wrong, will go wrong."Australia prepares for falling satelite.
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=300249.
Police, the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) and Emergency Management Australia are all on standby as the United States prepares to shoot down a failed spy satellite.
The US military has said it hopes to smash the satellite as soon as next week - just before it enters Earth's atmosphere - with a single missile fired from a US Navy cruiser in the northern Pacific Ocean.
The US has told Australia and a handful of other nations to be on standby for falling debris from the highly classified satellite, because there is a minute possibility of the strike misfiring and debris falling on land rather than water.
"The Australian government has been advised formally by the US government that the president (George W Bush) has authorised the US Department of Defence to attempt to shoot down an inoperable satellite," a DFAT spokesman said.
A chance to showcase the U.S. missile defense system, on a "Sitting Duck."Just my opinion, but I think this eagerness to "shoot down" the satellite could be the U.S wanting to test out the missile defense system in case of "future threats".
Ive put the bike helmet back on Taximom![]()
Thanks Buzz..thats a comforting thoughtRemember dingo, "whatever can go wrong, will go wrong."
Youre a true matelol Dingo. :blowkiss: Forget the fee.